As far as the subsidy issue I could agree they are bad.
But with my farmer hat on I could only argue that they are mostly responsible for the highest grain prices in history. How can I say with a straight face that biofuels should not be subsidized when without this NEW use we as farmers would still be producing at less than the cost of production.
This is like my holiday conversations with my socialist brother in law.
He would say "war is bad therefore we should not have war anymore".
- I would say " Bad people exist, and with out war they would rule the world"
Same argument for biofuels subsidies distort the market place, we should not have subsidies.
-Without subsidies Canada can not compete in a world where the playing field is not level. We need subsidies.
IMHO biofuels are the least market distorting way of getting there.
They have the biggest multiplier and the money flows towards the farm gate ,not away from it
But with my farmer hat on I could only argue that they are mostly responsible for the highest grain prices in history. How can I say with a straight face that biofuels should not be subsidized when without this NEW use we as farmers would still be producing at less than the cost of production.
This is like my holiday conversations with my socialist brother in law.
He would say "war is bad therefore we should not have war anymore".
- I would say " Bad people exist, and with out war they would rule the world"
Same argument for biofuels subsidies distort the market place, we should not have subsidies.
-Without subsidies Canada can not compete in a world where the playing field is not level. We need subsidies.
IMHO biofuels are the least market distorting way of getting there.
They have the biggest multiplier and the money flows towards the farm gate ,not away from it
Comment