|
Mar 14, 2023 | 09:06
241
still have not decided what one is the biggest scam , C19 or climate change ?
|
|
Mar 14, 2023 | 09:26
242
 Originally Posted by cropgrower
still have not decided what one is the biggest scam , C19 or climate change ?
They could only run the covid scam for about 18 months before people woke up.
Climate scam has been running for 25 yrs. Still a lot pf people asleep, some still in outright coma like chuck.
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2023 | 09:39
243
Originally Posted by cropgrower
still have not decided what one is the biggest scam , C19 or climate change ?
With the benefit of hindsight, they are both the same scam. Both have the same end goal, both have the same players, both use the same tactics, and both are anti humanity.
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2023 | 09:46
244
Yes both all about control , and the 🐑🐑🐑🐑 follow along
|
|
|
Mar 14, 2023 | 10:15
245
California right now is the perfect example.
Every headline sounds like 1 to 4in of rain is a coming Armageddon.
"New atmospheric river slamming California with heavy rain, mountain snow"
If you read the details they had mor rain in 2019.
Next will be fires in the summer when all that lush undergrowth dries up and one of their power lines with no right of way cleared touches a tree.
Climate Change is destroying their utopian lifestyle.
|
|
Mar 18, 2023 | 19:07
247
OMFG sakes... slap this idiot, 100 times!
|
|
|
Mar 22, 2023 | 06:11
248
Finally, they are putting costs to the climate charade. Breaking ourselves trying to shave a degree off the earths temp. Total insanity.
|
|
|
Mar 22, 2023 | 06:43
249
The other side of that equation should read, “ What will trillions of waste gain us = Negative Zero”.
Joly made a fool of Canada again by snipping about a leadership change in Russia. Hmmm, even the kremlin is threatening diplomatic fall-out against the Canadian Regime. The Doomsday Cult is going to drive this great nation into the ground, maybe all the way down to China.
From National Post, you ought to read the comments. This is why Trudeau wants to stifle free press.
Last edited by sumdumguy; Mar 22, 2023 at 07:06.
|
|
|
Mar 22, 2023 | 11:24
250
There is not enough hours in a day to read all the negative TURD comments on Twitter topic/news posts.
The F A is coming to bite!
|
|
|
Mar 25, 2023 | 08:20
251
Yup this thread is appropriately called climate clown planet! LOL
|
|
|
Mar 25, 2023 | 08:37
252
Originally Posted by chuckChuck
Yup this thread is appropriately called climate clown planet! LOL
This is the best response you have when jazz posts numbers from organizations you have previously quoted as being reliable?
IRENA, the world Bank and Wall Street journal have put dollar figures on what the renewable transition will cost, so now you ignore that and come back with insults instead.
Or is IRENA, the international renewable energy agency now a denier organization because they published realistic information you don't like?
Do you find keeping your head in the sand to be an effective approach?
|
|
|
Mar 25, 2023 | 08:47
253
Yes and you forgot to mention the economic cost of human caused climate change and the risk of irreversible tipping points that make the cost of adaptation and mitigation look small in comparison.
You guys think its all a socialist plot! Just like Steve said.
Ignore the science and the cost and it will all go away! LOL
|
|
|
Mar 25, 2023 | 10:14
255
Could explain a lot about some characters
|
|
|
Mar 25, 2023 | 10:25
256
Originally Posted by fjlip
Could explain a lot about some characters
You wouldn't be suggesting that our very own climate clown isn't the first generation of his family to Believe in following the always settled science would you? It would explain a lot.
Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Mar 25, 2023 at 12:27.
|
|
|
Mar 25, 2023 | 13:52
257
Originally Posted by chuckChuck
Yes and you forgot to mention the economic cost of human caused climate change and the risk of irreversible tipping points that make the cost of adaptation and mitigation look small in comparison.
You guys think its all a socialist plot! Just like Steve said.
Ignore the science and the cost and it will all go away! LOL
Who is Steve?
Can you indicate in the historical record when these climate tipping points were reached previous times? For example when CO2 was 10 times higher than today, was the tipping point reached?
|
|
|
Mar 25, 2023 | 20:54
258
Originally Posted by biglentil
Science
Good CCF’ers of that time advocated for this plus eugenics. The technocracy movement floating around before the rise of the ccf was actually outlawed from Canada cause powers that be at the time seen it as a threat to democracy. Even if you’re a Mensa worthy mind you can actually be dangerous to your fellow man.
|
|
|
Mar 26, 2023 | 08:07
259
So you had to go back 70 years to produce evidence that the current climate science can't be "settled" or trusted? LOL Good one!
So this is evidence that we shouldn't rely on the overwhelming science of today to make informed decisions about anything? That all of climate science will someday be proven wrong!
It's not as if the capability of humans and technological advancements along with our scientific knowledge have advanced since 1950? Naw that wouldn't be the case would it?
So when you are invited to speak at a climate science climate conference or any science conference and your argument is that the psychiatric science of 70 years ago was wrong and that because of this, we know for sure that all the current science is also wrong. That's going to be your evidence? You will have them rolling in fits of laughter in the aisles!
I think the problem for some of you guys is your thinking and knowledge is from about 70 years ago and your logic is missing!
You really got to work on some better excuses.
Give the f..k up!
Last edited by chuckChuck; Mar 26, 2023 at 08:21.
|
|
|
Mar 26, 2023 | 08:35
260
Originally Posted by chuckChuck
Give the f..k up!
Oh, Chuck is swearing again. Apparently this dress of losing every debate is getting to be too
I would suggest it's time for a holiday to unwind and relax, but I think he just got back.
|
|
|
Mar 26, 2023 | 08:39
261
Originally Posted by chuckChuck
So you had to go back 70 years to produce evidence that the current climate science can't be "settled" or trusted? LOL Good one!
So this is evidence that we shouldn't rely on the overwhelming science of today to make informed decisions about anything? That all of climate science will someday be proven wrong!
It's not as if the capability of humans and technological advancements along with our scientific knowledge have advanced since 1950? Naw that wouldn't be the case would it?
So when you are invited to speak at a climate science climate conference or any science conference and your argument is that the psychiatric science of 70 years ago was wrong and that because of this, we know for sure that all the current science is also wrong. That's going to be your evidence? You will have them rolling in fits of laughter in the aisles!
I think the problem for some of you guys is your thinking and knowledge is from about 70 years ago and your logic is missing!
You really got to work on some better excuses.
Give the f..k up!
It certainly is warm in California. 
|
|
|
Mar 26, 2023 | 08:42
262
Speaking of missing logic and dumb climate change ideas! Perfect timing A5 and Hamloc.
And you have never sworn and are offended by those who do? It's a point of emphasis. Not that it will work. LOL
|
|
|
Mar 26, 2023 | 09:01
263
You still haven't answered, who is Steve?
|
|
|
Mar 26, 2023 | 09:03
264
Originally Posted by AlbertaFarmer5
You still haven't answered, who is Steve?
Steve Harper "its a socialist plot" LOL
|
|
|
Mar 26, 2023 | 09:15
265
Originally Posted by chuckChuck
Steve Harper "its a socialist plot" LOL
I see. I didn't realize you two were on a first name basis. I thought you were still upset with him about the whole CWB thing.
So why does he get to be called Steve, but every other conservative politician gets a y added to their name, Polly and Danny and Scotty etc.?
|
|
|
Mar 26, 2023 | 09:42
266
Stevey in 2015 also signed a G7 agreement to end the use of fossil fuels for energy by the year 2100.
Oh shit you forgot about that didn't you! Stevey was visionary, even if a bit slow, compared to most of the flat earthers of today. LOL He must have been party to the socialist plot!
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/canada-commits-to-ending-fossil-fuel-use-by-2100/article24844340/
Canada commits to G7 plan to end use of fossil fuels
|
|
|
Mar 26, 2023 | 09:51
267
Yup nearly 80 years from now , the only reasonable timeline ever signed on to
|
|
|
Mar 26, 2023 | 09:55
268
Now I have no idea what you were talking about. What socialist plot are you referring to? Is it recent, I haven't heard anything about this.
And, thank you for being consistent with the additional Y. I was beginning to suspect there was some sort of hierarchy amongst the conservative politicians as to who does and doesn't deserve a Y.
Although honestly, I am a little jealous that you often refer to Hammy and Willy, etc, but I I haven't earned a cute nickname of my own yet.
Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Mar 26, 2023 at 10:04.
|
|
