• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Looking for Logic in the Durum FPC Versus EPO

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • charliep
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2000
    • 9002

    Looking for Logic in the Durum FPC Versus EPO

    New crop years are always fun for economists (a sad comment on our personalities) because they generate a whole new set of numbers.

    1CWAD 12.5 PRO - $275/tonne port paid at delivery (minus CWB deductions).

    1 CWAD 12.5 100 % EPO cost $23.50/tonne or $247.50 port paid to them at time of delivery (minus CWB deductions). Can particate in total payments above $275/tonne.

    1CWAD FPC payment port $253.06 (minus CWB deductions).

    Assuming the $275/tonne is a reflection of US prices adjusted to port position and a fictious program like the daily price contract for wheat, the farmer is offered $275/tonne cash price (minus deductions)?

    Which of these options should a farmer use - particularly if cash flow is important to them? A trick question.
  • charliep
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2000
    • 9002

    #2
    Mistake on my first one. Should have commented you only $144/tonne and have to wait the rest which make result in a total payment value that may be more than or less than the PRO forecast.

    Comment

    • charliep
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2000
      • 9002

      #3
      More embarassment.

      The $23.50 EPO should have been deducted from the $275/tonne. Payment would have been $251.50/tonne minus CWB deductions. The FPC with no ability to participate in better CWB total payments down the road only provides $1.56/tonne better cash flow.

      Apologize for the math mistake.

      Comment

      • Reply to this Thread
      • Return to Topic List
      Working...