• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Global ag risk solutions

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Richard5
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 469

    Global ag risk solutions

    Does any one use this?

    Tell me how you will be better off with this program in a year like this?

    If you have $80 into fert, $30 into Chem and maybe $30 into seed on avg, that's $140 in which you can buy a $100 over this for coverage. So if you gross over $240 you get nothing, if you gross zero you get a $100

    If my farm gross is only $240 I will be showing pretty big accrual loss on my financial stmts and I feel I have a good handle on equipment investment, family draw and overhead.

    And some of you complain about crop ins and agristability but I think this program is a huge money grab and pushy sales pitch
  • TOM4CWB
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2000
    • 16511

    #2
    Richard5

    I agree.

    Just paid our $154K AB crop/hail insurance bill.

    I consider this insurance to be a long term risk management program for multiyear participation.

    Our family can sleep at night.. and at a little under 10 percent CI premium with 6 percent hail to expected coverage... plus spot loss hail.

    Comment

    • JDGreen
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2008
      • 865

      #3
      If you gross zero you get $240 not $100..

      Comment

      • Oliver88
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2012
        • 4688

        #4
        For someone in a claim position for Sask Crop Insurance the choice between "Variable" and "Base" coverage could be significant this year.
        The Variable coverage is set based on the July 31st prices base coverage was set in the winter.

        I'd like to explain how GARS is better as well and provide some math examples.

        Good topic.

        Comment

        • iceman
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2014
          • 751

          #5
          The GARS guys favorite line this spring is
          "I'm spraying cause I'm covered with GARS" spray on fellas.
          New farmers or guys with no experience discounts or bad yield guarantees are the first to join. IMO they're picking the low hanging fruit.

          Out

          Comment

          • JDGreen
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2008
            • 865

            #6
            If you grew 30 bpa @ $8 = $240. Market drops to $6 x 30 = $180 now GARS owes you $60 an acre. Gars is guaranteed revenue to which you purchase your chosen level of coverage. Crop insurance is yield based coverage. Totally different. Not apples to apples.

            Comment

            • JDGreen
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2008
              • 865

              #7
              Iceman you have got to be joking. GARS won't even look at insuring you unless your highly profitable and low risk. Insurance companies aren't that stupid. Oh wait a minute crop insurance will insure anyone with a pulse speaking of low hanging fruit.

              Comment

              • iceman
                Senior Member
                • Dec 2014
                • 751

                #8
                JD Green
                It works both ways. All your pulses get hailed out and you cut 50bus of durum at 10 bucks you make $500. And than the GARS cheque rhymes with HERO.

                In crop insurance because it's per crop. You get paid their set rate on the pulses.

                Out

                Comment

                • Richard5
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2014
                  • 469

                  #9
                  Yes that was a typo on the gross zero is only a $100. Should be $240.

                  I still think on a zero production I would net out more from crop insurance and my premium would be way less than the $17 base quote once you are trying to get 100 to 125 in coverage.

                  It's also a real income reconciliation meaning that if you grow half a crop and sell from a twice the propice then that comes off the claim.

                  Although crop ins prices are a bit out of line now compared to market, you wouldn't have this same implication

                  Comment

                  • Nudge
                    Member
                    • Dec 2013
                    • 68

                    #10
                    That's exactly right jd. And GARS will insure well over 100 per over seed/fert/chem. But gotta have the track record to support it. Personally crop ins with good yield history, max experience discount and in season price are a better choice than gars.

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...