114 years of Scientists Warnings about climate

[seabass]

Damn right Tweet

[ajl]

The science industry has pandered to getting tax funded research grant for so long it has very little credibility left. For instance if so called scientists had been honest in the BSE crisis and said that the don't know much about it the outcome may have been very different for many cattle producers. True discoveries do stand the test of time though but have to sort out a lot of junk before we can say something is true.

[dmlfarmer]

The climate scientists need to constantly provide evidence for warming and impending doom. That is called "job security". Drum up some bias study on man made climate change and get it published in some obscure environmentalist journal. The more they make the case for climate change the more funding they get, the more posh conferences in France, Belguim and Iceland they get to attend.

And how does that make them any less credible than the "scientist" who is receiving funding from the oil industry to refute climate change, or by the environmental lobby to protest against GMOs or glyphosate, or use of pesticides? Or even the "scientist" or "consumer" climate change denier or Monsanto or GMO or conventional farming techniques in order to flog their book or to be paid to travel around the world giving speeches about their causes?