Here's one for Zen Hunnicutt and Dr Huber et al
If 30% of lactating mothers have claimed glyphosate in their milk...and that puny sample coming largely from a small professed organically food conscious "population"
Just why wouldn't milk producing cows fed glyphosate resistant rations have levels with very high residues. In fact I would think that a "yellow feed" diet experiment(ie. glyphosate chemically killed forage) would produce an excellent experimental study that would put Zen Hunnicutt's theory in its proper place in one damn hurry.
As it sits now, Zen et al have zero credibilty with their supposed research.
It was only months ago that that same group claimed GMO corn had hugely less nutrients and the results were apparently based on soil analysis techniques. There was no sensible test techniques and the "study" was a complete farse on all counts
Now we have a mere 10 test results and an insinuation that the real residue sitaution is probably much worse in the general population; but not one test result presented that would even lead any person to that conclusion. For all anyone knows; those few samples could have been doctored to produce the groups desired results.
Such news releases belong in the National Enquirer.
So is the dairy industry producing groosly contaminated milk. Why wouldn't that be an obvious claim for those irresponsible persons to also make??? Now that should make some real headlines and maybe quickly prove once and for all if those persons are prophets or dangerous quacks.
If 30% of lactating mothers have claimed glyphosate in their milk...and that puny sample coming largely from a small professed organically food conscious "population"
Just why wouldn't milk producing cows fed glyphosate resistant rations have levels with very high residues. In fact I would think that a "yellow feed" diet experiment(ie. glyphosate chemically killed forage) would produce an excellent experimental study that would put Zen Hunnicutt's theory in its proper place in one damn hurry.
As it sits now, Zen et al have zero credibilty with their supposed research.
It was only months ago that that same group claimed GMO corn had hugely less nutrients and the results were apparently based on soil analysis techniques. There was no sensible test techniques and the "study" was a complete farse on all counts
Now we have a mere 10 test results and an insinuation that the real residue sitaution is probably much worse in the general population; but not one test result presented that would even lead any person to that conclusion. For all anyone knows; those few samples could have been doctored to produce the groups desired results.
Such news releases belong in the National Enquirer.
So is the dairy industry producing groosly contaminated milk. Why wouldn't that be an obvious claim for those irresponsible persons to also make??? Now that should make some real headlines and maybe quickly prove once and for all if those persons are prophets or dangerous quacks.