• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Producer Group Director Elections.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • farmaholic
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 17464

    Producer Group Director Elections.

    It's that time of year. Does everyone take the time to vote? Do people think we need consolidation across the three Western grain producing provinces?
  • checking
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 2391

    #2
    Directed an inquiry to the only one running for the pulse board that grows soybeans. Asked what that agency really does for soy growers for their non-refundable check off soybean dollars. My answer is they do nothing since its such a major world crop. Wanted to know his answer. The dick wouldn't even reply, so I won't be sending in a ballot.

    Comment

    • jamesb
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 769

      #3
      Originally posted by checking View Post
      Directed an inquiry to the only one running for the pulse board that grows soybeans. Asked what that agency really does for soy growers for their non-refundable check off soybean dollars. My answer is they do nothing since its such a major world crop. Wanted to know his answer. The dick wouldn't even reply, so I won't be sending in a ballot.
      you should run if soybeans are important to you and you feel that soybean growers are being underrepresented

      Comment

      • jamesb
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 769

        #4
        One thing that ticks me off about the elections this year. Regarding Sask Wheat elections, I see that there is sitting Sask wheat directors who are not up for re-election actively showing preference for fellow directors and one other candidate. This is BS in my opinion. Some guys did this on Sask pulse a few years ago and they had to resign. This is a bad practice and needs to stop. There are lots of good candidates and I am hoping for a change.

        Comment

        • checking
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 2391

          #5
          That's not my point, or my interest. He might just have well stated that he didn't grow soybeans in his bio.

          All I wanted was his view, and I would have balloted for him. Now, not a chance.

          Comment

          • jamesb
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 769

            #6
            ok sure. My point was that your right that there is not enough soybean growers on the sask pulse board. There is a lot of beans being grown now in Sask, over 800000 acres this year. As a soybean grower we need representation. I have too many irons in the fire myself to consider running but there is lots of growers out there that can step up.

            Comment

            • Quadtrack
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2026
              • 196

              #7
              Originally posted by checking View Post
              Directed an inquiry to the only one running for the pulse board that grows soybeans. Asked what that agency really does for soy growers for their non-refundable check off soybean dollars. My answer is they do nothing since its such a major world crop. Wanted to know his answer. The dick wouldn't even reply, so I won't be sending in a ballot.
              Submit your inquiry to all those running. You will get a reply from one, guaranteed.

              Comment

              • Klause
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2010
                • 3644

                #8
                Originally posted by jamesb View Post
                ok sure. My point was that your right that there is not enough soybean growers on the sask pulse board. There is a lot of beans being grown now in Sask, over 800000 acres this year. As a soybean grower we need representation. I have too many irons in the fire myself to consider running but there is lots of growers out there that can step up.


                Representation for what?


                How many producer groups are there? They all do absolutely nothing. SPGA stood by and watched while we gave away the goose that laid the golden eggs then decided maybe spend some money researching it after.


                A complete waste of money and time... Out money that is.


                They do nothing.


                Politics and lobbying. Old boys clubs. Vacations and parties and events all paid for with producer checkoff funds.

                Comment

                • bgmb
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 1645

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Klause View Post
                  Representation for what?


                  How many producer groups are there? They all do absolutely nothing. SPGA stood by and watched while we gave away the goose that laid the golden eggs then decided maybe spend some money researching it after.


                  A complete waste of money and time... Out money that is.


                  They do nothing.


                  Politics and lobbying. Old boys clubs. Vacations and parties and events all paid for with producer checkoff funds.
                  I agree for the most part. MB canola has to work to figure out how to spend all the checkoff dollars they collect. Mentality is similar to federal gov in some ways.... We need to spend this money we have because if we dont that means we dont need it. so we have to spend it to justify our existence. Not going to say they do nothing useful but lots of $$ pissed away for sure and yes definitely old boys clubs for sure.

                  Canola cant even put together unbiased variety trials anymore, total joke.

                  Pulse growers in mb does some really good research. Don't mind paying that one.

                  Some groups want to merge into one group but of course Canola growers won't. Self serving gov mentality coming through again?

                  Comment

                  • farmaholic
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2010
                    • 17464

                    #10
                    I think the SPGA has done amazing work. They even reduced levies because they were collecting a windfall...that may change again in the future.

                    Could we get by with one wheat commission or even combined wheat and barley can call it a cereals commission?

                    Then theres SMGA (MUSTARD growers) and Sask Flax.

                    Has there been amalgamations for office synergies/efficiencies in some of the smaller commissions.

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...