Finally....

[Hamloc]

Just need to point something out here ...
Say the farmer makes $200,000 as said , he most likely spent over $1,000,000 on total inputs into the local economy...
The wage earner spends zero to earn his $200,000 relative to the farmer .
Most people forget that little tid bit of info or completely ignore it .
Also that farmer can make zero the next year and still have to spend $1,000,000 on total inputs into the local economy supporting many many jobs while he is called a whiner if he says anything at all by the likes of grassfarmer , or the wage earner who still gets his $200,000 without having to spend a dime to earn that other than fuel to get to work and back .

Like and agree 100%. I am a relatively small operator but as an example I spend probably $40-50 thousand on machinery repairs per year. Every parts department I visit has as few as 3 parts people but some have 5. All these employees jobs depend on people like me wearing out and breaking farm equipment. There is no doubt the net a farmer casts covers a much larger area to end up with $200000 left at the end of the day.

[wmoebis]

Just need to point something out here ...
Say the farmer makes $200,000 as said , he most likely spent over $1,000,000 on total inputs into the local economy...
The wage earner spends zero to earn his $200,000 relative to the farmer .
Most people forget that little tid bit of info or completely ignore it .
Also that farmer can make zero the next year and still have to spend $1,000,000 on total inputs into the local economy supporting many many jobs while he is called a whiner if he says anything at all by the likes of grassfarmer , or the wage earner who still gets his $200,000 without having to spend a dime to earn that other than fuel to get to work and back .

If the farm is incorporated the farmer is the wage earner and exactly the same. The Co farm spent the money to pay the farmer not the wage earner. Wage earners don't own the co and get the rewards when it is sold or dividends paid out.

[farmaholic]

I've often thought the same thing furrow....


Never have so many relied on so few.... in many ways!

[vvalk]

Just need to point something out here ...
Say the farmer makes $200,000 as said , he most likely spent over $1,000,000 on total inputs into the local economy...
The wage earner spends zero to earn his $200,000 relative to the farmer .
Most people forget that little tid bit of info or completely ignore it .
Also that farmer can make zero the next year and still have to spend $1,000,000 on total inputs into the local economy supporting many many jobs while he is called a whiner if he says anything at all by the likes of grassfarmer , or the wage earner who still gets his $200,000 without having to spend a dime to earn that other than fuel to get to work and back .

Never forget farming is one of the few industries that creates wealth from nothing. Vast majority of jobs just distribute or rearrange wealth. Eg. Service industry, any professional service and obviously government

[Jagfarms]

Copy and paste below of some information regarding the proposed tax changes


"Someone has done some serious digging and has come up with the real reason for"tax reform". Props to John Gormley as I swiped this comment from his thread earlier today:

John Gormley are you aware of this?

It's becoming clear that some very wealthy Canadian shareholders tied to Finance Minister Bill Morneau are positioned to benefit handsomely from the proposed federal tax changes for incorporated small businesses and professionals. As Canadians, we should be paying very close attention.

Just yesterday my husband and I learned about pension-type savings options for small business owners called Retirement Compensation Arrangements (RCAs) and Individual Pension Plans (IPPs, geared more towards business owners in their 50s).

These retirement savings plans/products were suggested to us as potential next steps if the proposed federal tax legislation affecting small business goes through. (For context, given our incorporated structure, if the legislation is passed, any income we draw when we retire will have been taxed at a rate of 73%. Clearly, this doesn't seem like a fair deal for a lifetime's worth of work, so we—like every other incorporated small business owner out there—are working hard to understand what our options are.)

Today, from an All Nova Scotia article (Sept 19), we learned that the largest provider of these pension plans in Canada is none other than Morneau Shepell.

That's right, Morneau Shepell—the multinational benefits/pensions consulting firm founded by Federal Finance Minister Bill Morneau's dad, William Frank Morneau, Sr. in 1966, with annual revenue in 2016 totalling $592 million Cdn. It's the largest benefits and pension firm in Canada.

Today, William Frank Morneau is listed as honourary chair and founder of Morneau Shepell on the company's website. And Bill Morneau, according to the All Nova Scotia article, "...controls over 2.2 million Morneau Shepell shares worth over $47 million based on the closing stock price on Monday."

If the federal government brings in their proposed tax changes, led by Justin Trudeau and Finance Minister Bill Morneau, incorporated small businesses across Canada will be forced to close their holdings companies and opt instead for other retirement savings strategies... like the private pension plans offered by Morneau Shepell.

So who really stands to benefit from the legislation that's being positioned as changes to make the tax system fairer?

That's right: Bill Morneau, major shareholder in Canada's largest pension corporation. Bill Morneau, Canada's Federal Finance Minister. Bill Morneau, the guy who keeps saying he's closing "loopholes" and "fancy accounting schemes" that give wealthy Canadians unfair advantages over the middle class (...you know, those greedy farmers and doctors and local business owners and such).

While doctors are making calls to healthcare organizations offering jobs south of the border, and small business owners nearing retirement are looking at having to work for several more years, and family farms and businesses passed on through generations face being penalized for passing them down to their kids (and rewarded for selling them to anyone other than their kids), and young couples who've put everything on the line to start their dream business come to terms with the fact that the rug has been pulled out from under them, Morneau Shepell directors and shareholders must be rubbing their hands together in eager anticipation of the windfall to come their way.

If there's a "fancy accounting scheme" that deserves the government's full attention right now, including a thorough Conflict of Interest investigation, I think it's staring them right in the face.

[tweety]

Ask your accountant. That is exactly what mine told me as well. And this was confirmed by another accountant with whom I asked the same question.

Well that's not a very good answer!

The question was how. Since you were obviously told, how about sharing it. We need some facts in this discussion.

Certainly the passive investing and laundering income thru all the families kids days are over.

[Jagfarms]

http://www.morneaushepell.com/ca-en/about-us



QUOTE=Jagfarms;356517]Copy and paste below of some information regarding the proposed tax changes


"Someone has done some serious digging and has come up with the real reason for"tax reform". Props to John Gormley as I swiped this comment from his thread earlier today:

John Gormley are you aware of this?

It's becoming clear that some very wealthy Canadian shareholders tied to Finance Minister Bill Morneau are positioned to benefit handsomely from the proposed federal tax changes for incorporated small businesses and professionals. As Canadians, we should be paying very close attention.

Just yesterday my husband and I learned about pension-type savings options for small business owners called Retirement Compensation Arrangements (RCAs) and Individual Pension Plans (IPPs, geared more towards business owners in their 50s).

These retirement savings plans/products were suggested to us as potential next steps if the proposed federal tax legislation affecting small business goes through. (For context, given our incorporated structure, if the legislation is passed, any income we draw when we retire will have been taxed at a rate of 73%. Clearly, this doesn't seem like a fair deal for a lifetime's worth of work, so we—like every other incorporated small business owner out there—are working hard to understand what our options are.)

Today, from an All Nova Scotia article (Sept 19), we learned that the largest provider of these pension plans in Canada is none other than Morneau Shepell.

That's right, Morneau Shepell—the multinational benefits/pensions consulting firm founded by Federal Finance Minister Bill Morneau's dad, William Frank Morneau, Sr. in 1966, with annual revenue in 2016 totalling $592 million Cdn. It's the largest benefits and pension firm in Canada.

Today, William Frank Morneau is listed as honourary chair and founder of Morneau Shepell on the company's website. And Bill Morneau, according to the All Nova Scotia article, "...controls over 2.2 million Morneau Shepell shares worth over $47 million based on the closing stock price on Monday."

If the federal government brings in their proposed tax changes, led by Justin Trudeau and Finance Minister Bill Morneau, incorporated small businesses across Canada will be forced to close their holdings companies and opt instead for other retirement savings strategies... like the private pension plans offered by Morneau Shepell.

So who really stands to benefit from the legislation that's being positioned as changes to make the tax system fairer?

That's right: Bill Morneau, major shareholder in Canada's largest pension corporation. Bill Morneau, Canada's Federal Finance Minister. Bill Morneau, the guy who keeps saying he's closing "loopholes" and "fancy accounting schemes" that give wealthy Canadians unfair advantages over the middle class (...you know, those greedy farmers and doctors and local business owners and such).

While doctors are making calls to healthcare organizations offering jobs south of the border, and small business owners nearing retirement are looking at having to work for several more years, and family farms and businesses passed on through generations face being penalized for passing them down to their kids (and rewarded for selling them to anyone other than their kids), and young couples who've put everything on the line to start their dream business come to terms with the fact that the rug has been pulled out from under them, Morneau Shepell directors and shareholders must be rubbing their hands together in eager anticipation of the windfall to come their way.

If there's a "fancy accounting scheme" that deserves the government's full attention right now, including a thorough Conflict of Interest investigation, I think it's staring them right in the face.[/QUOTE]

[Sodbuster]

When people talk about the low tax rates corporations pay they fail to include the fact that the money is taxed again when the shareholders take it out personally. You are just delaying or postponing the tax in a corp. When you retire whether you take it out as salary or dividends you may pay another 54% on top of the 18% that the corp paid in the past. Dividends are grossed up so that there is no real tax advantage.

This sums up our current system quite well. In the end because we are double taxed as we pull money out of the corp we will pay more taxes than the average wage earner making the amount of income. The current system works well, proposed changes are disturbing. For instance how do you determine passive income? Example, my farm has $1,000,000 in a short term saving account by the end of the year it may be at $0, this is money that I will use for fertilizer, seed, chemical and future capital expenditures. Even though this is my working capital will the new proposals view this as passive income?

[vvalk]

Well that's not a very good answer!

The question was how. Since you were obviously told, how about sharing it. We need some facts in this discussion.

Certainly the passive investing and laundering income thru all the families kids days are over.

What's wrong with passive iincome? You don't want any business owner thinking outside then box to create more wealth and therefore more taxes and what's really important more jobs? Just because that income is outside the primary reason for the business, who cares? Tweety you think farmers should only farm and not look to try new ideas or ventures?

[wmoebis]

This sums up our current system quite well. In the end because we are double taxed as we pull money out of the corp we will pay more taxes than the average wage earner making the amount of income. The current system works well, proposed changes are disturbing. For instance how do you determine passive income? Example, my farm has $1,000,000 in a short term saving account by the end of the year it may be at $0, this is money that I will use for fertilizer, seed, chemical and future capital expenditures. Even though this is my working capital will the new proposals view this as passive income?

Won't you still be taxed after costs of prodution and only on profits from sales?