• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Me.....being stupid....asking questions

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bucket
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2008
    • 17033

    Me.....being stupid....asking questions

    So the typical answer for this whole SNC affair is that the federal government is looking out for employees, stakeholders and third party contractors....

    The question I have is ...what about the employees and stakeholders and third party contractors in western Canada????????

    Trudeau wouldn't meet with the truckers from Alberta??????
  • Horse
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2003
    • 1930

    #2
    Simple you dance with the one who brought you to the dance.

    Comment

    • beaverdam
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2018
      • 1451

      #3
      The simple explanation to the SNC-Lav story is that, the Trudeau Liberal government, particularly PMGroper, G. Butts, and Clerk of the Privy Council, Michael Wernick(essentially the Deputy PM) lobbied and preasured the Justice Minister JWRaybould to NOT go ahead with criminal charges against SNC-Lav.

      They each met with JWRaybould(3 times total) after the Justice Dept and the Crown Prosecution had already decided to go head with the criminal charges.

      Trudeau, Butts and Wernick didn't want SNC-Lav criminally charged, even though, those in the government Justice Dept felt the illegal acts warranted charges.

      Comment

      • wd9
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2000
        • 3196

        #4
        She still can't speak the truth, she does not have the freedom to do so and is still bound by attorney client privilege.

        It will all remain speculation which is why Trudeau "agreed" to let her "speak".

        Comment

        • shtferbrains
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2017
          • 5265

          #5
          She was there for the Huawei/China fiasco.

          Might be part of the reason she lost that job.

          Comment

          • beaverdam
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2018
            • 1451

            #6
            Originally posted by wd9 View Post
            She still can't speak the truth, she does not have the freedom to do so and is still bound by attorney client privilege.

            It will all remain speculation which is why Trudeau "agreed" to let her "speak".
            Yes, you are right. Trudeau has not waved privilege for her to speak about anything after the Justice Dept had decided,,,hence she will not be able to speak regarding the 3 meetings I have mentioned in my post above,,,,,which are the most critical in determining how much she was pressured and what threats were made to her.

            Comment

            • WiltonRanch
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2012
              • 4517

              #7
              It’ll look like a farce if she gets on the stand today and refuses to answer questions. Further muddying the waters casting doubt and suspicion.

              Comment

              • Reply to this Thread
              • Return to Topic List
              Working...