• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Canola Fertility

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • farmaholic
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 17482

    #21
    Thanks

    Comment

    • bgmb
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2007
      • 1645

      #22
      Klause, I would post pics of 60 + last 2 years on 120-45-10-15 but **** it everyone knows big N rates don't help canola yields. NH3 too for decades.

      Comment

      • Klause
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2010
        • 3644

        #23
        And how much of that N is being lost? U of S did research and found the N efficiency rate for high N protocols is about 55%.



        Also... Manitoba soils generally need higher rates of fertilizer... Rec's for oats are generally 100lbs/ac in Mb and 55-65 in SK/AB.

        Comment

        • bgmb
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2007
          • 1645

          #24
          Next to none would be lost all spring applied at seeding 2-2.5 inches deep sideband with shank not mrb disc. Yeah I agree all soild are different. And I would not expect all areas will be able to grow 60 canola. I will say we hit 50 in the early 2000s with canolas that by the numbers had 30% lower yield potential than current varieties and we were using roughly 2/3 the fert we are now.

          Comment

          • Klause
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2010
            • 3644

            #25
            Originally posted by bgmb View Post
            Next to none would be lost all spring applied at seeding 2-2.5 inches deep sideband with shank not mrb disc. Yeah I agree all soild are different. And I would not expect all areas will be able to grow 60 canola. I will say we hit 50 in the early 2000s with canolas that by the numbers had 30% lower yield potential than current varieties and we were using roughly 2/3 the fert we are now.

            I'll only say on the first part of your post... You need to understand the N cycle a lot more.

            Have a read.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20170919_140345.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	85.8 KB
ID:	766010Click image for larger version

Name:	1505852181554-523499556.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	94.4 KB
ID:	766011

            Comment

            • bgmb
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2007
              • 1645

              #26
              Klause I understand the nitrogen cycle. I dont consider applied nitrogen fertilizer that enters the nitrogen cycle "lost"

              Comment

              • bgmb
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2007
                • 1645

                #27
                Fyi Klause we have gone from 5 ish organic matter to 7% ish organic matter over the last 20 years. Min/zero till, lots of nitrogen fert, a good rotation contributed to that increase.

                Comment

                • Klause
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 3644

                  #28
                  Originally posted by bgmb View Post
                  Klause I understand the nitrogen cycle. I dont consider applied nitrogen fertilizer that enters the nitrogen cycle "lost"


                  No one said it's a waste. I'm also not advocating the end of using nitrogen. I'm saying become more efficient with it. You're putting on about 140 lbs the plant will use about 48% of that. The rest is lost to denitrification, volatization, chealation, etc.

                  Comment

                  • bgmb
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 1645

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Klause View Post
                    No one said it's a waste. I'm also not advocating the end of using nitrogen. I'm saying become more efficient with it. You're putting on about 140 lbs the plant will use about 48% of that. The rest is lost to denitrification, volatization, chealation, etc.
                    We will have to agree to disagree on this one Klause. 60bu *2lb/bu =120 lb maybe I am a little light on the p and k overall goal on our farm is to fertilize for a 50 bu crop removal. Maybe will up them on some fields next year and see if that works along with normal n rates.

                    Comment

                    • seabass
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2005
                      • 825

                      #30
                      Depends on mother nature. Best laid out plans can be blown to hell when she shows up.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...