• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

McDonald's sued over Happy Meals

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    McDonald's sued over Happy Meals

    Charlie,

    There MUSt be some 'pool' application of this... <(>:{)

    McDonald's sued over Happy Meals

    15/12/2010 2:33:29 PM

    CBC News
    A consumer protection group filed a class-action suit against McDonald's Wednesday morning, claiming the toys included in Happy Meals bait and induce children to develop a preference for nutritionally poor foods.


    The suit was filed by the Center for Science in the Public Interest on behalf of Monet Parham of Sacramento, Calif., and her six-year-old daughter Maya.

    "McDonald's exploits very young California children and harms their health by advertising unhealthy Happy Meals with toys directly to them," the suit states.

    "Children eight-years-old and younger do not have the cognitive skills and the developmental maturity to understand the persuasive intent of marketing and advertising," the suit continues. "Thus, McDonald's advertising featuring toys to bait children violates California law because it is inherently deceptive and unfair."

    The lawsuit contains allegations not proven in court.

    In a written statement to CBC News, McDonald's spokeswoman Bridget Coffing stated: "We are proud of our Happy Meals and intend to vigorously defend our brand, our reputation and our food."

    "We stand by our 30-year track record of providing a fun experience for kids and families at McDonald's."

    The case will be heard in San Francisco, which recently passed a local ordinance setting nutritional standards for children's meals sold with toys.

    "I am very concerned about the health of my children and feel that McDonald's should be a very limited part of their diet and their childhood experience," explained Parham.

    She said she's bringing the suit because her daughter insists on going to McDonald's to get toys based on Barbie, I-Carly, Shrek or Strawberry Shortcake.

    "As other busy, working moms and dads know, we have to say 'no' to our young children so many times, and McDonald's makes it so much harder to do."

    McDonald's intent is to 'subvert parental authority'

    The suit states that: "Internal McDonald's documents prove its intent to subvert parental authority."

    One such document quotes Martin Lindstrom - who advises McDonald's on branding and marketing - stating in a presentation that McDonald's "gets into the parents' wallets via the kids' minds."

    According to another document, former McDonald's CEO Roy Bergold described the restaurant's strategy in a magazine article as "go after the kids."

    "Ray Kroc [McDonald's founder] said that if you had $1 to spend on marketing, spend it on kids. Why? Because they can't get to the restaurant by themselves and they eat a lot."

    Bergold also told the magazine that children are tempted more by the toys than the food.

    "What kids see as a fun toy, I now realize is a sophisticated, high-tech marketing scheme that's designed to put McDonald's between me and my daughters," Parham said. "I want McDonald's to stop interfering with my family."

    The Center for Science in the Public Interest says most McDonald's Happy Meals contain more calories and sodium than is healthy for a child.

    "McDonald's offerings consist mostly of fatty meat, fatty cheese, french fries, white flour and sugar - a narrow combination of foods that promotes weight gain, obesity, diabetes and heart disease - and may lead to a lifetime of poor diets."

    #2
    WD9,

    Could we say... claim we were deceived by CWB enticements and propaganda that were false about the 'single desk' pooled monopoly?!!!

    Then,

    Tie this into unfair election interference for taking the side of 'single desk' monopoly Director Candidates???

    Tony Merchant... What do you think?

    Good enough topic for an animated Video... don't you think SF3?

    Comment


      #3
      That would require admitting that you "do not have the cognitive skills and the developmental maturity to understand" wouldn't it?

      Comment


        #4
        Grassfarmer,

        Is there any question after the way the majority of 'designated area' grain growers... voted... in recent CWB elections?

        The CWB pools are simply false promises that force well meaning grain growing folks into losses in the billions... because of deceptive and fraudulent marketing tactics!

        The CWB refuses to follow its own Code of COnduct and respect grain growers... The CWB spend our grain growers money to deceive us and promote/promise a scheme that fails year after year. THe CWB scheme cannot work because its design is to do the opposite of its stated purpose.

        So Grassy... what would you admit to... being part of the cover up... so we can sue you too... because you want cheap livestock feed???

        Comment


          #5
          Not admitting to anything Tom, cos i'm not really involved. I'm happy to see the cwb continue as I think it's the best chance you grain folks have of getting better prices - I'm not a grain feeder anyway I prefer grass and forage.

          Instead of pointing fingers at people that are not involved maybe you anti-board types should get your heads together before the next election and decide whether you are going to support your candidates, vote for change, or boycott the vote. Splitting your potential anti cwb vote because you couldn't decide which policy to follow probably cost you the election if anti-cwb sentiment is as strong as you claim it is.

          Comment


            #6
            Grassy,

            Clever as a fox...

            "Not admitting to anything Tom, cos i'm not really involved"

            That was a foxy bluff... Grassy!

            Calf prices are directly related to feed grain prices... the cheaper the feed grains are... the higher the calves go.

            Nice try GassyFox!!!

            Comment


              #7
              No, simple reality Tom - I don't sell calves I rear them on grass and forage and direct market grass-fed beef.
              Anyways with grain prices up and rising this fall compared to a year ago (around $30T Lethbridge barley at the moment)why are calves up 25%??

              Comment

              • Reply to this Thread
              • Return to Topic List
              Working...