Buffet's got some explaining to do.

**HappyFarmer** · Dec 30, 2013, 17:53

So what's your point?

**bucket** · Dec 30, 2013, 18:18

Well, lets keep railroading oil around and blowing the tankers up for fun, instead of using a ****ing pipeline.

How does it that noboby gets that the keystone pipeline isn't being built until Buffet recoups his money in the railways he and bill gates have bought.

**HappyFarmer** · Dec 30, 2013, 18:58

So buffet has explaining to do because there is no
pipeline so he is forcing oil companies to use his
railway?

Really?

That your theory?

You want $150 barrel oil?

This comming for a guy who says the u.s.
government should tax him more because he
makes so much?

The politics surrounding keystone go way behold
Bershire staying rich.

**bucket** · Dec 30, 2013, 19:55

Just saying BNSF railroad and others are shipping alot of oil by rail and it makes no sense.

He owns it - who do you think should be responsible?

**bucket** · Dec 31, 2013, 08:33

I was wrong , he just bought a pipeline business.

Problem solved.

**fjlip** · Dec 31, 2013, 10:40

Is Buffet one of the problems in our grain movement? What does he own up here?

**bucket** · Dec 31, 2013, 11:15

I don't think its buffet up here, I think Gates owns the canadian railways.

**cottonpicken** · Dec 31, 2013, 12:19

The pipeline companies put out bids for moving
oil,i heard it was 45 dollars a barrel this
year,shipping by railroad is much cheaper plus the
high quality oil out of the bakken capture its
premium,so gluts are not good at all even when
internatioal prices are good,frickin sucks

**Oliver88** · Dec 31, 2013, 20:46

This one is on Obama for not approving the Keystone XL.
Also Buffet is his buddy who is benefitting with more oil being shipped on BNSF as well.

The less pipelines for oil, the worse grain movement will be and higher the basis/deductions will be. The Northern Gateway and other pipelines will be huge benefits for grain movement as well.

Buffet's got some explaining to do.