Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. is calling for an end to a government-imposed limit on revenues the country’s two major railroads can make hauling grain in Western Canada, a measure designed to protect farmers from soaring shipping costs. “The removal of the [regulation] would allow for increased investment, capacity, and overall competitiveness in the grain supply chain,†said CP, noting commodity prices have risen by 166 per cent since 2000 while the railway’s freight rates have gone up by less than 6 per cent. “Canadian rail rates are the lowest in the world.†CP said removing the cap would allow it to replace its fleet of 5,500 grain cars – which average 35 years old – with new hoppers that can carry 25 per cent more grain per train. “Removing the grain revenue entitlement is a risky proposition,†said Wade Sobkowich, president of the Western Grain Elevator Association, which includes Cargill Ltd. and Richardson International Ltd. The grain group said the rule does not prevent railways from moving more grain, nor investing in hopper cars. The rule, they say, simply limits the amount the railways can charge per tonne – not the overall amount of revenue it can make from moving crops – and ensures the rise in freight rates is in line with inflation. “There is no evidence to show that shippers would get better service if it were eliminated. In fact, there is existing evidence that poor service and insufficient capacity would remain,†Mr. Sobkowich said. Claude Mongeau, CN’s chief executive officer, told the Globe and Mail last year the revenue rule discouraged spending on its grain operations. Mark Hallman, a CN spokesman, said the Montreal-based company had not yet made its submission to the review panel, and would not elaborate on its contents nor comment on the freight rate regulation. “CN’s submission to the panel will focus on what is required, including the proper regulatory regime, to help all sectors contribute to Canada’s trade and economic growth, and on the importance of a commercial environment to sustain investments and innovation,†Mr. Hallman said in a statement.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
CP rail on the cap
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
said CP, noting commodity prices have risen by 166 per cent since 2000 while the railway’s freight rates have gone up by less than 6 per cent.
Great quote from a CP official.
-
Wheat is at the same price levels at 1975. Canola is 15% higher then 1985. I suspect fright rates have risen more then that...So easy to cherry pick.
Comment
-
I think these promises were made with the end of the crow rate?
They are guaranteed profit in the current system. If they haven't made investment with their profit to make themselves more efficient, how is changing the rules going to help?
Farmers overpaid for railcar maintenance for years.
These changes are coming, it's a given.
My MP David Anderson asked me over a year ago if I would like to pay commercial rates. That's the way they justified the cluster**** last year is by making sure everyone knew that the revenue cap was a problem. Maybe it is or isn't but until they put in a well defined commercial system that works. Why change it?
Until the appropriate people start paying the demurage charges and level of service agreement are in place so that farmers don't pay for everyone's incompetence, you don't see much gain.
Comment
-
Good grief, when has the freight cost to move something ever been directly tied to the value of the goods being moved?
Is the rate per tonne less to haul a load of oats compared to a load of flax?
Comment
-
Interesting......
CN and CP are not interested in investing in their grain shipping business unless they gouge farmers more.
Meanwhile their shares keep growing.
Problem:
Duopoly isn't getting the job done, we need more competition.
Solution:
What we need is another railway company interested in shipping grain with the existing rules.
Comment
-
Here's the numbers...
<a href="http://photobucket.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1211.photobucket.com/albums/cc421/farming101/CTA%20CPR%20Maximum%20Revenue%20Entitlement_zpsz4u othws.jpg" border="0" alt=" photo CTA CPR Maximum Revenue Entitlement_zpsz4uothws.jpg"/></a>
From 2000 till this past year rail freight rates per tonne under the MREP have increased by 24.97% NOT "less than 6%".
The only way the 6% increase could be right is if the rate for grain moved OUTSIDE the revenue entitlement program has gone DOWN. What are the chances of that?
Comment
-
Hit the nail on the head bucket until everybody is held accountable their will be no fairness in the system everybody quite happy to pass the buck back to the farmer!!
Comment
-
Bill Ackman of pershing square was the best performing hedge fund of 2014,his second top performer was CP,he was the guy that went in and restructured the company.
Comment
-
An "open season on farmers" is what the railways want.If the feds allow this to happen, there should not be a tory MP elected in the rural area west of the Ont/Man border!! As has been said many times, "an increase in rates is no guarantee of better service".
Comment
-
the railroads got exactly what they ask for .
cost, plus profit, plus return on investment, formula
and i can well imagine how they can fudge cost figures.
and as usual , some how now, it is not rich enough for them.
it just tells you how vulnerable
we are on every front.
another monopoly will get to decide our freight rate .
another thing ,
i sure would like to kick the ass
of who ever thought( Cap ) was a good name
for the program.
it does not cap their revenues at all.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment