What You Can Pay For A Cow

[riders2010]

My annoyance as i listed was not with your figures or having a starting point of plan in fact you must, but more to the point that bankers, govs, policy makers etc. more often than not believe those papers are the gospel truth without considering the x factors (weather etc.) so to speak which some years carry little weight and some years make the paper worthless.

It's kinda like sitting in front of the banker and he asks okey what is your projection for canola revenue. The answer is well I have grown 40 bushels an acre, 30 bushels an acre 20 bushels an acre and 0 bushels per acre, so which one should I pick? because my revenue will be anywhere from 0 to 450 bucks an acre. lol

[riders2010]

I forgot that it is a must to do because obviously if you do the math and the facts without the x factors tell you it won't work than likely the x factors aren't gonna make it better, unless of course the x factor is that you may wein a 1200 lb stear in the fall lol

[perfecho]

Go by your gut.......if you want to be in the game you pay the price.....unsure, sit on the sidelines.
But if the banker has to be on your team, it’s a different game.
During BSE and drought, it was amazing how people adapted.
How cheap they could feed if they had to and direct market if they had to. Sometime it’s not how it works on paper, it’s how much drive you have to make it work!

[farmers_son]

Obviously I am not going out and paying $5500 or more for a cow. But as far as an operation that sees it has the ability to add 5, 10, 15 more cows it sure looks like a money maker to me.

And I really enjoyed seeing the numbers people used.

I am a bit of a pencil pusher and keep trying to figure out how to make a little more money. Years ago I put together some numbers, and although the purpose of the spreadsheet was something else, the numbers showed me the most efficient herd size was in multiples of around 33 cows because that worked out best for bulls and bales. Of course AIing and putting out the exact amount of feed would get around that but that is not the way I was doing things. Maybe I should do things differently.

We have had several good grass years and I simply have not had enough mouths out in the pasture to eat the grass that was there. I know a drought will come along and help me out with that problem. But if I have grass that otherwise is not being used should I calculate a grass component or cost to a potential cow or grasser purchase? I see quite a bit of grass in the country side. There is a lot of potential money to made getting a few extra cows out there. We really should be expanding the herd. No reason not to.

It sure is fun to have profitable numbers to work with.

[burnt]

Don't get me wrong - I am completely in favor of knowing your costs. And a lot of farmers/ranchers don't. I have people telling me that they can raise a calf for "x" amount of dollars, far, far less than I figure.

Since I don't like to call them a liar, I start asking them questions - how much did you figure in for salt, mineral, fencing or waterline supplies, etc. How much is your mortgage, taxes per A.U.? Over how many years did you figure your grass seed costs?

They usually haven't figured in the smaller costs, not to mention the big ones! And you wonder who dumps some straggly mongrel into the sales ring thinking they are making money at $550 a head?

Perfecho, you nailed the biggest factor in the success of failure of an operation.

[ALLFARMER]

Ya Perfecho you nailed it!

[farmers_son]

I am wondering if I had said all you could pay for a cow was $850 if that would have been more acceptable. There seems to be some reluctance to adjust to the new reality. That new reality is cows are profitable.

We have entered a new paradigm and cattle pricing is not going to go back to where it was. Which probably means the old ways of looking at purchasing a cow no longer applies, if it ever did.

I was told that a third generation herd of Hereford cows was dispersed last week with younger cows bringing $1900. And I think it will go higher and apparently the people paying $1900 have faith in the market too.

The reality is what you can pay for a cow depends upon your situation.

High income tax...you can buy cows and pay more for them.

Grass to spare...you have a competitive advantage when it comes to buying cows.

Already have a herd and are just looking to add some cows...you can pay more for a cow than the guy who has nothing and needs to rent pasture and buy hay.

There is an opportunity out there to buy bred females. And the opportunity is greater now then it was a couple of years ago because calf prices are so strong. Plus when spring comes you can insure against calf prices falling (CPIP) which you could not do a couple of years back.

I think the cattle industry is being hampered by extremely conservative and incorrect costing. It is crucial to understand the concepts of sunk costs, relevant costs, mutually exclusive costs, variable and fixed costs. It is crucial to get your costing right.

If you have 200 cows and add one cow do your fuel costs go up? What about fencing costs? Trucking? I doubt those costs would change one little bit, they are not relevant costs in the decision to purchase that cow. Yes if you were to double your herd size some of those costs might increase in which case they are relevant.

The only fly in the ointment is the decision to leave land in grass or break grass and rent the land for grain or grain farm yourself. But that decision is hugely dependent upon the carrying capacity of the grass. The decision is not sensitive to the price of cows because at the present calf prices you can easily justify the cow purchase as long as you are not throwing in a lot of irrelevant costs to the decision mix.

Believe it or not, you use one set of costs to determine your present cost of production but you would use a different set of costs in determining whether or not to buy a few more cows. A lot of your current fixed and even variable costs are not relevant to the decision to buy a few extra cows because few of those costs would change if you added a few more females to the herd.

[farmers_son]

I reread the previous posts. Some comments...

You have no way of knowing if the guy selling a calf in the ring for $550 is making money or not. There are operations out there that would be profitable at even lower calf prices.

Drive is not the biggest factor in an operation. Drive and determination can drive an operation right into the ground if they are determined to do the wrong thing. I have seen that happen. You need to be doing the right things right. And you will not know if you are doing the right things right if you do not know your costs and do not know how to cost the decisions you are making or should be making.

[ASRG]

farmers son: I can see an opportunity. Unfortunately........I have this partner (a son) who sees this as a short term ``blip`` and to hell with that!...and at the end of the day someone has to do the work......and I am tired.
I suspect that is the situation on a lot of farms. Thes young guys aren`t going to take a risk and roll the dice......and quite frankly I can`t blame them......after our government shafted us.

[grassfarmer]

"Thes young guys aren`t going to take a risk and roll the dice"

There is always risk in any business and in agriculture. For those adverse to risk go work in the oil patch. You still have risk though - you might lose your job tomorrow, or get injured.