• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Story about Viterra grading problems in Australia

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chuckChuck
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2006
    • 12821

    Story about Viterra grading problems in Australia

    http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2011/02/04/3129863.htm

    4 February, 2011 8:13AM ACDT
    Grain growers and State Opposition want answers

    About 140 grain growers have attended a meeting at Tailem Bend to put questions to officials of the grain handling business, Viterra.

    Many who delivered grain to the Tailem Bend silos last month think their harvest was undervalued because of the grading techniques used by Viterra.

    They are also angry there were long delays to unload grain.

    Leighton Huxtable from Karoonda was unimpressed with Viterra's responses to farmers' concerns.

    "It just goes to show that when a company has got a monopoly like they have and they will treat growers as they have his year and they will continue to treat growers like that until we do something about it," he said.

    Viterra says it had broadened its post-harvest review in response to farmers' concerns.

    The meeting discussed a possible class action against Viterra over the payments farmers received.

    One grower said he had been advised by a QC that any action would cost at least $2.5 million.

    Michael Schaeffer from the the South Australian Farmers Federation believes it would not help mend the relationship.

    "If a class action goes ahead it certainly hinders our ability to negotiate and get Viterra to act in a far better manner into the future," he said.

    Opposition call for committee

    It has been suggested by the South Australian Opposition that a Parliamentary Select Committee needs to be established to handle this year's record grain harvest.

    Opposition spokesperson for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Adrian Pederick, says the difficulties posed by a harvest this large need to be given special consideration.

    "I would like to see the terms of reference include an examination of delays in delivery of grain, classification methods and competition within the grain storage and handling sector.'

    Mr Pederick announced today that he will be moving a motion in Parliament next Tuesday to establish the Select Committee.

    'Yet again the current Government is not interested in backing our state's farmers. I intend to give them the hearing they want on this issue,' Mr Pederick said.
  • gregpet
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2007
    • 770

    #2
    Sure glad we have the CGC in Canada
    so this would not be an issue here.

    Comment

    • Hopperbin
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2007
      • 6562

      #3
      Feb. 4? So is there any news after the fact? Should be by now. What does Mallee have to say? Do they keep delivery samples like our elevators so we can dispute grades and or dockage?

      You did mention that there was a problem with a monopoly here, what is up with that?

      Comment

      • Hopperbin
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2007
        • 6562

        #4
        In your story is only one silo or grain gathering station or point. Not so uncommon. The farmers have risen up, this is from Feb. 4, so what has happened since?

        Comment

        • gregpet
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2007
          • 770

          #5
          Only news i could find.

          <a
          href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/storie
          s/2011/03/10/3159953.htm?
          site=riverland">Grain handling inquiry
          wins support</a>

          Comment

          • gregpet
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2007
            • 770

            #6
            [URL="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/03/10/3159953.htm?site=riverland%22%3EGrain%22"]Grain handling inquiry wins support[/URL]

            Comment

            • farmaholic
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2010
              • 17482

              #7
              Gregpet;
              Regarding the CGC, my experience with the harvest sample program has the CGC grading my representative samples poorer than what the local terminals are willing to give me. I realize you have to take into account what the terminals have in store to work with but most times they give me a better grade than the CGC does. Once, the CGC actually got my shipped malt barley regraded from feed to malt because the locked box sample(what I delivered) was better than what the elevator shipped on my behalf(admixture problems{wheat}).
              Overall I don't think the CGC will be our savior. The problem will be a possible consolidation of the grain buyers and lack of competition. I hope the smaller Inland Terminal Companies will be able to hold their own after 08-2012.

              Comment

              • malta
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2011
                • 245

                #8
                "It just goes to show that when a company has got a monopoly like they have and they will treat growers as they have his year and they will continue to treat growers like that until we do something about it," he said.

                We are doing something about it, we are dumping the monopoly.

                Comment

                • oneoff
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 3007

                  #9
                  I totally agree with malta's point. In fact, he/she beat me to making it. Perhaps chuck et al will someday see the correlation and similarity between the Australian Viterra situation and the Canadian CWB method of operation regarding the statement

                  "It just goes to show that when a company has got a monopoly like they have and they will treat growers as they have his year and they will continue to treat growers like that until we do something about it," he said.

                  Comment

                  • malleefarmer
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2005
                    • 5424

                    #10
                    what has happened since is falling numbers machines at all major sites.

                    alternate storage and handling at tailembend is in the wind, please read some previous posts.

                    was all basically done visually at tailembend last year nearest site with falling numbers was about 120kms away inland ie going against the frieght

                    monoplolys are full of piss and wind and treat farmers with disdain and doubt our intelligence.

                    there was a canadian guy there from viterra not mayo but high up and he said and i quote "in all my years of bussiness ive never seen such a angry mob,think i will have to watch my back as i leave" he joked

                    and ps mr huxtable is my best mate lives up the road about 60kms.

                    watch this space

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...