• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Trade Retaliation

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hopalong
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 1244

    Trade Retaliation

    Just do not get it with retaliation being seen as a solution in trade agreement disputes.

    For Canada, as a trading nation, better to lean towards free and open trade and reducing our own barriers rather than increasing them in response to actions like U.S. COOL legislation.

    Our consumers and tax payers lose more than selected groups gain from retaliatory tariffs.
  • bucket
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2008
    • 17033

    #2
    The US is wrong, and many in the states are asking their own government to change it.

    The US has backed Canada into a corner, not sure they have any choice.

    Bending over and continue taking it doesn't seem like the right choice.

    Comment

    • Oliver88
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2012
      • 4688

      #3
      The US is breaking the law with COOL so I hope we retaliate to send a message.

      Premier Wall, Lyle Stewart and Ritz said they will consider retaliation.

      Comment

      • sumdumguy
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2007
        • 12012

        #4
        Its like a Chiququa yipping at a Greyhound bus.

        Comment

        • fjlip
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2002
          • 9879

          #5
          Close oil/gas taps, might get their attention. Not much else hurts them as much as us. Too big, self focused, protectionist, to notice anyone else

          Comment

          • Maggs
            Junior Member
            • Jan 2008
            • 9

            #6
            Mr. Ritz cracker is going to put the hammer down.We will no longer bringing mattresses in from Minnesota.

            Comment

            • Crazyharrows
              Member
              • Oct 2014
              • 38

              #7
              This goverment can't even fine the railways you think they will take on the Washington they have no balls they will fold like a cheap suit !!!

              Comment

              • bucket
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2008
                • 17033

                #8
                They have already folded and failed on both files.

                CN has said they are going to court.

                After the first ruling on COOL they should have implemented retaliatory actions.


                But cattle prices are up so they can cover their incompetence.

                Railway issues have been ignored by focusing on the sale of the cwb.

                Divide and conquer or bend over and take it. Same difference.

                Comment

                • Hopalong
                  Senior Member
                  • Apr 2013
                  • 1244

                  #9
                  There is no doubt that old CWB was a trade irritant.
                  Heard it first hand from farmers in USA and Great Britain.
                  Canada's support for supply managed marketing boards is another one.
                  Have to question Ritz and Harper position on that one.

                  Comment

                  • Hopalong
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 1244

                    #10
                    When in England a few years ago, took time to look for a farm once owned by great grandfather.
                    Was referred to a local farmer-historian who drove me around.
                    It was in an area that had bomber bases in World War Two and this man expressed gratitude to the Canadians who served and many who made supreme sacrifice.
                    He had opposite views on Canadian Wheat Board and thought it unfair competition.
                    Somewhat dismaying that other posters support retaliation and fighting back rather than negotiation as a way to avoid trade wars.

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...