If Stanley was innocent then so is Treadou
They both have a smoking gun,in the stanley case there is a body,did he have the right to kill,no unless you go with justafiable homacide,(whitch they didnt,just a case of flat out descrimination)in whitch case trodeau had a case for justly saving jobs,neither side is right but thats what we have to deal with.
As for the argument of Harper beeing just as bad,does that make any difference,they both used the power that comes with the job.
They both have a smoking gun,in the stanley case there is a body,did he have the right to kill,no unless you go with justafiable homacide,(whitch they didnt,just a case of flat out descrimination)in whitch case trodeau had a case for justly saving jobs,neither side is right but thats what we have to deal with.
As for the argument of Harper beeing just as bad,does that make any difference,they both used the power that comes with the job.
Comment