• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Market is yelling at you, DON'T PLANT WHEAT !

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ColevilleH2S
    Senior Member
    • May 2007
    • 1643

    #11
    Originally posted by Kinger View Post
    ...$7 50bu red spring looks great till you realize you only need to grow 58.3bu feed at $6 to get the same revenue.
    Where the heck does a guy find a $7.50 bid?
    A number 1, 13.5px CWRS tops out at $6.58 around here.

    Comment

    • Braveheart
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2001
      • 3257

      #12
      I was wondering that too Kinger. I'm thinking maybe Cargill?

      Comment

      • westernvicki
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2014
        • 867

        #13
        Welcome to the new reality: increased production and competition.

        A few years back I encouraged the value round tables via Pulse Industry Round Table to invest in a comprehensive study the bench mark the competitiveness of Canadian production and logistics chain versus those of emerging producers in the Baltic, sadly to say the timing was not right. The timing of the idea was not right, obviously, but pertinent it is. However understanding our competitors is an important tool in agricultural policy.

        The carbon tax is dangerous, unless farmers are rewarded for carbon sequestration and historic cumulations are valued.

        The Russians are coming, and not just the Russians unfortunately. As for Russia, well
        Putin is a leader who personally has witnessed hunger in his country, as a driver of innovation I doubt much else compares.

        Comment

        • walterm
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2003
          • 333

          #14
          Originally posted by westernvicki View Post
          Welcome to the new reality: increased production and competition.

          A few years back I encouraged the value round tables via Pulse Industry Round Table to invest in a comprehensive study the bench mark the competitiveness of Canadian production and logistics chain versus those of emerging producers in the Baltic, sadly to say the timing was not right. The timing of the idea was not right, obviously, but pertinent it is. However understanding our competitors is an important tool in agricultural policy.

          The carbon tax is dangerous, unless farmers are rewarded for carbon sequestration and historic cumulations are valued.

          The Russians are coming, and not just the Russians unfortunately. As for Russia, well
          Putin is a leader who personally has witnessed hunger in his country, as a driver of innovation I doubt much else compares.
          Wonder where CPC is? They could be screamiing for sequestration payments for farmers. But we now see that like the Modernization of Grain Act was all about making CGC money at farmers expence so any help may not be in our favor.

          Comment

          • Hamloc
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2014
            • 3922

            #15
            Simple question, yes getting payed for carbon sequestration sounds great but what happens in the wet years like now when some tillage is required, do you have to pay it back? My experience is when you hop into bed with the government you will eventually get screwed!

            Comment

            • SASKFARMER3
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2006
              • 14485

              #16
              Wall to wall wheat.

              Comment

              • Kinger
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2016
                • 161

                #17
                Originally posted by Braveheart View Post
                I was wondering that too Kinger. I'm thinking maybe Cargill?
                Sorry meant to put $7/bu on 50bu crop.

                Everyone knows Pioneer isn't hitting close to that anytime soon.

                Comment

                • SASKFARMER3
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2006
                  • 14485

                  #18
                  7 x 60 = 420 for wheat yes inputs are up their. 6 x 50 = 300 now not so good.
                  3 x 120 oats = 360 its good if you need a filler but at 2.75 its 330.
                  Barley malt at 80 x 5 = 400 feed 80 x 2.75 = 220 not so good.
                  Funny always need the yield to make it work. or get paid malt.


                  You need a filler last year for us the wheat was a money maker. Barley a dud and oats we didn't grow any.

                  Comment

                  • farmaholic
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2010
                    • 17479

                    #19
                    Sixty bu/ac wht year in year out is a ****ing dream....and by now you all know where I farm.

                    Comment

                    • SASKFARMER3
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2006
                      • 14485

                      #20
                      What I'm saying is yes it is achievable to get those yields but consistently without issues is tough.
                      'Hail flood etc take away yield real fast.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...