• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The NEW Royal Canada!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    The NEW Royal Canada!

    Harper spins a new brand of patriotism

    Jane Taber’s Ottawa, From Saturday's Globe and Mail, Posted on Friday, August 19, 2011 7:06 PM EDT



    Stephen Harper is working to recast the Canadian identity, undoing 40 years of a Liberal narrative and instead creating a new patriotism viewed through a conservative lens. Restoring the “royal” prefix to the navy and air force this week is just part of the Prime Minister’s attempt at “creating a new frame” for Canada and Canadians. The Liberals embraced the Charter, the flag, peacekeeping and multiculturalism. Now, the Harper Tories are pursuing symbols and areas ignored by the Grits – the Arctic, the military, national sports and especially the monarchy, according to senior Tories.

    For Mr. Harper and his Conservatives, the payoffs could be great: a new pride in the country, an ability to shape the view of new Canadians and, politically, the potential to marginalize the Official Opposition NDP, who could be forced more and more to defend Quebec’s interests against all others. Quebeckers are not as supportive of national symbols and the monarchy as is the rest of Canada.

    This, some Tories hope, will be a Harper legacy. “What we’re seeing is the emergence of a new patriotism or at the very least a small-c conservative alternative to the established Liberal narrative about Canada,” says Patrick Muttart, the former deputy chief of staff to Mr. Harper and key election strategist, who now works for a public strategy firm in Chicago. Dean Del Mastro, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister, says this is about restoring Canada’s national identity which has been “lost.” Canada is more, he says, than hockey, “saying ‘eh’ a lot” and drinking Tim Horton’s coffee.

    The Harper strategy was set in motion some time ago. Before the last election campaign, Pierre Poilievre, an Ottawa MP and Mr. Del Mastro’s predecessor, was asked to write a section for the Conservative’s platform dealing with the theme of “standing on guard for the country” and “renewed patriotism founded in our traditions.” What he came up with, and what the Tories ran on, was the broader theme of “Here for Canada” that “had as a key part of it the restoration, the renewal of our historic memory,” Mr. Poilievre told The Globe Friday.

    For cost-conscious Tories, Mr. Poilievre notes that this is “one area where you can really affect the country without spending much money.” Restoring the “royal” prefix is part of this, too. And there will be more, he says – the commemoration of the 200th anniversary of the War of 1812; celebrations of Queen Elizabeth’s Diamond Jubilee next year and the 150th anniversary of the Charlottetown conference coming up in 2014.

    There are little things the Prime Minister does, too. Next week he travels to the Arctic for his annual visit, reinforcing his government’s view of the importance of the North. In October, he is planning to attend the opening hockey game of the returning NHL team, the Winnipeg Jets.

    Another piece of the Tory strategy was the release in March of the latest edition of the government’s citizenship guide. Chock full of references to the Queen, Canadian history and the military, it is how new Canadians, who have been aggressively courted by the Harper government, learn about what it means to be a citizen. No surprise that it was directed, in part, by two men, who share the Prime Minister’s passion for the monarchy, history and national symbols: Immigration Minister Jason Kenney and his senior adviser, Chris Champion, who last year published the book, The Strange Demise of British Canada: The Liberals and Canadian Nationalism 1964 - 1968.

    Canadian historian Jack Granatstein, meanwhile, is miffed by the Harper strategy. He thinks restoring the “royal” prefix is a throwback to colonial times and is rewriting history. “Nobody was pushing for this,” he says. “The idea of rolling back the national symbols to make them more British is just loony. Who does Harper think he’s appealing to? The NDP has attacked this move as has the Bloc [Québécois] so maybe he’s made his enemies come out. “But I’m not his enemy and I’ve come out.”

    The real enemy appears to be the NDP. Former Harper mentor and chief of staff Tom Flanagan says the effect of the “royal” restoration is twofold: It plays to the Harper base but it “also discomfits the NDP, with their big Quebec caucus, since the monarchy is less popular in Quebec than elsewhere.”

    Look for more of the same, says the University of Calgary political science professor, pointing also to the government’s plan to add more seats to Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia but not to Quebec. “If the NDP repeatedly defends Quebec and public-sector unions, against all other considerations, they may solidify their core vote but will cut off their prospects for growth,” he says. “It could turn into a Conservative utopia.”

    You have got to just LOVE this Country!

    God Bless Canada!

    #2
    Instead of Royal Canadian Navy, we should call it the Imperial Canadian Navy, that's badass.

    Comment


      #3
      Imperial Canadian Navy? I'd have to break ou my samurai sword and dust off my copy of bushido.

      Comment


        #4
        All in prep for the dismantling of farmer controled CWB only to become Gov't appointed and controlled. Will be called "Royal Canadian Wheat Board" and it's counter part "Royal Canadian Grain Commission". LOL.

        Comment


          #5
          Makes the military nuts feel better when thinking
          about the fact we got our ass's kicked in
          afgan****istan for the past decade.

          Comment


            #6
            I agree with Jack Granatstein...Harper IS an idiot trying to ingratiate himself with the upper class and definitely trying to turn the clock back.

            The sooner he goes the better for Canada.

            Comment


              #7
              By George (King George the Vth)... I think you have got it!

              RCWB,
              RCCC,
              RCMP!

              Why didn't the Liberanos remove the Royal from the Canadian Mounted Police... in 68?

              "When MacKay made his remarks Tuesday, he noted that it was exactly 100 years ago, Aug.16, 1911, that King George V established the Royal Canadian Navy."

              AND then CBC said:

              "..."We're not fighting the First World War over again, we're not fighting the Second World War over again," he said. "Those days are past, they're part of our history."

              OH YAH!!!

              This Hellyer guy should have been in Camrose at the CWB Meeting on August 16th!!!

              It is/was truly The Second World War being fought... STILL... on the home front... in all of its raging glory!!!


              Background:
              http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2011/08/16/pol-military-renaming.html

              Defence Minister Peter MacKay said Tuesday his government has corrected a historic mistake by restoring the "royal" designation to the air force and navy, a move he says will come at a minimal cost.

              At an event in Halifax, MacKay announced the Maritime Command and Air Command will again be known as the Royal Canadian Navy and Royal Canadian Air Force — names that haven't been used in more than four decades. The army, formally known as the Land Force Command, will be renamed the Canadian Army.

              The royal designation was removed from the navy and air force in 1968 when the branches were renamed and brought under one central command named the Canadian Forces.

              "Our Conservative government believes that an important element of the Canadian military heritage was lost when these three former services were required to relinquish their historic titles," MacKay said. "Today, I am honoured to announce that the three elements of the Canadian Forces will have their historic names restored."

              Veterans, military officials and other invited guests in the audience applauded when MacKay made the announcement. The defence minister said restoring the former names of the army, navy and air force is a way of connecting today's Canadian Forces members with a proud history.

              He also explained the government's decision by saying it aligns Canada with other key Commonwealth countries whose militaries use the royal designation.

              "This change is long overdue," MacKay said, adding that it's "important to correct historic mistakes" when possible.

              Former defence minister Paul Hellyer, however, the man responsible for removing "royal" from the air force and navy titles and introducing the unified command structure in 1968, said that MacKay is the one making a mistake.

              "I'm very disappointed, actually very sad … I think it's really moving backward," Hellyer told CBC News, adding that the name changes are returning Canada — and the Forces — to a "semi-colonial status."


              P.O.V.:
              Do you like the name change for the Canadian Forces?
              Hellyer, who served in the cabinets of Louis St. Laurent, Lester B. Pearson and Pierre Trudeau, said there is a determined group of veterans who liked the way things were before and pressured the Conservatives to put "royal" back in the air force and navy.

              MacKay sounds like "a lot of senior military officers who are always fighting the last war," Hellyer said.

              "We're not fighting the First World War over again, we're not fighting the Second World War over again," he said. "Those days are past, they're part of our history. … Today is different, and we have to think ahead … we've got to have an organization which is really in tune with the times, which eliminates a lot of the nonsense that happened back in those days."

              The former defence minister said the changes in 1968 saved money, but more importantly, meant the Canadian Forces were more organized and able to respond quickly when needed.

              Pre-1968, the army, navy, and air force operated in their own silos and engaged each other in turf wars and battles for resources, according to Hellyer, who said he's worried that will happen once again.

              The changes announced by the federal government Tuesday do not affect the unified command structure of the Canadian Forces introduced in 1968, which remains intact.

              When MacKay made his remarks Tuesday, he noted that it was exactly 100 years ago, Aug.16, 1911, that King George V established the Royal Canadian Navy. He thanked the veterans groups who spearheaded the campaign to restore the previous names and said there was a groundswell of support from Canadians who felt it was the right thing to do and he embraced that sentiment.

              Jerry Sigrist, executive secretary of the Royal Canadian Naval Association, said the navy now has its rightful name back.

              "Canadian naval veterans have waited many years for this," he said following MacKay's speech.

              The Naval Officers Association of Canada also issued a statement saying there had been "considerable debate" about the impending announcement and that a firm decision by the government is "warmly welcomed."

              CBC News contacted Buckingham Palace and was told the Queen is aware of the royal name change.

              The Royal Canadian Legion said the name changes are an "emotional issue" for veterans.

              "The Royal Canadian Legion is pleased that the government is recognizing long-standing traditions that have served us well during our military history," a statement said.

              The group's president, Patricia Varga, said the legion's only concern is that costs associated with the changes might eat up budgets for operations and services for members of the military. She said she has been assured that won't happen.

              Costs to change names 'minimal'

              MacKay said the name changes will have "zero impact" on operational capabilities and have "minimal cost implications."

              The defence minister said the name changes will be phased in over a period of time. Asked to put a price tag on the decision, MacKay said it was "priceless," and when pushed, he again said the costs will be minimal.

              He then said the costs can't be calculated up front because the addition of "royal" to various uniforms, equipment, letterhead, flags and other items won't be done all at once.
              The old flag of the Royal Canadian Air Force is pictured at a ceremony marking the anniversary of the Battle of Britain. On Tuesday, Defence Minister Peter MacKay announced the Air Command would once again be called the Royal Canadian Air Force.(Pawel Dwulit/Canadian Press)
              He also rejected the criticism that the government's decision signals closer ties with the British monarchy and diminishes Canada's sovereignty. MacKay said Canada's ties to the Crown "are very real," particularly when it comes to the Canadian Forces, and that those links have "no impact whatsoever" on operational matters and sovereign decisions.

              "I believe that this is consistent, I believe that this is about continuity, it's about respect for our past," he said, "And I believe that this is something that the majority of Canadians will embrace."

              MacKay said it doesn't diminish Canada's independence or contributions on the world stage.

              He also noted that this summer's visit to Canada by Prince William and his wife Kate helped reinvigorate Canadians' sense of history and connectivity to Britain.

              Renaming has its critics

              The NDP's defence critic Jack Harris criticized the government's decision to return the "royal" designation to the air force and navy.

              “It’s fine to recognize that the Maritime Command is actually the Canadian Navy, or our Air Command is actually the Canadian Air Force — but Conservatives didn’t have to do this in a divisive way. Rebranding should not be a priority for the government and adding 'Royal' will prove divisive among Canadians, which is regrettable," he said on Tuesday.

              “The government should be focused on bringing Canadians together — but with these Conservatives, the priority is to divide Canadians and turn back the clock,” he added.

              The Bloc Québécois also criticized the Conservatives over the name change, saying there wasn't a large public appetite for the decision and that it was instead ideologically motivated and designed to appeal to monarchists in the Conservative base. A statement from the party also questioned the priorities of Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government.

              A Toronto-based group called Citizens for a Canadian Republic also slammed the Conservatives for the name change, calling it "backward," and doubted MacKay's statement that it will mean minimal costs to taxpayers.

              "This isn't the 1950s, nor do we have 1950s values," spokesman Tom Freda said. "Canada has been accustomed to moving away from colonialist symbols, not toward them. I can't imagine the mainstream public in 2011 seeing this decision as positive."

              You have just got to LOVE this Country!

              Colour and Character!

              God bless Canada!

              Comment


                #8
                What we really need is sharks with laser beams
                on their heads.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Just fluff to deflect criticism of bad policy. Being fiscally responsible, what will it cost to re brand our forces with new Chinese made uniforms?

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Rule of law, democracy, equality of persons, human rights, accessible public education, innocent until proven guilty, are all characteristics that arose from the UK worldview. While I'm not British, those are the characteristics that attracted my ancestors to come to this great country, and I see no reason not to celebrate that tradition and heritage. It certainly is better than the alternative put forth by Liberals.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I should also add Supremacy of God to that list.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...