• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Scott Moe says nothing about agriculture

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Will they rename it "Agrighostown"?

    Comment


      #17
      Scott Moe NEEDS the Liberals to be in power so he can always be “Standing Up for Saskatchewan “
      he needs an Enemy that he can blame it on to keep him popular

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by mustardman View Post
        Scott Moe NEEDS the Liberals to be in power so he can always be “Standing Up for Saskatchewan “
        he needs an Enemy that he can blame it on to keep him popular
        Moe is going after the URBAN vote now....the rural vote isn't to important to him now ...we are just a bunch of whiners he doesn't want to hear....he wants a board seat so he will listen to practical solutions to a better royalty holiday for potash producers .....that where his focus is...

        He has only been elected by 14 year old saskparty members.....

        Farmers know he's a dud....just like chemical in a drought....

        Comment


          #19
          Moe is playing more politics with his list of 3 conditions.

          The conventional oil industry in much of Saskatchewan has adequate pipeline access and pricing is better than western select. The price is mostly down because the world price is down. But the industry continues to grow.

          Alberta has a much bigger pipeline access issue to solve. The Keystone and Line 3 are mostly ready to go in Canada but are being held up in the US. Can't blame Trudeau for those holdups can we? Trudeau ran a campaign on getting the TMX twinned.

          But when Moe makes his demands there was nothing about improving safety nets for agriculture. Instead we get the angry Moe grandstanding.

          He had a chance, still has a chance to design a carbon tax that he can do what ever he wants with. But no he lets Ottawa impose theirs so he can fight it. Politics my friends.

          Equalization is in the constitution. Harper and Kenney tweaked it and had a chance to change it but didnt. Again its politics plain and simple.

          He wont do anything about safety nets for farmers in crisis because he knows he has your vote regardless of if he does anything or not. He doesn't want to spend any more money on safety nets. Plain and simple.

          That's why there was not a mention of the problems in agriculture in his list of demands.
          Last edited by chuckChuck; Oct 23, 2019, 07:52.

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
            Moe is playing more politics with his list of 3 conditions.

            The conventional oil industry in much of Saskatchewan has adequate pipeline access and pricing is better than western select. The price is mostly down because the world price is down. But the industry continues to grow.

            Alberta has a much bigger pipeline access issue to solve. The Keystone and Line 3 are mostly ready to go in Canada but are being held up in the US. Can't blame Trudeau for those holdups can we? Trudeau ran a campaign on getting the TMX twinned.

            But when Moe makes his demands there was nothing about improving safety nets for agriculture. Instead we get the angry Moe grandstanding.

            He had a chance, still has a chance to design a carbon tax that he can do what ever he wants with. But no he lets Ottawa impose theirs so he can fight it. Politics my friends.

            Equalization is in the constitution. Harper and Kenney tweaked it and had a chance to change it but didnt. Again its politics plain and simple.

            He wont do anything about safety nets for farmers in crisis because he knows he has your vote regardless of if he does anything or not. He doesn't want to spend any more money on safety nets. Plain and simple.

            That's why there was not a mention of the problems in agriculture in his list of demands.
            Really sad to say it but this is all true!!!!!!

            Comment

            • Reply to this Thread
            • Return to Topic List
            Working...