• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Listen to the scientists...

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Changing the name from global warming to climate change, to make sure all that all events can be used to justify the cause, was the equivalent of me making a prediction that the Quebec Nordiques will win the Grey cup in the 8th game in sudden death overtime by a score of 9 to 4, with the winning home run kicked in by player #24.

    Then when it becomes clear that my prediction was a little off, I change it to say that all sporting events will have either a winner and loser or a tie, therefore when my great aunt's lawn bowling team loses to the octegenarians team in the old folks home, I can say , see I told you so.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by caseih View Post
      the good thing, FJ , is that these ****heads can't catch a break . you would think the law of averages would say that they would get the odd prediction to come true ? but not one, NOT EVEN ONE!, has come true , whereas the people who predicted this extreme unseasonal cold because of sunspot activity nailed it ?
      maybe mother nature doesn't approve of the scam either
      It's because they believe the current trend will remain into eternity, so they flip their position from warming to cooling and vice versa, just as the trend tops or bottoms out. It's human nature. Similar to Dennis Gartmans kiss of death calls on markets. They ignore cyclical patterns

      Comment


        #13


        Dominic Barton should go back to Uganda or even China if he wants to live with 100,000,000 people.
        How about you let Canadians decide how many children they have to increase the population.
        He’s asking for pollution. Go back where you came from.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
          Changing the name from global warming to climate change, to make sure all that all events can be used to justify the cause, was the equivalent of me making a prediction that the Quebec Nordiques will win the Grey cup in the 8th game in sudden death overtime by a score of 9 to 4, with the winning home run kicked in by player #24.

          Then when it becomes clear that my prediction was a little off, I change it to say that all sporting events will have either a winner and loser or a tie, therefore when my great aunt's lawn bowling team loses to the octegenarians team in the old folks home, I can say , see I told you so.
          cluck cluck ,et al. , are spinning around, foaming at the mouth, looking for a reply to that one , lol

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by caseih View Post
            cluck cluck ,et al. , are spinning around, foaming at the mouth, looking for a reply to that one , lol
            Al they need to do is find one thing that hasn't yet been attributed to climate change to disprove my analogy, but fortunately, everything has been blamed on climate change already.

            Comment


              #16
              Here is how to tell bad science. Science never ever speculates. You will see lots of articles saying stuff like, although the temp blah blah is on a slower increase that predicted, current models show that it willl sharply increase in the future.....

              That is blatant guessing. Name another scientific field trying to model something out 100 yrs.

              Basically when NASA found out we cant send shuttles up every month to do nothing in low earth orbit and we cant get back to the moon cause somebody deleted the files from 1969, then they went all in on climate change to keep the lights on.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	EGIcPevXUAA5vNa.jpg
Views:	4
Size:	102.4 KB
ID:	769075

              Comment


                #17
                I like these scientists....

                Comment


                  #18
                  8 minute mark. Increase in CO2 always follows increase in temperature.

                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDOgWeTAas0&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDOgWeTAas0&feature=youtu.be

                  Comment


                    #19
                    That's not what the geologic record says. Sounds like scale bias. I see no correlation.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	EETqIAEUYAE7rmF.jpg
Views:	9
Size:	95.6 KB
ID:	769078
                    Last edited by jazz; Oct 29, 2019, 18:35.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by recapped View Post
                      8 minute mark. Increase in CO2 always follows increase in temperature.

                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDOgWeTAas0&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDOgWeTAas0&feature=youtu.be

                      Very well done, logical, clear, no scary doomsday.
                      Oh but what about all the carbonated pop on earth? That is C02 loaded adding to the infinitesimal 4 parts per 10,000 of deadly planet killing/ essential to all plants, part of our atmosphere! See how absurd the C02 logic is?

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...