• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dual desk is code for disaster

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Dual desk is code for disaster

    this document web posted: 2006-02-09
    Western Producer
    By Wendy Holm

    "
    ALTHOUGH a vocal minority will no doubt portray it as such, it would be a mistake to interpret Stephen Harper's minority victory as a vote against the Canadian Wheat Board.

    The spin doctors will, of course, tell you different. But on this point farmers should be perfectly clear: abandonment of Western Canada's single desk system for the sale of export wheat and barley - a system supported by the majority of western farmers - would turn the clock back 100 years, spelling disaster for the economics of prairie communities.

    Back in the 1920s, before the CWB was created, Canada's farmers were at the mercy of brokers who drove grain prices down in the fall, when farmers needed cash to pay bills, and up in the spring, when granaries were empty and farmers were studying cropping options to cover last year's losses.

    By manipulating price cycles, brokers were able to transfer profits from the pockets of farmers to the boards of the Winnipeg exchange, putting smiles on the faces of commodity investors and pushing rural communities to the brink of bankruptcy.

    In response, farmers set up co-operatives. United Grain Growers and the wheat pools of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba allowed farmers to balance supply and demand, pool economic returns and ensure price equity for all producers.

    The single desk selling authority of the Canadian Wheat Board, created under William Lyon MacKenzie King, gave farmers the market leverage to ensure fair prices to producers. The Crow Rate, initially intended to capture back for farming a small portion of the land benefits received by Canada's railways, ensured grain could be economically shipped to ports for export. The system worked well for nearly 60 years.

    Then, in the 1980s, things began to change.

    First to go was the Crow Rate. Transportation rates that averaged 14 cents a bushel are closer to $2 a bushel today. Then came deregulation of Canada's railways, resulting in the abandonment of rail service to hundreds of small prairie communities. Subsequent consolidation by the grain companies closed small, local elevators with three to eight car spots in favour of those with 50 to 100 car spots, shutting down more than 50 percent of prairie grain holding capacity.

    As hauling distances increased, larger trucks were needed. In Saskatchewan, for example, roads rated for 22 tonnes now regularly service trucks hauling 64 tonnes and more, with the taxpayer picking up the tab for wear and tear.

    Despite these structural changes, independent studies dating back to 1997 by noted agricultural economists Richard Grey, Daryl Kraft, Hartley Furtan and Andy Schmitz continue to demonstrate the success of the Canadian Wheat Board. Farmers received a greater return per tonne marketing through the CWB than they could have realized through any other system.

    Yet today, long on rhetoric and short on history, Harper insists it's time for a change.

    Make no mistake: dual desk selling for export wheat and barley is simply code for breaking the pricing authority of the CWB. And the only ones who will benefit are the multinationals.

    In concentrated sectors like the grain industry, a handful of powerful players dominate the market. With the ability to manipulate prices to serve their own economic interests, why should agri-food giants like Cargill, Archer Daniels Midland, ConAgra, Louis Dreyfus and others compete in the prices they pay for export wheat and barley? It's far easier to drive down the farm price and put those profits to work competing for shareholder capital.

    This is simply how oligopolies (few sellers) and oligopsonies (few buyers) work. Market dominance allows them to buy low and sell high and industry capital costs prevent would-be competitors from entering the market.

    Faced with concentrated markets pre and post farmgate, farmers are vulnerable. Globalization and trade deregulation exacerbates the problem, allowing multinationals to source cheap products from third world countries and pass otherwise prohibitive transaction costs, such as transportation, on to the buyer.

    This has the effect of driving down prices paid to producers and inflating the price of feed grains.

    A two-desk system for export wheat would destroy the CWB because short-term predatory pricing by concentrated grain buyers would bid grain away from the wheat board, breaking the back of the system.

    Without the central desk selling authority of the CWB, farmers to the north, facing higher transportation costs, will be pitted against farmers to the south. Livestock producers will see prices escalate for coarse feed grains. Concentrated economic players will have their hands in the pockets of farmers across Western Canada and farm communities will falter.

    Welcome to the 1920s. We've been here before. Those who fail to understand the lessons of history are bound to repeat them. Without political leaders prepared to listen to, understand and defend the economic and trade interests of Canada's farmers, we are all sitting ducks.

    In Canada, elections are lost, not won. On Jan. 23, Canadians who had lost faith in the ability of the Liberals to govern presented the Conservatives a minority shot at doing it better.

    Harper's win had nothing to do with his unenlightened stand on wheat board, and it will be up to farm organizations and politicians of all stripes to defend the interests of prairie farmers should he make any moves in this direction.

    Dual desk selling is code for destroying the market power of Canadian grain farmers and with it the economic future of Western Canada's farm communities. If we don't stand for something, we'll fall for anything. Think about it."

    #2
    WENDY HOLM, P.AG., is a Bowen Island, B.C. based Agrologist, resource economist, columnist and author. A recognized international expert on the water/trade issue, Holm the editor/contributing author of the 1988 book "WATER AND FREE TRADE" (Lormier, Toronto) and co-author of "NAFTA and Water Exports" (Canadian Environmental Law Association, 1993). Holm was past president of the BC Institute of Agrologists, past BC Director of the Agriculture Institute of Canada, past Director of Vancouver City Savings Credit Union and past Chair of the Board of Trustees, Ethical Funds Inc. In May 1993, Holm was awarded the Queen's Commemorative Medal honouring the 125th Anniversary of Canadian Confederation by the Governor General of Canada for her "contribution to community". In 1992, Holm received the B.C. Government Award for Excellence in Community Programming and in 2002 received the Queen's Jubilee Medal. For the past four years, Wendy Holm has led the Canada Cuba Farmer to Farmer Project to develop cooperative bridges in support of sustainability. In April 2001, Holm was named AGROLOGIST OF THE YEAR 2000 by the BC Institute of Agrologists for her work on water resources and the Canada-Cuba project.
    _______________________________________

    Comment


      #3
      "unenlightened stand" ???

      No bias here, move along, nothing to see.

      Someone tell me the difference between the price being driven down in the fall by the grain companies in the past, and the inability to move any grain into a congested stagnant grain system and hoping for a huge initial payment now?

      Comment


        #4
        Incognito;

        It is actually VERY positive that this "Expert" on growing wheat and marketing it has poked her head out of the B.C. forest and told us how to manage our farms on the Prairie!

        Proves one point though!

        That all Canadians have a right to be heard on this point... even if they are not directly involved in growing wheat and barley!

        God Bless Her!

        She just proved her point to me... that her basic theology is flawed... on who SHOULD make the decision on the "single desk"!

        All Canadians are affected... not just grain growers!

        Comment


          #5
          Silverback;

          I just bought a Golf TDI off ebay.

          Cut all the middle car dealers out... and take the risk myself on the vehicle.

          About a 30% discount.

          1 Million vehicles sold through EBAY.

          If CWB theology were to hold true... all local vehicle dealerships would have been bankrupt 5 years ago... as soon as ebay started selling vehicles!

          I say the cup is half full; and I believe we can do even better!

          Comment


            #6
            Isn’t it a crying shame that you don’t have to really understand something before you get to publicly embarrass yourself? I don’t think I have ever seen as many factual mistakes in a single public document.

            Comment


              #7
              Tom,

              I am assuming used car?

              Comment


                #8
                I agree with the comment about getting your facts straight. The author wants to deal with ideology not reality. Whether the CWB competes with the multinationals inside the country or outside doesn't change the fact that the buyer will buy as low as he can and the seller will sell as high as he can. If the ideology of the CWB works so well then in fact there would be no need to defend it.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Silverback;

                  A used diesel.

                  Get to go to Mn and pick it up!

                  $99 Air (Westjet)to Winterpeg from Edm. one way...

                  There is another industry that proves change CAN happen
                  ~

                  God Bless Canada!

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Jagfarms,

                    The earth is round!

                    What would have been the reaction?

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...
                    X

                    This website uses tracking tools, including cookies. We use these technologies for a variety of reasons, including to recognize new and past website users, to customize your experience, perform analytics and deliver personalized advertising on our sites, apps and newsletters and across the Internet based on your interests.
                    You agree to our and by clicking I agree.