• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why Stephen Harper's former policy director is defending Trudeau's carbon tax

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    In the USA these credits are called RINS I believe, and There was a mechanism to buy and sell them, in the ethanol industry.
    Maybe a stretch, IDK.

    Comment


      #17
      Well I m sure apas and all our farm reps are working on that question of how to get this to work for us farmers.
      They talk about it every day on the news.

      Comment


        #18
        APAS

        I don’t believe APAS has defended farmers in quite these terms of credits.
        APAS asks Senate ag committee to reconsider carbon tax
        Recognize farmers’ ability to reduce green house gas emissions through carbon sequestration

        May 8, 2018 – For Immediate Release – The Agricultural Producers Association of Saskatchewan maintains its opposition to the imposition of carbon pricing policy on Saskatchewan agricultural producers, a message that APAS President Todd Lewis will bring to the Senate today.

        The Standing Committee on Agriculture and Forestry is meeting to continue its study of items related to farming in Bill C-74 and Lewis will be presenting.

        “We need to be very clear,” Lewis says. “The Carbon Backstop policy applies mainly to Saskatchewan, and to our members who make up a very large part of Canada’s agricultural industry.”

        Lewis will be reminding the Senate that agricultural producers are unable to pass along any increased costs resulting from a carbon tax to consumers, and that farmers are not being recognized for the work they are already doing to reduce carbon emissions through carbon sequestration.

        Lewis also notes the irony in Bill C-74’s definition of a farmer as “…a person that carries on a farming business with a reasonable expectation of profit.”

        “The provisions contained in this Bill work to make that definition less credible,” Lewis says.

        However, they are saying “ reduce carbon emissions through carbon sequestration. “

        Comment


          #19
          First link from left leaning media second from right leaning media presume canadian


          http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-17/davidson-goodbye-to-the-all-pain,-no-gain-carbon-tax/5597614 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-17/davidson-goodbye-to-the-all-pain,-no-gain-carbon-tax/5597614

          https://www.atlasnetwork.org/news/article/canada-should-learn-from-australias-failed-carbon-tax-experiment https://www.atlasnetwork.org/news/article/canada-should-learn-from-australias-failed-carbon-tax-experiment

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by Jay-mo View Post
            I can't believe anyone could support a new tax where the government says (with a straight face) first give us your money and then we will give you more back.....LOL
            Sounds more like something that should be handled by Gaming and Lotteries department.
            agreed. 100% , just blows my mind that there are still people that are that stupid .....
            even if the thieven pricks did give it all back ? what about the 40% admin cost ? to create Quebec or eastern Canada jobs ????
            wake to **** up western Canada ?

            Comment

            • Reply to this Thread
            • Return to Topic List
            Working...