Yep thats how they prove many things nowadays

[fjlip]

If the "cooling sun" kicks off the volcanos, earthquakes as happened 1793- 1830, we might find out soon...COLD and food shortages = real climate disasters, not nice warm, green lush crops...

[AlbertaFarmer5]

What I find interesting is the peaks in civilization coincide with peaks in warm cycles. So if we are warming it should be nothing but good times ahead. However if we are cooling there's an increase in crop failures, disease and political instability. Why attempt to stop the good times?

Also keep in mind how much easier it is to adapt to growing crops in a warming environment vs. cooling. A few days longer growing season with no adaptation just results in missing out on potential, a few days shorter results in complete failure.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Same logic is applied in some modern day arguments

[ATTACH]2276[/ATTACH]

Global warming scientists were provided with a conclusion that frogs sense of hearing comes from their legs. In order to prove that this is true, an experiment was designed which was guaranteed to result in the required conclusion, regardless of input. After having their work published and peer reviewed by other scientists who also had proven that cutting off frogs legs caused them to go deaf, they refused to provide the raw data used in their experiment to anyone who dared to question the methodologies. They were however richly rewarded by those who initially created the conclusion, and given further research dollars to prove that the same is true for rabbits, kangaroos and grasshoppers.

[sawfly1]

yet you use the products of science every day.

then you diss it when it does not match your predetermined belief .

that is the beauty of science, it tests it all out.

it has got you this far, and now it is NFG.

[sumdumguy]

yet you use the products of science every day.

then you diss it when it does not match your predetermined belief .

that is the beauty of science, it tests it all out.

it has got you this far, and now it is NFG.

If it was real science rather than goon science, I might listen. Today CBC roared out a fear story, saying hundreds of scientists from 180 countries signed it, but they wouldn't say who they were or what they signed. What Bull Shit!

[sawfly1]

I do not think they have an evil plot to save the planet.

as far as conspiracy's go , this is a great one , organizing 98 % of them to go against
their oath to science. and make this stuff up.

sure there is a small scientific possibility , they are all wrong ,
or the most organised group of liars ever .
Trump could get some tips.

I myself would like to believe it is a natural climate variability .
then we do not have to change.

but the odds are , their math is way better than my wishful thinking

[bucket]

Natural climate variability. ....I like that term .....offers credibility to seeing the record high and lows for the daily weather reports......

[burnt]

I do not think they have an evil plot to save the planet.

as far as conspiracy's go , this is a great one , organizing 98 % of them to go against
their oath to science. and make this stuff up.

sure there is a small scientific possibility , they are all wrong ,
or the most organised group of liars ever .
Trump could get some tips.

I myself would like to believe it is a natural climate variability .
then we do not have to change.

but the odds are , their math is way better than my wishful thinking

98% of whom?

You DO realize that it was Obama who fabricated that number, based on a survey of a SELECT group of scientists?

From that relatively small number of schemers along with a bunch of misguided politicians and globalists comes a concerted effort to do exactly that to which Dr. Curry testified.