Originally posted by grassfarmer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Our Pm has a plan and its a Bad Bad Plan!
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Be careful what you wish for grassfarmer, returning CO2 to pre-industrial age levels will have significant negative effect on crop/grass yields and drought tolerance. While the debate rages on regarding the possible greenhouse effect and what the net effect might be, whether positive or negative, the fact that plants perform better with elevated CO2 levels is provable and well documented.
-
I would prefer incentives for carbon sequestration vs tax/penalization approach. There is a lot of marginal or wasteland that could have trees planted. Perennial forage is another carbon sink. Rebates for geothermal, solar panels, etc. It seems that Chuckles and Mustard would prefer the heavy hand of government penalties like the Trudeau Libs. Next step will likely be a Gulag to exile SF3 and any other climate change deniers to.
Comment
-
Ah, so that's why god told Joseph to built the pyramids to store grain in, lol!Originally posted by checking View PostNo,no, no.
The world needs less animal based protein because it is a hog (pun intended) on its greenhouse gas emissions to produce that kg of meat compared to the O2 positives of plant based protein.
Not according to the New Scientist.Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View PostBe careful what you wish for grassfarmer, returning CO2 to pre-industrial age levels will have significant negative effect on crop/grass yields and drought tolerance. While the debate rages on regarding the possible greenhouse effect and what the net effect might be, whether positive or negative, the fact that plants perform better with elevated CO2 levels is provable and well documented.
[URL="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11655-climate-myths-higher-co2-levels-will-boost-plant-growth-and-food-production/"]http://https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11655-climate-myths-higher-co2-levels-will-boost-plant-growth-and-food-production/[/URL]
For sure incentives are worth a look - but we've got to stop the people burning fossil fuel to turn marginal land and trees into more grain land in this day and age that just makes no sense.Originally posted by Braveheart View PostI would prefer incentives for carbon sequestration vs tax/penalization approach. There is a lot of marginal or wasteland that could have trees planted.
Comment
-
These are the places that need the carbon tax.
Take a close look at the left coast.
Compare it to light emitted in your local.
https://www.google.ca/search?q=world night map&tbm=isch&imgil=o6sBlhky9YpPhM%253A%253BrZaFv5z NMsKH
I hope we get great satisfaction pumping that DEF into that equipment when not another person is in sight.
Liberal logic.
Alta-boy Justin.
Line up for your boy scout badge!
.
Comment
-
-
The article definitely does acknowledge the yeild and drought tolerance benefits to plants with increased CO2. Not sure how this refutes my statement?Originally posted by
Not according to the New Scientist.
[URL="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11655-climate-myths-higher-co2-levels-will-boost-plant-growth-and-food-production/"http://https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11655-climate-myths-higher-co2-levels-will-boost-plant-growth-and-food-production/[/URL]
Comment
-
Funny thing about marginal land, all of the best land was the first broke, by my time all that was left unbroke was what had been considered the poorest ground. But because previous generations had ****d and pillaged the good ground so long, while the cattle fertilized the marginal ground and nature looked after it, the opposite is now true. Now, I break the marginal ground and it is by far the best. And I intend look after it to keep it that way too. Some just takes a little more work due to other limitations.Originally posted by grassfarmer View PostWhen it's an H on the A-J scale I think that would be considered by most to be marginal.
Comment
-
Was someone told that Ag would be exempt from the carbon tax? Because the Ontario Liberals are fighting hard to have any exemptions at all stripped from Ag in this province - starting with off road fuel. And you know how cozy Drama Boy and the Dyke are with each other. If he is like his prick of an old man, he'll make Ag pay big-time.
Comment
-
If the purpose is to transfer wealth from west to east, then it is safe to say Ag would not be exempt.Originally posted by 15444 View PostWas someone told that Ag would be exempt from the carbon tax? Because the Ontario Liberals are fighting hard to have any exemptions at all stripped from Ag in this province - starting with off road fuel. And you know how cozy Drama Boy and the Dyke are with each other. If he is like his prick of an old man, he'll make Ag pay big-time.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment