What's Harper and co. afraid of?

[silverback]

How about this for a thoughtful comment.

I don't believe I have the right to even one cents worth of your property, so why would you think you have a right to mine?

Answer that truthfully, thoughtfully and honestly for all of us. Any of you other pro board people feel free also. Keep it short and just answer the question.

[TOM4CWB]

Prairiefire,

Thoughtful and respectful farmers would NOT confiscate their neighbours (produce) private property.

Honest hard working farmers are not THEIVES. They are not sucked in by a highly motivated bunch of 'superstar' sales force that couldn't sell there way out of a wet paper bag... without a 'single buying desk' that expropriates what they sell.

Nice try Prairiefire... socialism turns into fascism... when folks wake up to the reality... redisribution of unearned confiscated wealth... never made anyone prosperous. It just turned them into theives with shiny trinkets and full bellies for a few days... till they ran through their neighbours savings.

[Prairiefire]

So....the debate on Bruce's issues ???

[silverback]

Answer my question and then we can have a thoughtful and respectful discussion of issues.

Have you not been paying attention? Or are you just a crap disturber? Producer cars won't change. Branch lines will still be there. Rural communities will thrive with more kids staying on the farm. Cats and dogs will be in harmony. How many more benefits do you want?

[Prairiefire]

Bruce`s questions on producer cars,sidings and shortline railroads are an important part of the CWB discussion . And as he questions ,would they survive? Hardly, why ? Because they are in the way of the grain indusry's grand plan of not having any farmer load producer cars.Why is it that just a few short years ago that trucking incentives apeared on our grain cheques ? Ever heard of the railway freight revenue cap? Where do go the extra $ collected. Remember the railways once they reach a certain $ limit must pay up to somebody for overcharging. So all they have to do is pay$ to the grain co's to load 50 and more cars at a time , the cap is liberated and the grain co's have $ to entice more grain deliveries . How is that the freight cap gets up to that $ limit ? Is it possible that we are paying too much for freight ? Ah who cares... Aug 1,2012 will be liberating for all the cats and mice. Oh the rural communities , well as you know we have an aging population who practiced birth control and even lord forbid abortions . Quess what , less kids , smaller school enrollments, school closures ,less population in rural communities . Hmm .

[TOM4CWB]

You are strange.

Cheers!

[jdepape]

Prairie fire:
Some things to think about.

The average trucking premium on wheat is over
$6.00/tone.
The average net rate that grain companies pay
(with incentives) is just north of $ 6.00/tonne.

In other words, farmers pay on average about
the same as what grain companies are paying,
regardless of the single car rate being deducted
on your cash ticket. And being a supporter of the
CWB and pooling, I suspect you would be quite
satisfied with averaging things out like this.

As for producer cars and short lines....when
anyone talks about losing these, it is always on
the basis of "losing" the CWB and not just the
single desk. It seems to me that the CWB could
play an important role here by partnering up with
Mission Terminal and Churchill and whoever else
they want, and the CWB could continue to
support producer car loaders and branch lines.

If it's true - as some say - that producer cars are
dead without the CWB because the grain
companies don't want to deal in them, then it
would be an ideal place for the CWB.

It's up to Oberg and Co now. If I were A
producer car loader, I'd be calling Oberg or my
director and pressing them on this one.

[jdepape]

Correction...
The average net rate the grain companies pay is
just north of $6.00/tonne below the single car
rate.

Point is farmers are getting the majority of the
incentives for loading 50 and 100 car blocks.

[Braveheart]

It's obvious to me that Bruce Johnstone is little more than a political pawn.

Johnstone lists as his title,financial editor, yet fails to recognize the CWB issue is a business issue. He has fallen hook, line and sinker for the lefts' fear mongering tactics re producer cars.

This has tarnished his reputation as a journalist, if indeed Johnstone ever qualified. A journalist would have checked the Canada Grain Act to see what rules, since the Sintaluta case, apply to producer cars.

A serious journalist would have asked producer car loading site partners if it was a wise investment to sink thousands of dollars into an investment where your terminal, a terminal like Mission Terminals, can only operate with the CWB entrenched.

A serious journalist would have asked other terminal operators if they would accept producer cars from farmers.

It takes alot more than a measly producer car loading site to sustain a community. The curtain was going to come down on hundreds of communities when the rail system started rationalizing back in the 1960's. Most of them today are thriving today and some are in fact growing. Johnstone could have researched that instead of taking the word of some doom and gloom leftists.

Chuckchuck and Prairiefire seem to think that the words of Bruce Johnstone are somehow tablets of truth delivered from the mount. They are, however, little more than unresearched dribble from a lazy writer. Not a journalist.

[bucket]

Why do pro board people never answer questions?

Why do farmers that load producer cars not share or pool their savings with the rest of us?

ANYONE care to answer that?

Is it because they want the fruits of their labour for themselves?MMMMMMMMMM.

Interesting concept.