ColevilleH2S?

[checking]

I'm thinking that you may have gotten one thing correct in your March 8 post. "Council sat down".

The remainder of your post is the minimum of what you and I would expect as ratepayers of an RM or county. Those thoughts didn't happen, and I suggest didn't enter this Council's thought pattern. I believe Council looked at this ratepayers land only from the angle of it being a liability to the RM.

This public deal, done in secret, suggests a large accountability gap by this Council. They should hang their collective heads in shame on this alone, but their arrogance continues.

Where is the disclosure for what is needed to right this ship?

[ColevilleH2S]

Did I miss something? Are they expropriating someones land?

[checking]

You have missed something IMO if you believe it is acceptable to sell your private property to Company A and then as councillor sit in on discussions and vote on selling public land to the same Company A.

To me it's perception, perception, perception. My trust doesn't extent this far. Perhaps yours does.

Neither does the issue of secrecy. Council's that have nothing to hide from their ratepayers, hide nothing.