• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Censorship is alive and well in Canada

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    A little ketchup with your mustard. Anybody who believes in man-made climate change,should look a little deeper than the spewings of david suzuki.OF COURSE there is climate change! We've had dinosaurs,and ice-ages and everything in between.Long term weather patterns are far more believeable than the al gore types.A few years back it was proven that certain scientists had doctored up weather stats to make it look like global warming.Ask a climatologist who disagrees with all the lemmings about man-made climate change and he will tell u the truth about who censors who.

    Comment


      #22
      More commonsense from Stonepicker? Wahoo
      This site is definitely up-smarting. Pars

      Comment


        #23
        It not about the research it is about
        the keep your mouth shut Harper policy.
        Rick Mercer had whole list off people
        Harper has told to keep quiet. He was
        making a joke about Canada fighting for
        freedom of speech around the world. So
        now my guess you all will say Rick
        Mercer is a bum.. In fact anyone that
        speaks a differant opinion than yours is
        also a bum..In politics I have voted
        many ways and no one gets a free ride. A
        political correction is soon to come in
        Canada.

        Comment


          #24
          To Chuckchuck ok for myself I have exactly no herbicide resistance on my farm. If I did I would rotate chemicals, not sure what your talking about with the monsantos etc.

          Comment


            #25
            By a weed scientist if there is such a thing am wondering if weed scientist is another name for Green Peace fund raiser.

            Comment


              #26
              You might want to pluralize weed scientist, cause yu actually only got one weed scientist.

              Comment


                #27
                Agree 100% with the stonpicker, Tim Ball was one of them. Had more common sense data that was real and very long term. Climate change has more to do with the sun than any man made b/s

                Comment


                  #28
                  I aint no siantest and I dont realy study the weather but I will swear over the last 65yr there has been a big change in the weather as to who did it I dont know but I have seen millions of acres of forest cleared away and billions of gal of oil burned and mill acres wet land drained and if that dosent have some kind of an effect on the weather I will sure be suprised.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Stonepicker and furrowtickler: The so called climategate affaired was looked into extensively and Cleared. The denier movement took bits and pieces out of context, illegally from emails and made a story out of it.

                    Tim Ball could Tell a great Story.( I heard him a couple of times) Unfortunately he was getting big support from Exxon to push the denial of climate change and His Credentials are not what he says they are.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      <i>"where the heck is global warming?... The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't."
                      "I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. K and I will keep them out somehow-even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"
                      I wanted you guys to know that you're free to use RC </i>(realclimate.org)<i> in any way you think would be helpful. Gavin and I are going to be careful about what comments we screen through.... We can hold comments up in the queue and contact you about whether or not you think they should be screened through or not, and if so, any comments you'd like us to include.
                      [T]hink of RC as a resource that is at your disposal.... We'll use our best discretion to make sure the skeptics don't get to use the RC comments as a megaphone.</i>
                      I seriously question in what context these comments wouldn’t show a blatant disregard for their colleagues and the search for scientific truth. They were “cleared” however, so apparently that makes it OK.

                      Tim Ball gets ignored and/or slandered for questioning these jokers and the money to fight global warming…er <i>climate change</i> just keeps flowing.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...