• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

As you know im anti single desk but

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • malleefarmer
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2005
    • 5424

    As you know im anti single desk but

    You system is way way different to Australia hence my lack of knowledge.

    But pre market freedom did you still have these railway issues?

    Nothing easier than here dropping it at elevator 2 hours after its harvested or bag it or sell it dairy farmer or flour mill or feed mill. But comes at a cost our freight to port 160kms is obscene at $32 per tonnebut then again no issues like you guys have and payment as quick as six days after elevating.
  • jensend
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2002
    • 1533

    #2
    its the usual story. when times are good its easy to ignore the structural problems in the system but when margins tighten up all the same old problems come back to haunt. it used to be producers could add value to their production by putting it through a livestock enterprise but with the scale of operations now you cant buy 50 loads of feeders and feed them with buckets. most of todays producers aren't mentally equipped to diversify let alone having the equipment required to have anoter enterprise.

    Comment

    • grrrr
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2004
      • 430

      #3
      Mallee-Ports are 1600kms or more away and really only three of them. Mountains in one direction and the Great Lakes in the other.

      Comment

      • CptnObvious
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2014
        • 213

        #4
        Only once in my 30 years of farming with the Wheat Board do I remember having grain left over at the end of the crop year and that was only for a couple of weeks.
        The CWB used to co-ordinate rail traffic, not perfectly but better and fairer than what we have now.
        The CWB also had the information and the power to sue the RRs( successfully) for level of service complaints. Post CWB the farmer isn't even the shipper anymore so we have no legal standing to sue.

        Comment

        • bucket
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2008
          • 17027

          #5
          Then you were obviously over contracting and had inside info on the acceptance levels.

          Comment

          • TOM4CWB
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2000
            • 16511

            #6
            CptnObvious...

            Wow... that was obviously biased!

            Yes others have taken the railways...to the CTA... and won. Nabers grain"

            "Naber wins CN fight - The Western Producer
            www.producer.com › News
            Jun 20, 2002 - A small Saskatchewan grain company has chalked up another major ... Naber could theoretically use the CTA ruling to go to court to recover."

            "Canadian Transportation Agency Concludes that CN Failed ...
            cta-otc.gc.ca/.../canadian-transportation-agency-concludes-cn-failed-fulfi...
            Feb 13, 2014 - The Agency concluded that CN 's grain handling and transportation [failed]... to provide rail service to Naber in Melfort and Star City, Saskatchewan."

            Cptn... Please check before you state incorrect biases.

            Comment

            • farmaholic
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2010
              • 17482

              #7
              ...or grew less than the minimums tonnes contractible.

              Comment

              • farmaholic
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2010
                • 17482

                #8
                Tom, but he did say it wasn't perfect. We need common ground. We need to quit lobbing shit grenades at each other. Maybe I should heed my own advice.

                Comment

                • Braveheart
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2001
                  • 3257

                  #9
                  Yes Mallee, rail problems existed before, during, and after the CWB era. It is so complicated We don't have the space to explain all the issues.

                  Capsulized: captive shippers, oligopoly, geography, shippers fear of retribution by RR, weather, farm politics, William Ackman, Hunter Harrison, Claude Mongeaux, gutless government leadership, a complete lack of accountability, a spiderweb of far flung branchlines, and . . .

                  Comment

                  • TOM4CWB
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2000
                    • 16511

                    #10
                    Cptn... I think I was distracted...

                    BTW CPTN

                    Pooling charged growers the interest costs... of waiting for letters of credit and logistics problems.. since the Initial Pymt was 55-60 percent... the CWB pooled the problem... it was still on growers account. If a CWB fixed price was contracted... the majority of the time... the basis discounted total payment by 20-40$/t... and the contingency fund was to take up problems we have now... as well.. which was also funded out of the basis and pools.

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...