a question potential brawl

[malleefarmer]

Wether these figures are correct or remotely correct who knows but why is france so low on the emmisions is it nuclear generated power or combination of green and nuclear, or just a lack of industry?

[grassfarmer]

It'll be the nuclear generation. I believe about 3/4 of their electricity is generated by nuclear.

[redleaf]

Wether these figures are correct or remotely correct who knows but why is france so low on the emmisions is it nuclear generated power or combination of green and nuclear, or just a lack of industry?

[ATTACH]3540[/ATTACH]

My question is how did France end up so high on the production end ? What do they do there ?
Didn’t think they did much of anything except some pretty good wine and formerly some pretty good gunsmithing.

[samhill]

Sooo, it begs for the answer to the question”what portion of CO2 sequestration is done by these countries “

[15444]

My question is how did France end up so high on the production end ? What do they do there ?
Didn’t think they did much of anything except some pretty good wine and formerly some pretty good gunsmithing.

Your thinking of the Netherlands, where all they do is milk cows, grow flowers and smoke weed.

[grassfarmer]

My question is how did France end up so high on the production end ? What do they do there ?
Didn’t think they did much of anything except some pretty good wine and formerly some pretty good gunsmithing.

Big country, big population large agricultural sector but their biggest thing that most people probably wouldn't suspect is chemical production.

[sumdumguy]

Saskatchewan and Texas are about the same size as France.

[grassfarmer]

Saskatchewan and Texas are about the same size as France.

Same size as SK with nearly 67 million population!

[bobofthenorth]

This perfectly illustrates the fact that if the whole glowbull warming nonsense was even remotely about reducing emissions we'd go nuclear tomorrow. Glowbull warming is just a proxy for world government and wealth transfer, it has absolutely nothing to do with protecting the environment.

[grassfarmer]

This perfectly illustrates the fact that if the whole glowbull warming nonsense was even remotely about reducing emissions we'd go nuclear tomorrow. Glowbull warming is just a proxy for world government and wealth transfer, it has absolutely nothing to do with protecting the environment.

Er, there is a slight palatability issue in consumer confidence with everyone going all nuclear. There is a lot to be said for using more nuclear but try selling that to a populace that doesn't like pipelines or chemicals in their food.