I've always had a problem with the choice of measurement media uses when defining spills, as in the oil industry. Media tends to list them in terms of liters of product. It catches the imagination as most people only look at the large first number, not the measure.
Now, instead of spills, we get a media report on swills of 5 to 50 parts per billion. Damn. that has got to be a rounding error in a billion until you look, and it's recorded out in the decimal range. If media really wants to get the public hyper concerned over swills, I'm astounded that the measure wasn't in parts per trillion out to the at least the second decimal.
Now, instead of spills, we get a media report on swills of 5 to 50 parts per billion. Damn. that has got to be a rounding error in a billion until you look, and it's recorded out in the decimal range. If media really wants to get the public hyper concerned over swills, I'm astounded that the measure wasn't in parts per trillion out to the at least the second decimal.
Comment