Maybe listen to the Aussies

[TOM4CWB]

wakopa,

I would like just ONE 'single desk' monopoly supporter show me... anywhere in the CWB Act or regulations... where it actually states the CWB Corporation is responsible to maximise 'designated area' grain growers returns for the Board grains it markets.

Goodale intentionally left this obligation for a sucessful grain marketing corporation OUT. IT does not exist.

SO just as the CWB structure itself creates and the services that are flowing out of that structure... the CWB discounts to the premium prices other private grain marketers obtain.

Cargill, Viterra, Richardsons... none of the independants... have any interest in undercutting each other in the broader market globally... and loosing money and competitive market share.

The CWB theory about the 'single desk' buying monopoly... is a goofy idea that can not be possible... simply because the CWB does not have enough market share in the wheat of barley market... to stop subsitution for other origin grain.

Mustard... WHO do you work for?

[Raven]

Tom, read the act as you copied it. It says: inside and outside CANADA. It does not say: inside and outside the designated area. Also, this is not Goodale legislation. It was made in 1947 and is essentially unchanged.

[TOM4CWB]

Raven,

I believe Goodale had an obligation to fix the section 46 problem... he did not... he is responsible.

Instead he made 47.1 and Director Elections that fail to recognise property rights of commercial grain growers that are most affected by the Goodale CWB ammendments.