|
Mar 22, 2023 | 06:33
1
Change is coming that hasn't happened in 100 years. And we are driving this change together.'
Ah this doesn’t sound like a good thing or are we ok in Canada because Trudeau is in bed with china?
|
|
|
Mar 22, 2023 | 08:05
3
More is being made of this than really exists. Facts are that china buys a lot of natural resources and Russia is the lowest cost source of them right now. China also makes a lot of stuff and Russia has money to buy. So yes there is much opportunity for trade. No china is not going to buy Russia as they can't afford it. Canuckistan is done so the right move is to sell assets in canuckistan and retire to Florida. The frightening decline in the canola market is a harbinger of the future. Markets are following 1982 to a T. Higher interest rates met lower grain prices that year and kicked off the 80's farm crisis. I do see the cattle industry making a bit of a come back as land values decline.
|
|
Mar 22, 2023 | 08:17
4
USD fiat central bank hegemony is being broken.
Better have some hard assets in your portfolio when it goes down.
|
|
Mar 22, 2023 | 09:25
6
|
|
Mar 22, 2023 | 10:24
7
WELL! Turdo been phucking around, getting away with countless evil crooked shit!
His graph should even bent to the left and BITE real hard!
This could apply to many countries, Covid debacle, Climate hysteria, we might see karma all unfold shortly.
|
|
|
Mar 22, 2023 | 18:19
8
 Originally Posted by SASKFARMER
Change is coming that hasn't happened in 100 years. And we are driving this change together.'
Ah this doesn’t sound like a good thing or are we ok in Canada because Trudeau is in bed with china?
Ha are you forgetting about Harpers secret deal that gave 35 year one sided agreement to Xi ??
|
|
|
Mar 22, 2023 | 18:29
9
Mustardman, what agreement is that? Elaborate, please.
Trudeau thinks he’s God’s gift to the world, omnipotent ruler and keeper of entire mankind. He, Joly, Freeland, Guillboat trot around pontificating and F…Ing around. They will find out.
Last edited by sumdumguy; Mar 22, 2023 at 18:32.
|
|
|
Mar 23, 2023 | 17:19
10
Originally Posted by sumdumguy
Mustardman, what agreement is that? Elaborate, please.
Trudeau thinks he’s God’s gift to the world, omnipotent ruler and keeper of entire mankind. He, Joly, Freeland, Guillboat trot around pontificating and F…Ing around. They will find out.
LOOKUP Fipa if you find Any good news about THAT trade agreement your a better man than most.
Harper gave the Chinese a Sweetheart deal and didnt have the guts to do it in Canada in front of parliament. He signed it in secret in Russia
Oh but we did get to house the Panda bears at one of our Zoos so I guess thats his version of a win
|
|
|
Mar 23, 2023 | 17:32
11
Originally Posted by mustardman
LOOKUP Fipa if you find Any good news about THAT trade agreement your a better man than most.
Harper gave the Chinese a Sweetheart deal and didnt have the guts to do it in Canada in front of parliament. He signed it in secret in Russia
Oh but we did get to house the Panda bears at one of our Zoos so I guess thats his version of a win
https://www.ndp.ca/news/reminder-to-liberals-remember-vote-china-canada-foreign-investment-protection-agreement
“Liberals have raised concerns about provisions of this agreement, particularly on the issues of transparency during arbitration, termination of the agreement, and the length of time the agreement is in force.” Email response on behalf of Justin Trudeau, April 25, 2013 “The Liberal Party does have serious concerns with the Canada-China FIPA.” Joyce Murray, April 25, 2013 “The Liberal Party has raised concerns about provisions in the Canada-China investment agreement” Wayne Easter, House of Commons, April 18, 2013
But don’t be fooled. When the issue of FIPA was put to a vote in the House of Commons all the Liberals present – including Justin Trudeau - voted in favour of the agreement and with Stephen Harper.
Amazing how you left wing whacks try to rewrite history.
|
|
|
Mar 23, 2023 | 17:34
12
It’s a long time ago that we had a leader for the people.
|
|
|
Mar 23, 2023 | 20:40
13
Originally Posted by LWeber
https://www.ndp.ca/news/reminder-to-liberals-remember-vote-china-canada-foreign-investment-protection-agreement
“Liberals have raised concerns about provisions of this agreement, particularly on the issues of transparency during arbitration, termination of the agreement, and the length of time the agreement is in force.” Email response on behalf of Justin Trudeau, April 25, 2013 “The Liberal Party does have serious concerns with the Canada-China FIPA.” Joyce Murray, April 25, 2013 “The Liberal Party has raised concerns about provisions in the Canada-China investment agreement” Wayne Easter, House of Commons, April 18, 2013
But don’t be fooled. When the issue of FIPA was put to a vote in the House of Commons all the Liberals present – including Justin Trudeau - voted in favour of the agreement and with Stephen Harper.
Amazing how you left wing whacks try to rewrite history.
He will hide now
|
|
|
Mar 24, 2023 | 20:17
14
Originally Posted by LWeber
https://www.ndp.ca/news/reminder-to-liberals-remember-vote-china-canada-foreign-investment-protection-agreement
“Liberals have raised concerns about provisions of this agreement, particularly on the issues of transparency during arbitration, termination of the agreement, and the length of time the agreement is in force.” Email response on behalf of Justin Trudeau, April 25, 2013 “The Liberal Party does have serious concerns with the Canada-China FIPA.” Joyce Murray, April 25, 2013 “The Liberal Party has raised concerns about provisions in the Canada-China investment agreement” Wayne Easter, House of Commons, April 18, 2013
But don’t be fooled. When the issue of FIPA was put to a vote in the House of Commons all the Liberals present – including Justin Trudeau - voted in favour of the agreement and with Stephen Harper.
Amazing how you left wing whacks try to rewrite history.
So How did I try to rewrite history? I wonder how many parliamentary minions even read the deal or just voted with the party line? I like free-trade agreements that benefit usually BOTH sides but This was not that. I guess the NDP and the Greens were the only ones who read it
|
|
