• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Why isn’t Churchill used for oil transportation?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Guest

    #11
    Originally posted by Radical View Post
    Someone correct me if I’m wrong but I think shipping season is app 3 months.
    12 months now
    Sea ice all gone lol

    Comment

    • 6V53
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2018
      • 526

      #12
      Years ago CN and the government loaded a train load of hopper cars for Churchill , they loaded the cars empty at one end and filled at the other end and connected the cars two empty ends together than two full ends together. It was done to prove you couldn't haul grain to Churchill in hopper cars.

      Comment

      • blackpowder
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 9231

        #13
        Well. I dunno what that means but Churchill always a *** joke.
        No Gulf current and no Soviet ice breakers.
        A warm and fuzzy left over from the early fifty's when we thought we still had weight.

        Comment

        • makar
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2007
          • 1679

          #14
          All I know in the 70s I hated loading those frigging cp boxcars for churchill, and I am in the peace country on a cn line, like or not it was cwb doing, you would think someone was closer but cost effective just applies on the producer level.

          Comment

          • seldomseen
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2010
            • 2015

            #15
            I think Churchill would work if there was some money put in it but that will never happen. Where the grain goes and where oil goes there is money and jobs and Churchill has no voters.

            Comment

            • bucket
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2008
              • 17016

              #16
              Originally posted by makar View Post
              All I know in the 70s I hated loading those frigging cp boxcars for churchill, and I am in the peace country on a cn line, like or not it was cwb doing, you would think someone was closer but cost effective just applies on the producer level.
              Don't forget when the CWB was short instead of paying producers a premium...they gave it to the railways and hauled the grain back from churchill to vancouver...

              Churchill was storage....

              Comment

              • Misterjade9
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2016
                • 440

                #17
                Churchill is a non issue as a place to export from because we really don't do enough business with that part of the world anymore. We don't sell wheat to Russia and not much goes into Europe. That being said I fully believe that Churchill could be a great place to receive imported goods such as Russian fert. It is really Canada's only deep water northern port. How the fat man bamboozled the feds into fixing a railroad that they already had given him money to buy it is beyond me.

                Comment

                • littledoggie
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 835

                  #18
                  Have you heard of the A2A railroad proposal? Alaska to Alberta. Can be seen here:

                  http://www.a2arail.com/index.html

                  Comment

                  • jazz
                    Senior Member
                    • Jul 2018
                    • 9308

                    #19
                    Originally posted by littledoggie View Post
                    Have you heard of the A2A railroad proposal? Alaska to Alberta. Can be seen here:

                    http://www.a2arail.com/index.html
                    If a railway can be built, so can a pipeline in the same corridor. It will happen after we cut off our eastern welfare anchors.

                    Comment

                    • Rareearth
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2012
                      • 1617

                      #20
                      Don’t forget the water diversion from the north through the prairies.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...