• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Yep thats how they prove many things nowadays

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SASKFARMER3
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2006
    • 14485

    #11
    Because chuck is just like the left is push their bullshit agenda with cut and paste useless facts.

    Fact the Venetian boat ride was a waste of 60 dollars.

    Comment

    • MBgrower
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2012
      • 1565

      #12
      most scientists work for governments and universities. their scientific studies and conclusions are likely driven by their master's agenda.

      Comment

      • Oliver88
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2012
        • 4688

        #13
        Originally posted by MBgrower View Post
        most scientists work for governments and universities. their scientific studies and conclusions are likely driven by their master's agenda.
        Not too mention the grant $ to pay for their research time.

        Comment

        • chuckChuck
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2006
          • 12682

          #14
          As many observers have noted before, a lot of far right conservatives are anti-science and anti evidence based decision making when the results of the science don't fit their paranoid conspiracy theories or political views.

          On the subject of humor its sometimes difficult to tell if some of the posts are serious or meant to be funny. Sometimes the funniest ones are the ones that are meant to be serious.

          Comment

          • bucket
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2008
            • 17016

            #15
            I think it's funny and true....

            Comment

            • farmaholic
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2010
              • 17466

              #16
              Is it "cause and effect" or should it be "pause and reflect".....before we react. I might try practicing this more.

              Comment

              • checking
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2008
                • 2391

                #17
                It would take a pretty dedicated scientist not to be influenced by an extra dollar (or any group), but let's say there is one.

                Scientific study concludes that at 500 ppm of atmospheric CO2, glaciation does not occur. We are approaching this level. Except the study has evidence from time that at 5600 ppm CO2, glaciation was still occurring. This does not jive, so the dedicated scientist has to conclude that other factors are at play, and finds one that could explain the non explainable. You guessed it, it is the sun.

                So the next time some dedicated politically motivated individual, not in it for the money, tells you that human activity is the cause of an over heating planet, please call bullshit.

                Comment

                • macdon02
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 1858

                  #18


                  What I find interesting is the peaks in civilization coincide with peaks in warm cycles. So if we are warming it should be nothing but good times ahead. However if we are cooling there's an increase in crop failures, disease and political instability. Why attempt to stop the good times?

                  Comment

                  • farmaholic
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2010
                    • 17466

                    #19
                    There's a big difference between all those last peaks and their relation to warming and increase population.... this time we have evolved to adapt to the changes better than ever before. Don't get me wrong, something catastrophic could definitely upset the "balance".... want to see chaos? Just short change the world of food! Slow changes would be much easier to adapt to than abrupt ones.... what would happen if we had a meteor strike or a volcanic winter that lasted a decade? Now that would be a bit of a cure for the cancer of the earth---humans, lol.

                    Comment

                    • burnt
                      Banned
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 3918

                      #20
                      Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                      As many observers have noted before, a lot of far right conservatives are anti-science and anti evidence based decision making when the results of the science don't fit their paranoid conspiracy theories or political views.

                      On the subject of humor its sometimes difficult to tell if some of the posts are serious or meant to be funny. Sometimes the funniest ones are the ones that are meant to be serious.

                      That's a really humorous post there chucky boy! You fail to see how it fits you better than those whom you try to belittle! Typical liberal blindness and double standard.

                      What isn't funny is that there are so many far-left liberals like you who think it's okay to pay out terrorists like Omar Khadr, making them Islamic-extremist, or terrorist, sympathizers. Wear your label proudly there chucky, especially around Remembrance Day.

                      Were you over to the Cenotaph telling them where you sympathies lay?

                      Just thought I'd apply your own "logic" to you.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...