• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

checkoffs opt out question?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Link seems to have mysteriously become dysfunctional for me, so I am taking the liberty of posting the article, checking:



    Farmer funding fuels next generation of extra strong durum
    Date posted: May 10, 2002
    A new wheat variety, AC Navigator, is living up to its name by charting a path for Canada’s new “extra strong” durum effort. And western farmers are supporting the development of a second wave of similar varieties that promise further advances in both the market and the field.

    The most promising of this new material has entered the first year of regional co-op testing – the three year evaluation stage that precludes registration, says Dr. John Clarke, durum breeder at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Swift Current. This ongoing development is funded in part by the Saskatchewan Wheat Pool and by farmers through the Wheat and Barley Check-off Fund, administered by Western Grains Research Foundation.

    “With the material we have starting to flow into the co-op now, we’re beginning to see the fruits of the investment from the check-off and other sources,” says Clarke, who developed AC Navigator and has led the overall breeding effort. “With this support, we’ve been able to expand our effort on both the market quality front and the production front, to improve the genetics of the material.”

    AC Navigator and its potential successors represent a new type of extra strong Canadian durum with increased gluten strength – over three times higher than conventional durum. Crop development and marketing representatives are pursuing this type to help Canada compete in premium pasta markets such as Italy, which are using high gluten strength varieties for blending with domestic and European varieties.

    Traditionally, the Italians have favored desert durums out of the American southwest, which provide significantly higher gluten content than conventional Canadian varieties such as AC Kyle. The Australians have gained ground in recent years with their own new style of extra strong durums, relegating Canada to third in the small but influential Italian market.

    After two years of extensive market development, AC Navigator – owned by and developed with support from Saskatchewan Wheat Pool – is drawing positive reviews from Italian processors. But for the next generation, a further boost in gluten content, along with a moderate protein increase, is needed to keep pace with the competition.

    “On average, AC Navigator appears not to be as strong as the newer desert durums, so we’d like to increase our strength even more,” says Clarke. “The material we have in the pipeline certainly looks stronger, and the best of that is now hitting the regional co-op tests, so we’ll have a better idea of the strength characteristics after this year’s testing.”

    The protein requirements for premium pasta have made extra strong durum a safer bet for irrigated production. Clarke is aiming to keep the semi-dwarf characteristic of AC Navigator for this type of production, while continuing to improve protein potential. “We’re making some good progress with protein,” he says. “The target is to get everything up near the level of AC Avonlea, which is the new benchmark.”

    In the field, a more solid disease package, particularly for the eastern Prairie is needed to make the new durum an option for more farmers. “It’ll take a few cycles of improvement to get the disease package in there, but the material we have coming through now looks very good,” he says. “We’re essentially in the second generation of improvements.”

    With long-term support from the Check-off Fund and other funding sources, Canadian farmers can expect steady improvements over the next decade, he says. “The market will determine how we divide our effort between this strong type and the conventional type, but right now we’ve built a fair effort – at least a quarter of our material would be in the extra strong category.”

    The Wheat and Barley Check-off Fund supports wheat and barley breeding programs in Western Canada. Western Grains Research Foundation is funded and directed by farmers.

    Comment


      #72
      Go to:

      http://www.westerngrains.com/index.asp?id=13201&gfx=&ts=0

      Take a look and see where your wheat and barley checkoff dollars were spent frpm '99-2003.

      Lotta cash deducted. As a wheat and barley farmer, which project has personally helped your bottom line?

      Comment


        #73
        You can get a full list of varieties off the WGRF web site.

        [URL="http://www.westerngrains.com/index.asp?id=12101&gfx=&ts=0"]WGRF Varieties[/URL]

        Comment


          #74
          Checking
          Good link!! This is a different story that I was told, I'll look into it.

          Parsley Nice to see you think I am so "well" instructed I came up with this on my own I guess it's intuitive?
          As far as not wanting to talk with checking it was after the comment

          checking posted May 1, 2010 12:20
          Ofcourse, you have to die first for it to come into effect. Perhaps WGRF can do some research to speed that part up!!

          If someone wishes you DEAD after a talk about ag policy don't be surprised if you get treated like a dickhead.

          That's actually what prompted the real name comment. I found when I was using a pseudonym that sometimes I posted hastily. Now when I attach my name I find that I'm more careful with my words?
          Parsley open up your blog again and people can see who really are maybe you'll moderate yourself as well.

          Comment


            #75
            gusty,

            Again, you chose to not defend your monopoly check-off position, nor soundly refute my REASONS for not supporting a checkoff monoploy. LOL

            Meet the issue. Defend your stance.

            It's nothing personal for me gusty. I actually publically supported you when you ran for Wheat Board elections on my blog.

            I am also well aware of how boards and commissions sometimes develop a herd mentality,(not wanting to cause angst). And sometimes, directors, btw I'm not saying you are at all, have been brought along a trail, following unconsciously, like cows in a pasture. (That should bring AV outrage) LOL

            This is an issue. We differ.

            On the CWB issue, at least at one time you did not support a monopoly stance (for that common good). Yet you do on grain checkoffs. What has changed?

            Your reasoning is incongruent. Pars

            Comment


              #76
              Will leave the question of compulsory versus voluntary alone except to note Alberta commissions have refundable checkoffs.

              Just curious as to why anyone thinks that Canadian plant breeders spend a lot of time/money on biotech and herbicide tolerant GMO traits. What I know (at least on the public side) is that 99.99 % of breeding in western Canada is conventional (perhaps aided by marker assisted gene selection). When I look at the B of D, I see a lot who would have concerns about customer acceptance of GE (would be an interesting discussion when a project like this comes forward). Finally, the amount of money WGRF has would even start a venture into a GE project - $60 to $100 million to develop a trait and a further $20 to $40 million to get through regulatory approval. With the system in Canada, private sector wouldn't waste their money trying to get something registered here.

              Comment


                #77
                Will note the above refers to cereals. The answer would be different on canola.

                Comment


                  #78
                  Did I wish you dead, gustgd? I don't believe so. Reread.

                  I wasn't dicking around, gustgd. If you own producing mineral rights, and did not do estate planning for them prior to them being produced, on your demise the government will establish a productive life value for them. The upfront taxes assessed to your estate, in some cases, can easily be more than the total available funds that you would bequeath to your heirs.

                  Can checkoffs kill a farm business where every dollar is important?

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Maybe we should take away the funding from universities so they no longer have the ability for freedom of discovery.

                    Oh ya, we did that already....

                    Everybody fights for funding of the big companies in their own buildings on a few isolated ideas that potentially have economic return.

                    What a loss for our society.

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Parsley, What's the difference between my trial proposal of a checkoff as it exists now, with a public opt out. and your compromise on the CWB.
                      I'll paraphrase as I understand the "No cost export license"

                      The CWB can exist as is except no cost opt out licences are granted.

                      If you want we can make the list public so that all who think the CWB does a piss poor job can let the world know where they stand?

                      Does it make it less palatable if it's a negative option? Someone is in the monopoly unless you send your letter in.

                      Charlie you talk about a refundable checkoff. In your opinion is that acceptable to most producers, vs the WGRF opt out.

                      In my opinion the opt out is better because the farmer always have their money.

                      DMLfarmer You asked the good question's.
                      "Third, you are freely giving people who disagree with an organization's policy or practices a soapbox on which to preach the negatives of the organization. Every time the list is published naysayers of an organization will be clearly identified for access by media etc."
                      end quote

                      I am all for giving naysayers a soapbox. Some of them might have valid well reasoned points, and us directors might get out of the group think and learn something?? If they are ridiculous whining shit disterbers, let their own words hang them.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...