• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Regulation, Procedures, and Rules for Triffid

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Charlie,

    All the RR Wheat grown out at Indian Head... I understand they had RR Superb at field scale.

    Comment


      #72
      There was also supposedly a rr wheat field in an irrigation district near lake diefenbaker.

      If they are going to multiple something, they are not going to do it on dryland. Food for thought, folks.

      And if they were testing wheat for the rr gene out of canada they would have found it already. Its being done no doubt.

      Comment


        #73
        So is it possible that since triffid is in 35 countries, at the CDC, and has been floating around for at least a decade in Canada there is no Canadian Organic Flax?

        For illustration 1 ppt is approximately 1 canola seed in 100 B trains. And even that is a long way from zero as per organic specification.

        Comment


          #74
          "So is it possible"

          Of course.
          Anything is possible.

          It is also possible that a stealth terminator gene hiding in xp45-flax, created in some obscure lab in the China Instiute at the U of Alberta, :<) , and multiplied on wd's farm, is slowly killing its' way over the Prairies, and wd is the only one with a patented flaxseed which he will release in 2012.

          Testing is important.

          German tests and USA tests done on Canadian organic flax, that I have heard about directly, so far, have come back negative.

          I have not spoken directly to anyone tested in Saskatchewan.

          Germany in particular, are viewed as good at what they do, by organics, and are very aggressive about testing when shipments arrive and also after the product is manufactured.

          Sophisticated equipment they use, identifies the presence of chemical resulting from spray drift: identifies the presence of Events in all grain; is able to identify which Canadian canola Events are present in mustard in the mayonnaise slathered on meatballs, as a result of pollen drift transferred from canola to mustard plants in the farmer's field.

          They are able to identify which Industrial Flax Events from Saskatchewan farmers and shipped by Viterra to a German manufacturer are present in jumping horses' rations in Frankfurt.

          Linseed grown for linoleum will be eaten in flax bread in Winnipeg tommorow morning.

          Is traceability possible? Yes.

          How is it working for Canada's food Inspectors? Good

          How is it working for Canada's food eaters? Bad

          Testing has become a game of hiding, doctoring, delaying, chasing cars, confusion and playing word games, and calculated deception.

          I have no time for it, wd.

          I press the issue of compensation for destroying organic sales....not because I eye up money, but rather because when compensation is put on the table, when responsibility is put on the table, all of a sudden players pay attention, saying, "What, me pay?"

          Innovation holds promise. "Moving forward", as charliep says and says, lol, is inevitable.

          But food is too important to NOT view the ramifications of modifying basic food.. what it hopefully can be OR might unfortunately become:
          guesswork,
          excitement,
          irreversible,
          unaccountable,
          potential,
          harmful,
          healthy
          unhealthier
          moneymaker
          national financial disaster
          responsible
          irresponsible
          life enhanicng
          life destroying
          and so on

          Farmers are front line. We know what risk is. We have the biggest stake of all.

          Every breeder growing modified plots should be listed on a website. Neighboring farmers are their allies, NOT their enemies. We are valuable for watching for traits, weeds, crosses and so on.

          One of the most important aspects of science is to acknowledge it is risk and treat it like risk.

          As an organic grower in wd's world-lab, I am your backup point. Backup farm, so to speak, just as are seed stock rooms storing original seed in many countries. A farmer's point of reference.

          Cell stems.

          Backup has an important function in the world of flax; in the world of all crops, doesn't it. Hope we are NOT contaminated and won't be.

          Testing is only as good as the rules and ethics that govern it.
          Pars

          Comment


            #75
            Just curious in your world how you deal with mother nature based
            mutationns - example might be a mycotoxin/mold that becomes more
            virulent and poses a human health concern/market access issue.

            Comment


              #76
              The world is old like me and slow like me. LOL Mother Nature is a she.LOL

              There are indeed, mutations.

              There also seems to be a natural order of things where a mere mutant castor bean plant does not cross pollinate an entire 1500 acre crop of tobacco in one summer. An albino may cause significant change in a family in one generation, but not significant change in a country.

              Mutation seems to works its' way slowly into its species and into its' environment, as a carfully as does a cat settling into a stall on a 40 below night between cows and horses.

              Very different approach from man's impatient reaction after he feeds 700 heifer calves growth hormones, watches them bred, surprisngly, at four months, curses some for dying when birthing,, and then demands if the vet could invent medication for the few survivors because they aren't 'taking their calves' like they should.

              Your world is in such a hurry, charliep, Pars

              Comment


                #77
                Pars You don't have to convince me that those responsible for harm should be accountable. You do write well enough and have more than enough smarts to simply say that organic flax (like any other commercial flax) has been compromized by a widespead low level contamination of a Triffid gene. There is no way to currently test for levels of 0%; all the way up to and even beyond 0.01% (100% of the time). When your customers are expecting zero percent and you knowingly and deliberately lead them to believe it is Triffid-free; you are deliberately deceiving customers. I do not expect arguments on that point from someone who has been as clear as you have on the importance of 100% pure foods.
                Unfortunately your goal can never be achieved. We are all going to have to put up with a little bit of everything in anything. We may work hard to reduce those levels; but you should know they can never be eliminated.
                If there is no agreement on such points; then it is a lost cause repeating basic principles which should be accepted as common ground. Surely we may spend our time debating issues which have debatable points.

                Comment


                  #78
                  oneoff,

                  canola:
                  GM events present from cross-pollination from all neighbors, if I tried to grow a canola crop in 2011, would result in prob a 90% presence. LOL

                  Flax:
                  But I have to say, that there is still organic flax that shows a 0% level. Next year less, and 5 years from now...it's deja-vous canola again.

                  Not being devious. Just have a different view. Pars

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Pars You are starting to miss points. What good is traceability if you can't possibly possibily guarantee it's purity. I want proof before I pay organic premiums or any other premium for something no better than conventional food. Just being a good salesperson just doesn't cut it. Show mw your zero percent test; and I'm no where convinced that even a negative test for 0.001% Triffid is any better than a current test at 0.01%
                    You have been quite adament that you won't stand for anything poorer than 100% pure food. When organic farmers have consistently used the same seed supplies as their conventional counterparts; and there has been proof that contamination is widespead; and at very low levels and most certainly at currently non detectable levels in flax that has been shipped to all corners of the world; and even in seedstocks at universities; pedigreed and registered growers; then it must be admitted is/could be basically everywhere and possibly anywhere; never to to separated again.
                    You might as well eat my flax Pars; because yours has every bit the same chance of containing some Triffid as mine does.
                    Or stick to potatoes. What did you think of my potato explanation? That is where we could possibly agree. Would you like to agree on potatoes?

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Charlie asks a lot of questions. He also carefully couches himself; and seldom takes a stand on any issue. Any reply just brings up more questions; as his peers continue to unilaterally make the changes that are sold/forced upon producers.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...