• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

$36.7M CWB'Purchase of Capital assets'

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TOM4CWB
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2000
    • 16511

    $36.7M CWB'Purchase of Capital assets'

    Fransisco,

    We knew the CWB spent massive amounts on 423 Main in the past couple of years... did you note:

    Under 'Cash Flow from investing and other activities:

    Purchase of Capital Assets: (37,600)

    In my small mind... this is revealing that the CWB spent $37.6M this fiscal year... and $23,602M last year.

    I know it is a little tricky the way it is entered... but isn't this actually showing the CWB spent over $60M on capital assets?

    Why are there no notes showing what this was for?
  • Fransisco
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2007
    • 3859

    #2
    The question seems to answer itself, they don't want us to know what they've been buying.

    I'd like to know what the demurge charges were but again they don't tell us.

    Comment

    • TOM4CWB
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2000
      • 16511

      #3
      Page 76 Financial Results

      Exceptional?

      I agree... well stated: I take 'Exception' to the manner in which the CWB wasted our money!

      Comment

      • TOM4CWB
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2000
        • 16511

        #4
        Fransisco,

        There was Dispatch... because the CWB PAYS DEMURAGE CREDITS UP FRONT... and plans always to get a credit on the shipping.

        Chaffmeister has explained this before... the shipping companies win (big $$$)... and the CWB figures we are too stupid to know the difference!

        Comment

        • Fransisco
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2007
          • 3859

          #5
          Yes they call it 'net' dispatch with a footnote saying demurge was 'significant'. I'd like to know how significant as in give me a number please.

          Also dispatch really isn't a positive number, if they get a shipment out earlier than agreed upon they only get part of the money back. Not sure how much, could be 50%. Bottom line is that it is cheaper but it still costs us something. Nothing like pretending a negitive is a positive.

          Comment

          • parsley
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2000
            • 10986

            #6
            Renovations?

            Comment

            • ado089
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2004
              • 1754

              #7
              I though they weren't suppose to have any capital. Isn't that how their incestuious relationship keeps the grain co's and rail lines in buisness.

              Comment

              • Fransisco
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2007
                • 3859

                #8
                Renovations! Yes that's it! They are working on getting that $1300 renovations rebate from the Conservative stimulus plan.

                Comment

                • TOM4CWB
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2000
                  • 16511

                  #9
                  Fransisco,

                  You had to spend it after Jan 27/09...

                  It does not look like this capital went into the rail cars... where did it go?

                  Comment

                  • Fransisco
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 3859

                    #10
                    What, they can't get new invoices made out?

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...