• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Islamists

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Edit to my previous post "The Mortal Storm" with James Stewart.
    Islam is the fastest growing religion in Canada and an estimated 1.25 million in Canada and increases by approximately 60,000 immigrants per year.
    The largest mosque in North America is in Calgary.

    Comment


      #42
      This utube flirts with moral cowardice, burnt , a term not often referred to, these days. No inference intended. Just an interesting listen.

      http://youtu.be/B3-Xl0J9UjI

      pars

      Comment


        #43
        PS
        for you Charliep

        Islam is not a visible minority. Every skin.color in society, and every language in society, world-wide, has represention in Islam, all of them praying to Allah. BUT, and this is the point I made at the beginning of this thread, Islam is also governed by the socio-political-ideology called Sharia Law, which is the legislative arm of Islam not reconcilable with Western culture.


        Until Sharia Law is revamped, has a tune-up, or is legally revised, or rebuilt, immigration requests from the hot-spots of Islam must be denied.
        Parsley

        Comment


          #44
          parsley. that i am sorry to say will never happen. they are using the same laws that we ceated to better life here in north america for all who come here to have a better life against us. quite a conundrum isnt it. trying to call islam what it is cost ezra lavant what? eighty grand is his loss of a defamation law suit launched by khurrum awan for an article in mcleans magazine depicting the results of islam in society. because of freedom of religion it seems they can trumph freedom of speech.

          Comment


            #45
            binthere, It sea like you are saying, "What's the use?"


            Canada supposedly chooses immigrants, whom we want to allow entry, from the list of applicants who want to enter.

            But citizens have been very passive about contacting their MP's about who we NEED as new Canadians. As well as who we PREFER.

            Do we want English speaking employees? Do we want immigrants from G8 countries? G20? Commonwealth counties? Third world? Islamist countries? Mandarin-speaking? Northern countries? North American?

            Who do we WANT?

            At one time, rich immigrants simply put cash on the table if they wanted to jump the que. And they did. Remember?

            Should we court people who suit our way of life, or merely those we feel sorry for? Sound or disabled? Professional or blue collar? Men or women? Youth or middle-aged? Bi-polar needing meds or sound and healthy? Skilled or unskilled?

            Cndn political parties often court votes by holding out immigration-candy; a tactically successful on cultural groups.

            Many countries know exactly who they want.

            Saudi Arabia won't accept any refugees. NZ doesn't want immigrants. China won't allow some ethnics. Switzerland wallows in neutrality. And I'd swear Canada chooses new Canadians by pulling names from a hat in the prisons of the world.

            Canada gets what we don't ask for. How many Canadians have asked for militant imams from Pakistan? Convicted terrorists from Syria.

            I've been lax as hell when it comes to immigration. But I do know this,.. 10K letters from Mr, RegularJoes like you and I, piled up on the Immigration Ministers desk, would definitely influence selection-decisions. imho

            Tending our country's safety is particularly important during this time of unrest.

            Switch to second gear and do your civic duty: be involved. Pars

            Comment


              #46
              excellent points parsley. however we fell asleep at the gate. the trojan horse was let in. our multicultural policies so well intended but unfortunatley misguided will be our achilles heel. do we have it in us as a country to sacrifice what it will take.

              Comment


                #47
                I think you underestimate parents and grandparents and families. We will do it for our children and grandchildren and our families.
                And I think deep down inside, we know that

                We can close the gates now, before we are flooded with newcomers who openly vow to kill us. Parsley.

                Comment


                  #48
                  Question most people should ask themselves. How far do you allow someone to push you before you take a stand and push back.

                  How many values, morals, beliefs and customs do you have to forfeit in the name of politically correctness or for fear of offending "MINORITIES".

                  I am of European descent, there are lingering customs, but I am a Canadian first. Are we going
                  to unravel the fabric of what is means to be Canadian for every special interest group that comes along?

                  Ask yourselves, how "accommodating" would some other cultures and countries be if we placed the same demands on them that are being placed on us?

                  Some basic principles between cultures have trouble existing together let alone beside each other.

                  The world supplies some good natural barriers, use them.

                  Your Local Neighborhood Racist.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Push. Push. Shove. shove, shove, Shove. Attack..,,,,,

                    Hmmmm. Is this, that, to which you refer, farm?

                    In Texas? In 2015? :


                    Quote
                    Breitbart Report: Texas Islamic Tribunal Dispenses Shariah Law

                    By James Morrison
                    Tuesday, 27 Jan 2015 16:35 PM

                    A form of Islamic law has taken force in Texas, right next door to Louisiana where Gov. Bobby Jindal has warned of Muslim immigrants who refuse to adopt Western culture.

                    An Islamic Tribunal of four attorneys is operating in Dallas where it issues voluntary rulings on civil disputes, Breitbart Texas reported Tuesday.

                    Taher El-badawi, one of the lawyers who call themselves "judges," told the conservative website that the tribunal applies Shariah law to litigants who voluntarily accept their rulings on disputes involving family and business issues.

                    He cited divorce as an example of the need for a ruling by Shariah jurists.

                    "While participation in the tribunal is voluntary, a married couple cannot be considered divorced by the Islamic community unless it is granted by the tribunal," El-badawi told Breitbart Texas.

                    He conceded that Islamic law treats men and women unequally. A man can come directly to the tribunal for a divorce, but a woman seeking to end her marriage must go to a religious leader, or imam, who will bring her case for divorce to the tribunal, he said.

                    El-badawi added that litigants who are dissatisfied with the rulings of the tribunal can take their cases to Texas civil courts. But, the Islamic Tribunal warns on its website that American justice is expensive.

                    The courts of the United States of America are costly and consist of ineffective lawyers. Discontent with the legal system leads many Muslims in America to postpone justice in this world and opt for an audience on the Day of Judgment," the tribunal says.

                    The news of a functioning Shariah court in the United States comes as Jindal is making news by warning about the threat of Muslim immigrants who refuse to assimilate into Western culture.

                    "In the West, non-assimilationist Muslims establish enclaves and carry out as much of Shariah law as they can without regard for the laws of the democratic countries which provided them a new home," Jindal said last week in a speech in London.

                    "It is startling to think that any country would allow, even unofficially, for a so called 'no-go zone.' The idea that a free country would allow for specific areas of its country to operate in an autonomous way that is not free and is in direct opposition to its laws is hard to fathom". Unquote. Pars

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...