• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

We Could Be Heading For A Mini Ice Age In 2030

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • farming101
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 3953

    #21
    More weather is happening as we speak.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Snow Cover April 11 19.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	21.0 KB
ID:	767220

    Comment

    • Guest

      #22
      Same as my on my fenceline lol
      Last edited by Guest; Apr 12, 2019, 14:00.

      Comment

      • fjlip
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2002
        • 9789

        #23
        Originally posted by farming101 View Post
        More weather is happening as we speak.

        [ATTACH]4144[/ATTACH]
        Oh NO the climate is CHANGING! The sky is falling in 12 years or 20 or 50 or maybe a 100...adapt, adapt, adapt...is the only correct advice. All just guesses, NOTHING can be proven into the future, the past data is easy but all can be fudged for $$$$, fortune tellers?

        Comment

        • fjlip
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2002
          • 9789

          #24
          Originally posted by jazz View Post
          All within the margin of variability in a chaotic non-linear non-determinant system.
          Why is all the doomsday estimates/guesses not given with a + or - % chance? Yes variability 1C is SFA.
          Regina is 5C warmer than me, and they are not burned up to cinders!

          Comment

          • sumdumguy
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2007
            • 11965

            #25
            Originally posted by shtferbrains View Post
            I'm wonder if you read the "retraction"?

            The woman is an Astrophysics PhD doing ongoing research about the sun that many don't seem to want to hear about at this time.

            Unlike climate change the science is not all in.

            Can you imagine the "hate" she had to endure from social media crusaders when they saw that "click bait".

            All the "retraction" did was minimize the sensationalizing of the original headline.

            HER LIFE was proably on the line. The heat from ‘global warming’ has warped some brains.

            Comment

            • AlbertaFarmer5
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2010
              • 12480

              #26
              Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
              Really! One piece of evidence can completely change the thousands if not millions of other pieces of current evidence that human caused climate change is real? If you believe that, then your understanding of science is limited.

              But hey, go ahead show us the one piece of evidence from a climate scientists that disproves human caused climate change. We are still waiting!
              It is worse than I thought, you truly have no concept of how the scientific method actually works do you? If consensus was all that was required for a theory to be written in stone, the world would still believe ( note, this is the word believe used in the correct context) in creationism, an earth centric universe, animicules, alchemy, witches, bad blood, global cooling, human sacrifice to appease gods etc. etc. Do you want a lesson in the scientific method, it may be a good place to start, without that basic knowledge, the rest of the discussion is very much pointless?

              To quote Einstein, Why 100 authors? If I were wrong, then one would have been enough!

              Comment

              • jazz
                Senior Member
                • Jul 2018
                • 9308

                #27
                Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                But hey, go ahead show us the one piece of evidence from a climate scientists that disproves human caused climate change. We are still waiting!

                Climate skeptics aren't making nay claims therefore we have no burden of proof. We simple doubt the science and not enough definitive evidence has been put forth, nor has any of the past predictions born out, therefore the theory is suspect until a tangible prediction is made from it that is shown to be true. Statue of Liberty under water by now was one. Ice free arctic was another.

                Comment

                • fjlip
                  Senior Member
                  • Oct 2002
                  • 9789

                  #28
                  THEY think we NEED the 100 authors/97% of "climate" scientists to beat the LIE into us! All the doomsaying is really hard to "believe" without CONSTANT bombarding the public with another scary scenario. It is endless and so far NOTHING in 50 years Has come to pass! Hello little red hen...the sky NEVER fell!

                  Comment

                  • newguy
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 2145

                    #29
                    Extremes for sure.

                    Comment

                    • jazz
                      Senior Member
                      • Jul 2018
                      • 9308

                      #30
                      Originally posted by newguy View Post
                      Extremes for sure.
                      Those extremes are normal for the prairies. Those numbers were hit in the 30s and 60s too.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...