• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Recycle... NO MORE PLASTIC BAGS in T.O.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Recycle... NO MORE PLASTIC BAGS in T.O.

    Has this world gone nuts?

    I think so... soon we will only be allowed to eat at restaurants...

    Conservation? I really wonder... what about cleaning the cloth bags... water used... electricity... soap....

    Interesting example about water down under.... water parks etc... $$M of infrastructure set up...

    Wheatbelt towns to get stormwater storage

    Story Added : 07th June 2012



    The Minister for Agriculture and Food says several towns in Western Australia's wheatbelt will benefit from a proposal to trap and store stormwater for irrigation.

    The $2 million project will conserve stormwater for use on amenities like parks and sporting ovals.

    The exact location of the storage devices has not yet been determined but will be chosen on a needs basis.

    Minister Terry Redman says if the program is successful it is possible it could be implemented in other regional communities.

    "This will be an initiative to try and assist those communities to keep water on their ovals, to keep it green, to keep the amenities looking such a way that it is going to attract and keep people in their communities," he said.

    "So it's got a social outcome and certainly a regional development outcome.

    "Hopefully we can repeat it around the place in future years."

    Mr Redman says rural communities that find it difficult to meet the cost of irrigation in summer will benefit from the plan.

    "When you have summer storms go through, there's a whole heap of rain that literally runs off and goes down the creeks," he said.

    "This is going to be putting in place some sort of catchment facility so that that water can be reused at different times of the year to be able to put on to all those other areas that support the social amenity, which is so critical to those these small regional communities."

    Wheatbelt Natural Resource Management says it will work with the Department of Agriculture and Food to deliver the project.

    The group says any town that is considering applying needs to already have established water management plans.

    The acting CEO of the group, Natasha Woods, says there is strong community support for the project.

    "We know the community wants to do this," she said.

    "The Department of Water did a ring around the 35 shires that are in our wheatbelt area a couple of years back to see who was doing water recycling and who wanted to do more. The answer was just about everyone's already doing it and every single place wants to do more."

    She says the towns will be chosen based on specific criteria.

    "We will be getting on board an officer who will be setting up a list of selection criteria so that towns can apply," she said.

    "We've got a rough idea who it will be. We're only interested in working with towns in the first instance that have established water management plans.

    "So they already know about their water balance and what will be best for their town."

    http://www.efarming.com.au/News/agricultural/07/06/2012/171632/wheatbelt-towns-to-get-stormwater-storage.html

    #2
    Vacations and Tourism should be outlawed... unproductive use of energy etc...

    Comment


      #3
      You have to ask if the world is nuts?
      YES!

      Comment


        #4
        Tom: Provincial government money spent on tourism should be eliminated. If and when you get elected in Alberta please see to it that the millions wasted promoting tourism is curtailed. That money would be better spent on better food for the seniors in this province who are being fed slop in the various health care facilities throughout the province.

        Money spent on tourism is like pouring money down a black hole with little or no return except for a few well connected operators of tourist traps.

        Comment


          #5
          dont really get your point tom?
          our local town population 550/600 all
          storm water of roads etc is stored in
          local dams and used to irrigate spoting
          facilities, school spoting grounds
          school ag projects etc and if need be
          supplies drinking water but everybody
          catches there own water of there roofs.
          Yes plastics bags have bben banned here
          for about 5 yrs now in australia maybe
          more.
          anyway i still dont get your point and
          its got a fair bit to with price of
          wheat and canola i think but cant quite
          find the connection there either

          Comment


            #6
            Mallee,

            We have no public infrastructure help to conserve water for irrigation projects on our local farms... while environmentalists seek to stop such projects in our part of the country.

            Keeping grass green instead of growing crops...seems to be somewhat ironic.

            I do not get the bag thing. Washing and buying the cloth bags that weigh many times more than plastic... plastic which can be easily recycled... leaves common sense stranded... Hmmmm

            Comment


              #7
              the above article is nothing to with
              irrigation for farms all public works

              Comment


                #8
                Come on TOM you are BS'ing our Australian friend
                again, so much for no Government support:

                "In all, 13 irrigation districts were formed in
                subsequent years, with capitalization and operating
                expenses shared by the provincial and federal
                governments as well as the districts themselves."

                "Though irrigation continued to grow as both an
                economic and a social force, returns on investments
                during the 1920s were not as high as anticipated. To
                keep the industry growing, and because it was felt
                benefits would accrue to society as a whole, the
                provincial and federal governments agreed to fund all
                major capital works. They also helped pay some of
                the debts which had been incurred by the farmer
                cooperatives and private corporations in building the
                existing infrastructure"

                "By the beginning of the 1970s, the federal
                government felt it had achieved its goal of stabilizing
                irrigation in Alberta and transferred most of its
                interests to the province. The province thus assumed
                even greater responsibility for rehabilitation and
                expansion of the distribution infrastructure. As part
                of a cost-sharing program with the irrigation
                districts, the Alberta government paid 86% of
                construction expenses and provided engineering and
                agrological services"

                "In 1976, with the initiation of the Alberta Heritage
                Trust Fund, more money was allocated for irrigation
                capital works. (In 1995, the cost-sharing formula was
                changed. The provincial government now pays 75% of
                rehabilitation costs, and the irrigation districts pay
                25%."

                Another Alberta success story, but hardly a product
                of free enterprise and no Government involvement.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Grassfarmer,

                  You may live in or near an irrigation district... we certainly do NOT.

                  Exactly how does our farm benefit from irrigation?

                  Does yours?

                  Mayor Ford of T.O. thought the plastic bag law was bad law as well.

                  What will be next?

                  Disposable diapers? No more 2L pop? Outlaw Christmas Trees?

                  How about stopping air travel... and outlawing Limos/SUV's while they are at it!

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Tom you forgot about 20 ounce soda pops. (rolling eyes)


                    I would like to see a complete ban on the addition of sugar and/or cream and cream substitutes to coffee and tea. It would call it the double double law. Think of all of the calories this would prevent people from ingesting, and think of all of the time it would save society, millions of people no having to add and stir each day. Do I have any supporters? This is all dumb (shaking of head)

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...