• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Grain War Serves No Purpose , Editorial WFP

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Grain War Serves No Purpose , Editorial WFP

    Editorials
    Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

    Grain war serves no purpose
    By: Staff Writer

    Posted: 12/26/2011 1:00 AM |

    Eight former directors of the Canadian Wheat Board are plowing ahead in their bid to reverse the Harper government's decision to eliminate the board's monopoly, or at least to make it pay a price for the way it achieved its goals. Regrettably, their crusade is starting to look personal, even vindictive.

    It's a war they cannot win, yet they carry on, apparently hoping for some moral victory, which itself would be hollow.

    Before the wheat board officially changed hands earlier this month from a farmer-directed organization to a government operation, it had achieved some success when a court ruled that Ottawa failed to follow the law in the way it dismantled the monopoly. The decision was worthwhile in reminding the Crown that it, too, is subject to the rule of law.

    But the time for legal manoeuvring is over. Even if a court were to grant an injunction that suspended the new legislation, which seems unlikely, it would only apply in Manitoba since the application is being heard by a provincial, not a federal, court. Finally, Parliament could merely amend its legislation to make it lawful.

    One way or another, the monopoly is finished and farmers are already rushing to sign forward contracts with private grain companies, such as Viterra Inc. and Richardson International Ltd., both of which, incidentally, expect to hire more employees.

    According to some reports, the price of high-quality Prairie wheat has already risen to American levels as a result of the new open market, although obviously values will fluctuate over time.

    The new Canadian Wheat Board is willing and able to represent farmers who prefer to deal with it, rather than the private sector.

    Unfortunately, the continuing legal action may cause some uncertainty among Prairie grain farmers, but there is no need for any hesitancy. The new crop year starts Aug. 1, when the legal landscape will be much clearer. Even if a court were to put a hold on private contracts, the wheat board could simply take them over until the matter is settled.

    But the quickest way to end the last vestiges of doubt that may exist is for the former wheat board directors to abandon their lost cause and make peace with the new, open market.

    Prairie farmers are intelligent and resilient, and they will succeed.

    #2
    Two Thumbs up.

    Comment


      #3
      The editorial was written by someone,
      who has been drinking buckets, no
      barrels of rummie based egg knogg.
      Drivel like this should be outlawed, not
      foisted on us simple, simple, Comedian
      framers wit tiny brains and access ta
      mind bogling technology. I pods, gps,
      home pcs, wes thinks that wes ready ta
      play wit the big boys. Butt me tinks it
      is likely wes gonna get buttf#$$ked by
      the americans again!!!!!

      Comment


        #4
        Hey AdamSmith,

        Didn't Goodale say that if 'Humpty' fell off the wall... NO ONE could ever put him back together again???

        Doesn't this mean the 'Single Desk' is caput... done like Christmas Dinner... and the irreversible deed has been done???

        Or were those all 'MisTruths' Goodale was telling us... layer upon layer!

        Wow... are we ever gullible easy marks ...(in Goodale's mind)

        Comment


          #5
          "Regrettably, their crusade is starting to look personal, even vindictive."

          Had these crazy 8 buffoons worked constructively with the minister, they probably could have negotiated a decent severance package for themselves,

          but regrettably that would have required logic based pragmatic thinking which clearly is a concept the crazy 8 are most unfamiliar with.

          Comment


            #6
            Obviously Burbert... OH...are you Ralfy G... himself Burbert... or are you just a 'reasonable facsimile' of Goodale and what he stands for?

            Comment


              #7
              Its not so much a war as it is a bunch of geezers throwing spit balls.

              Comment


                #8
                Franny,

                They have CWB 'Chew'... they found out their chew is now lacking the power it had

                Comment


                  #9
                  Below a letter to the editor from Mr. Korneychuk.
                  Unfortunately the idea of miss truths and fear mongering is ok with the group of 8 yet any one else who tries to represent an honest opinion, and who has debated the issue with farmers for decades is naturally the one who is lying.
                  Great editorial, it is a personal fight for some, has been for quite some time. Many things could have been accomplished had the group of 8 actually listened to farmers.
                  It's great to know we've moved past that now. I respect Mr. White and Mr. Johnston for now taking charge and working to create a CWB that will truly earn farmers business.


                  CWB: What's next?


                  By Kyle Korneychuk, The Leader-Post December 26, 2011



                  Federal Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz's idea of democracy regarding grain marketing freedom for Western Canadian farmers is, from start to finish, delusional and farcical.

                  Farmers were never properly consulted; there were no public meetings. Ritz maintains the ludicrous idea that sending out publicly funded mailings to farmers is consultation.

                  There was also no cost-benefit analysis of this policy change. Where is this comprehensive plan, Minister Ritz? If it exists, can everyone see the benefits?

                  If Bill C-18 really has such widespread support, as Ritz continues to claim, then there should be absolutely no issue with holding a vote. But this continues to be ignored - no doubt because Ritz and his shadow farm groups have something to fear.

                  With no analysis and farmer vote, how can anyone confidently conclude this monumental change will provide an advantage to farmers?

                  Yet this underlies Ritz's campaign and stance. He has spread untruths throughout this debate and, ultimately, he and his fellow Conservatives have taken away the democratic right from farmers. Not allowing farmers to vote on their marketing agency is unCanadian!

                  Canadians, and not just farmers, should be seriously asking themselves where this will stop - and what's next?

                  Kyle Korneychuk, Pelly
                  © Copyright (c) The Regina Leader-Post

                  Read more: http://www.leaderpost.com/What next/5910249/story.html#ixzz1hfaH9ZCv

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Next step should be to change the name if the Canadian Wheat Board to "The Harper Government Grain Board" as the CWB as we knew it is kaput.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Is the campaign slogan changing now from 'Stop the Steamroller'
                      to What's next'?

                      When will the fear mongering stop? How can Kyle argue his
                      choice has been taken away when he now has the same choice as
                      every other farmer. Use the new CWB or not. That is choice, not
                      voting if my farm gets to choose where to sell our grain.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Did Kyle have this writen for him by his shadow "partners"? Seems to be very similar to the talking points put forward by the nfu and unions.

                        How dare the federal government of the day give freedom of choice and association BACK to the farmers it took it away from 70 years ago! The unmitigated gall!!!

                        What's next? Giving power and decision making back to the provinces for things that were stripped away over the past 40 years? Terrible!

                        Comment

                        • Reply to this Thread
                        • Return to Topic List
                        Working...