Newstalk 650's Gormley flames Flaman

**jensend** · Feb 20, 2008, 12:46

i wouldn't jump on the gormley bandwagon. he makes cbc look credible.

**LWeber** · Feb 20, 2008, 12:50

You may want to ask the NDP in Saskatchewan how formidable Gormley is.

**jensend** · Feb 20, 2008, 12:58

i don't think it takes a silly secondrate talk radio host to make the ndp look bad. they got enough time and discredited themselves. if gormley was so persuasive he would have toppled them all by himself one or two elections earlier.

**boarderbloke** · Feb 20, 2008, 13:00

listened to the whole thing and I thought he(gromley)gave farmers a good kick in the a$$(again), rather than flaming flamen, so to speak.

**SASKFARMER3** · Feb 20, 2008, 19:33

I heard it too and Jsend and Border Flaman got slammed.
Its nice just to bad farmers didn't throw his A-- out last time.
We were all to busy and this useless piece of work got elected. Hm doesn't that happen most of the time.
The ones that should run don't and the Looser that has nothing else to do runs and wins.
THis fall its Lights out Flaman!!!!

**just_wondering** · Feb 20, 2008, 21:29

I heard parts of it as well, Gorrmley definitely was part of the NDP going down but his understanding of the CWB election process leaves much to be desired.
You have the CWB running adds the whole election period unlike in Fed/prov where there is no advertising.
There's the whole process of trying to ID voters when it's based on where they deliver grain rather than where they live.
Letting landlords votes cancel out real producers.
Just ask I'll go on on how to improve democracy in the CWB.
I will agree with Gormley on one thing though farmer apathy/ general disgust has made it tough to through the bum's out

**just_wondering** · Feb 20, 2008, 21:31

BTW good interview by LWeber this Am and comments in the Financial Post on the weekend.

**boarderbloke** · Feb 20, 2008, 22:12

Flaman won't leave on his own, farmers HAVE TO GET OUT VOTE ! and that's who's a$$ Gormely was kicking. there is definitely a problem with landlords and part time farmers voting. needs to be based on acres, so many cultivated acres, so many votes. just like shares, in a company!

**food4u** · Feb 20, 2008, 22:53

The voting needs to be based on the number of acres of CWB grains not total acres seeded.Have one daughter and her husband who live in McCreary's district but their mailing address is in Ritter's district and they have been unable to get this corrected.

Newstalk 650's Gormley flames Flaman