|
Apr 22, 2023 | 21:39
62
 Originally Posted by TOM4CWB
Lithium batteries burn at very high temperatures…
This ship sunk, it could not be extinguished because of the EV cars…118 of 4000.
…
No one wants to talk about the elephant in the room…
Cheers
Interesting thoughts:

It is all wonderful… until…
|
|
Apr 23, 2023 | 08:10
63
So vehicles with ICE never catch fire? Only EVs? Gasoline is not flammable?
|
|
Apr 23, 2023 | 08:18
64
 Originally Posted by fjlip
"Another major issue with electric vehicles is that they’re significantly heavier than gas-powered vehicles.
“It’s a matter of physics,” said David Adams, the president of the Global Automakers of Canada. “The batteries are extremely heavy and the vehicles are extremely heavy.”
Adams explained that the larger the vehicle, the bigger and heavier the battery will have to be to power it, which makes it even more dangerous to cars on the road. He added that the tires for electric vehicles are also heavier than combustion engine vehicles because they are built to sustain the weight of the battery.
This added weight will put more strain on our roads. It also makes it much more dangerous for gas-powered vehicles when an electric vehicle and a gas-powered car collide.
In 2011, the National Bureau of Economic Research found that if a vehicle weighs 1,000 pounds more than another vehicle, it results in a 47 per cent increase in fatality risk.
Earlier this year, the National Transportation Safety Board in the U.S. raised concerns over the increasing weight of electric trucks and Hummers, saying, “We have to be careful that we aren’t also creating unintended consequences: More death on our roads…safety, especially when it comes to new transportation policies and new technologies, cannot be overlooked.”
Parkades will collapsed from heavier EV's. Bridges will be stressed. Endless bad shit!
There is some unavoidable math behind the "significantly heavier" EV's.
While the weight of an ICE vehicle is mostly cheap readily available ( and easily recyclable) products such as steel, aluminum and hydrocarbons.
Most of the additional weight that makes an EV so much heavier is comprised of copper and lithium and cobalt and a long list of other expensive difficult/expensive/dirty to obtain, refine and process, and very difficult to recycle materials.
So how will an EV ever be cost competitive with an ICE? Let alone "greener"?
Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Apr 23, 2023 at 08:29.
|
|
Apr 23, 2023 | 08:19
65
Their is risk in everything , notting wrong with wanting to know to know where risk is higher
|
|
Apr 23, 2023 | 08:25
66
The price of lithium has gone down a lot.
Lithium carbonate prices sank below CNY 180,000 per tonne in April, the lowest in 18 months and down 70% from their record high in November 2022, as abundant supply and weak demand backed expectations for a surplus this year. The Chinese government ended cash subsidies for households purchasing new energy vehicles, resulting in NEV sales growth slowing to 22% year-on-year in Q1 of 2023 compared with the 93% surge in 2022. The overproduction of batteries at the end of the last year to take advantage of subsidies also attributed to the unsustainable inventory rise and prompted the sale of goods at a steep discount, with sharp capacity cuts in all streams of the supply chain. Still, multiple carbonate producers reported a reduction in their processing rates, while the EU decided to phase out carbon-emitting cars by 2035. Expectations that stockpiles might thin and demand recover led market players to believe prices are reaching their bottom.
|
|
Apr 23, 2023 | 08:29
67
 Originally Posted by chuckChuck
The price of lithium has gone down a lot.
Lithium carbonate prices sank below CNY 180,000 per tonne in April, the lowest in 18 months and down 70% from their record high in November 2022, as abundant supply and weak demand backed expectations for a surplus this year. The Chinese government ended cash subsidies for households purchasing new energy vehicles, resulting in NEV sales growth slowing to 22% year-on-year in Q1 of 2023 compared with the 93% surge in 2022. The overproduction of batteries at the end of the last year to take advantage of subsidies also attributed to the unsustainable inventory rise and prompted the sale of goods at a steep discount, with sharp capacity cuts in all streams of the supply chain. Still, multiple carbonate producers reported a reduction in their processing rates, while the EU decided to phase out carbon-emitting cars by 2035. Expectations that stockpiles might thin and demand recover led market players to believe prices are reaching their bottom.
Along with all of the other industrial commodities which are needed to build any type of vehicle. This doesn't give any relative advantage to the EV.
|
|
Apr 23, 2023 | 08:31
68
The ownership costs of EVs will be much lower in the long run. And batteries will come down in price and be recycled.
|
|
Apr 23, 2023 | 08:39
69
 Originally Posted by chuckChuck
The ownership costs of EVs will be much lower in the long run. And batteries will come down in price and be recycled.
Now you have deflected to claiming ownership costs will be cheaper. I've already posted many links indicating that thanks, to ruining the electricity grid with renewables, charging costs are now exceeding the cost to fuel an ICE in many places. And this is before road taxes and up front recycling fees inevitably get applied to EV's.
You really don't like math do you. And why do your arguments always involve some future unknown undiscovered nonexistent technology? Our governments are now mandating the use of these vehicles, which can only be manufactured using existing technology.
The unavoidable reality as indicated above, is that an EV is much heavier than an ICE.
Unless that extra weight comes from some as yet unknown product which is cheaper than steel, aluminum and hydrocarbons, how does the EV ever become cheaper than the ICE?
|
|
Apr 23, 2023 | 08:47
70
why let the facts get in the way of a good story ? thats what happens when you have been brainwashed
|
|
Apr 23, 2023 | 09:03
71
EV vs. Gas: Which Cars Are Cheaper to Own?
We use data and simple math in an attempt to answer this very complicated question.
By Roberto Baldwin, Sasha Richie and Dave VanderWerpPublished: Oct 28, 2022
https://www.caranddriver.com/shopping-advice/a32494027/ev-vs-gas-cheaper-to-own/
Which Is Cheaper to Own?
So, by our calculations this makes the electric F-150 $2664 cheaper to own and operate over the first three years than its gas counterpart—and that’s without the tax credit. With it, it’s a substantial $10,164 less. The Kona Electric, on the other hand, is more costly than the gas version by $2041 without the tax credit, but $5459 cheaper with it. There can also be state and local incentives for EVs to factor in if those are available. Plus, as the years progress the lower costs of operating an electric vehicle (fuel and maintenance) continue to accrue.
https://www.caranddriver.com/shopping-advice/a32494027/ev-vs-gas-cheaper-to-own/
|
|
Apr 23, 2023 | 09:35
72
 Originally Posted by chuckChuck
EV vs. Gas: Which Cars Are Cheaper to Own?
We use data and simple math in an attempt to answer this very complicated question.
By Roberto Baldwin, Sasha Richie and Dave VanderWerpPublished: Oct 28, 2022
https://www.caranddriver.com/shopping-advice/a32494027/ev-vs-gas-cheaper-to-own/
Which Is Cheaper to Own?
So, by our calculations this makes the electric F-150 $2664 cheaper to own and operate over the first three years than its gas counterpart—and that’s without the tax credit. With it, it’s a substantial $10,164 less. The Kona Electric, on the other hand, is more costly than the gas version by $2041 without the tax credit, but $5459 cheaper with it. There can also be state and local incentives for EVs to factor in if those are available. Plus, as the years progress the lower costs of operating an electric vehicle (fuel and maintenance) continue to accrue.
https://www.caranddriver.com/shopping-advice/a32494027/ev-vs-gas-cheaper-to-own/
That is good news.
No more need for mandates, or subsidies. There must be savings left over for EV owners to pay their share of road taxes too, and recycling fees.
Why is Ford still projecting another 3 billion loss on their EV division this year? If your claims are correct, then that must be a mistake.
What do you suppose is the hold up?
Must be some conspiracy by the oil companies, right?
|
|
Apr 23, 2023 | 10:04
73
 Originally Posted by cropgrower
why let the facts get in the way of a good story ? thats what happens when you have been brainwashed
|
|
Apr 23, 2023 | 10:12
74
What a bunch of total BS chuck spews. Cheaper to operate. You mean after all the nations grids have been upgraded to street level to handle a 200 amp service for every home. Like plug that one into your little calculator once.
Oh and little tip, that means no buried service to your home. Imagine abandoning all that trenched in UG service to put poles back up in your front yard.
What a bunch of tards these esg fanatics are.
And theres more;

We will go broke chasing this folly.
Last edited by jazz; Apr 23, 2023 at 10:14.
|
|
Apr 23, 2023 | 10:43
76
It is a fallacy that underground electrical conductors can’t carry higher amperage loads…
The reality is… as the amperage load increases… the voltage must increase exponentially…
Practically the cost of underground electrical conductors rises exponentially…. While overhead power lines can be upgraded and voltage increased to supply the increased amperage requirements.
Further… EV charging requirements are exponentially more than an electrical range… for cooking… electric dryer or water heater.
Therefore the total amperage requirements for the transportation fleet running on electricity alone… is exponentially more expensive than hydrogen or hydrocarbon fuels.
Any elementary school students can figure this out… if they are actually provided with factual information.
CC is baiting us… in a cold Canadian weather climate… these EV costs increase to astronomical costs…
Cheers… as the Bible says over and over…. Don’t be deceived!!!!
|
|
Apr 23, 2023 | 12:34
77
Anyone know the cost of fire insurance for an EV?
|
|
Apr 23, 2023 | 14:25
78
 Originally Posted by wade
Anyone know the cost of fire insurance for an EV?
Comprehensive insurance for EVs is somewhat more expensive than ice vehicles.
I would be curious to know who covers the incidental damages from a vehicle fire. If any vehicle urns in a garage or parking garage or public place and causes other damage, I assume the insurance companies get to fight about who pays for what. Can the automotive insurance provider be responsible for the loss of a garage or house or condo unit? Do they go after the car maker themselves?
|
|
Apr 24, 2023 | 06:24
79
So ICE vehicles never catch fire? LOL
And most of your auto insurance goes for collision damage risk.
But don't let that stop you from making more feeble excuses against EVs.
|
|
Apr 24, 2023 | 07:13
80
 Originally Posted by Hamloc
Chuck2, I own the top 12 inches. The Province owns what lies beneath, they have the mineral rights, I do not. They have the right to access what they own.
They do but if you signed a surface lease 20 years ago and received a payment for permanent damage to the land, what is the value of that land and damage today? In many cases multiple times higher.
You can review the annual payment for loss of use and nuisance but you can never revise the permanent damage payment
How many of you would have been satisfied with a payment for permanent damage based on much lower land values 30 years later?
The reason it's called permanent damage is in many cases the land is permanently damaged and lost for decades.
Is the value of the production the same as 30 years ago? Nope
But whether you agree or disagree with the issues around surface leases, the surface right arbitration board will enforce access for the oil company and take the negotiation process out of the hands of the landowner if you don't agree with their plans and compensation.
So much for the concept of property rights when dealing with oil companies. Property rights are limited by government intervention and regulation in favour of the oil industry.
|
|
Apr 24, 2023 | 07:52
81
 Originally Posted by chuckChuck
They do but if you signed a surface lease 20 years ago and received a payment for permanent damage to the land, what is the value of that land and damage today? In many cases multiple times higher.
You can review the annual payment for loss of use and nuisance but you can never revise the permanent damage payment
How many of you would have been satisfied with a payment for permanent damage based on much lower land values 30 years later?
The reason it's called permanent damage is in many cases the land is permanently damaged and lost for decades.
Is the value of the production the same as 30 years ago? Nope
But whether you agree or disagree with the issues around surface leases, the surface right arbitration board will enforce access for the oil company and take the negotiation process out of the hands of the landowner if you don't agree with their plans and compensation.
So much for the concept of property rights when dealing with oil companies. Property rights are limited by government intervention and regulation in favour of the oil industry.
If you never want any wells do not allow seismic. You have that right to not allow initial access and they’ll probably not bother you. Or just act like a complete lunatic. We have guys around who never allowed any seismic and never had a well.
|
|
Apr 24, 2023 | 07:57
82
I thought this article in Reuters was interesting. American companies waiting to see if they can use foreign made solar cells to receive IRA subsidies to assemble solar panels in the U.S. At present there is no American made solar cells!!!!
|
|
Apr 25, 2023 | 04:10
83
Enviro-yahoos blocking each other is just an epic self own for the climate cult.
|
|
Apr 25, 2023 | 07:23
84
Take time to watch this, dont get rid of your ICE vehicle . This makes way more sense as it will not put a massive load on the electric grid or cost billions to invest in charging stations.
youtu.be/tfcktcL1la8
Canada just about to waste billions of tax dollars in the new VW battery plant that will be obsolete before its built
|
|
Apr 25, 2023 | 07:30
85
That's why I kept my party line and out door toilet. That new expensive tech will never work! LOL
|
|
Apr 25, 2023 | 09:37
86
So what's wrong with ZERO C02 emissions CC?
No insane batteries, insane costs to change the planet?
|
|
Apr 25, 2023 | 10:34
87
 Originally Posted by chuckChuck
That's why I kept my party line and out door toilet. That new expensive tech will never work! LOL
This is a great analogy chuck. Replacing the outhouse with indoor plumbing, and trying to compare that to electric cars.
The outhouse was 100% reliable, never plugged or flooded, no handle to jiggle, no parts to wear out, no power bill no water bill, didn't matter if the power went out, no sewers to freeze, or sump pumps to fail, cost almost nothing to build, and even less to maintain. But for some reason, virtually everyone was willing to spend large amounts of their own money to replace the outdoor out house with indoor plumbing, fraught with all of the well-known problems and ongoing expenses involved with that.
And everyone switched to indoor plumbing without any government mandates or subsidies or propaganda.
They switched to the new technology because the indoor experience was such an improvement over using an outhouse by every measure imaginable. The hassle and the risks and the cost were worth every penny.
Can any of that be said for electric cars?
|
|
Apr 25, 2023 | 19:25
89
So Chuck which EV did you end up deciding on and purchase?
|
|
Apr 28, 2023 | 06:48
90
So Quebec, the biggest producer of hydropower in Canada got to greedy and now is asking consumers to conserve electricity, go figure!!
|
|