Test Pandemic of the Boosted Test

Rural Issues

Tools

Pandemic of the Boosted

Test
Partners's Avatar Aug 5, 2022 | 08:35 301
Quote Originally Posted by chuckChuck View Post
Only to be surpassed in stupidity by the antivaxers covid deniers who say ivermectin cures and prevents covid, taken after claiming covid is nothing to worry about. LOL
Us anti Covid poison shot people don't wear masks like you boosted idiots.
Can spot your type in every store, and outside like pic shows.. Reply With Quote
  • 2 Likes


  • Aug 5, 2022 | 09:16 302 Name:  D87E53D2-4709-4F3E-B04C-48BBDC9B7539.jpg
Views: 202
Size:  13.1 KB Reply With Quote
  • 4 Likes


  • Aug 5, 2022 | 18:32 303 I’m a vaccine believer. Got my 3 shots and carry on so I don’t need a stupid mask or have to live in the fear. If that’s not enough and I get sick and die so be it. I’m not holding anything against someone who’s masked up. That is their choice and it’s not hurting anyone else. However, at this point if all the modern science and medicine can’t prevent you or I from getting sick and dying what is the bloody point of living the Andromeda Strain type scenario? The deer die off from cold winters or chronic wasting disease. Coyotes get the mange and die. Think we’ve got accustomed to not dying off in the last 100 years because of advances in nutrition and medicine but previous to that it was nothing to see those sorts of things. Reply With Quote
  • 2 Likes


  • biglentil's Avatar Aug 5, 2022 | 20:12 304 The anology of masks being the equivalent to a chainlink fence to try and stop a fly is too generous. Then there are the studies indicating the harmful bacteria and other pathogens masks harbour. Just like the covid jabs they are worse than useless, especially in elementary schools. Speech pathology is up something like 350%. However they are an effective psyop tool good at ruining human connection and reinforcing fear. Name:  Screenshot_20220805-130853_CEOca.jpg
Views: 199
Size:  61.2 KB
    Last edited by biglentil; Aug 6, 2022 at 00:07.
    Reply With Quote
  • 1 Like


  • biglentil's Avatar Aug 6, 2022 | 09:48 305 Name:  Screenshot_20220805-224416_Gallery.jpg
Views: 180
Size:  79.3 KB Reply With Quote
  • 2 Likes


  • Aug 6, 2022 | 10:40 306
    Quote Originally Posted by biglentil View Post
    The anology of masks being the equivalent to a chainlink fence to try and stop a fly is too generous. Then there are the studies indicating the harmful bacteria and other pathogens masks harbour. Just like the covid jabs they are worse than useless, especially in elementary schools. Speech pathology is up something like 350%. However they are an effective psyop tool good at ruining human connection and reinforcing fear. Name:  Screenshot_20220805-130853_CEOca.jpg
Views: 199
Size:  61.2 KB
    N 95 info for a dummy . .3 micron . Dummies like you are good at re enforcing ignorance. Reply With Quote
    biglentil's Avatar Aug 6, 2022 | 11:59 307
    Quote Originally Posted by agstar77 View Post
    N 95 info for a dummy . .3 micron . Dummies like you are good at re enforcing ignorance.
    So we agree the best fitted N95 claim to filter 95% down to .3micron. Sars Cov-2 virus is .125nm. Tell me how seiving grain with a seive over twice the size of the grain would work?


    98% of Australia's over 16 population has had at least 1 dose and they are making new covid 19 hospitalization records. Dummies still think the mandates are effective while in places like Africa with the lowest vaccination levels in the world and no mandates, covid isnt even on the radar.

    Name:  Screenshot_20220806-115212_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Views: 166
Size:  95.0 KB Name:  Screenshot_20220806-115340_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Views: 167
Size:  90.7 KB
    Last edited by biglentil; Aug 6, 2022 at 16:17.
    Reply With Quote
    Aug 6, 2022 | 15:35 308 At .3 microns the N95 keeps out even smaller particles. So nice try , do your research better. Wearing proper masks in confined areas without proper ventilation is still good protection . Reply With Quote
    biglentil's Avatar Aug 6, 2022 | 16:23 309
    Quote Originally Posted by agstar77 View Post
    At .3 microns the N95 keeps out even smaller particles. So nice try , do your research better. Wearing proper masks in confined areas without proper ventilation is still good protection .
    Lefty math a .125micron virus particle is bigger then the porosity of a .3 micron N95.
    Last edited by biglentil; Aug 6, 2022 at 16:27.
    Reply With Quote
    Aug 6, 2022 | 19:59 310 Wait. There are still people who actually think masks work? Reply With Quote
  • 3 Likes


  • Aug 6, 2022 | 20:32 311
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheepwheat View Post
    Wait. There are still people who actually think masks work?
    As opposed to the uninformed that believe in iver. Reply With Quote
    Partners's Avatar Aug 6, 2022 | 21:02 312
    Quote Originally Posted by agstar77 View Post
    As opposed to the uninformed that believe in iver.
    Ag still wearing yours every here you go?
    Answer truthfully now.. Reply With Quote
  • 1 Like


  • Aug 6, 2022 | 22:05 313 I’m not absolutely certain but I do know that through transplant ordeal where 62 days were spent in hospital, I was masked, have zero immunity and was surrounded by people who were around Covid a lot of the time and I never caught it-yet. So hard to believe but maybe masks do work. Never say never, and never say always, you’ll look less a fool if you are wrong. 😂 Reply With Quote

  • biglentil's Avatar Aug 7, 2022 | 07:48 314 Name:  Screenshot_20220807-074348_Twitter.jpg
Views: 137
Size:  82.3 KB

    Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a large consensus among medical professionals that masks could not control the outbreak of a respiratory virus. In fact, both Dr. Fauci and Sanjay Gupta have confirmed this.
    They both know the science never changed, just the politics. Let’s travel back in time, before our collective amnesia.

    DATA LINKS:

    The list below contains various links to a range of data, including sources such as the European CDC and Oxford.

    1. “Facemasks do have a clear role in maintaining the social cleanliness of surgical staff, but evidence is lacking to suggest that they confer protection from infection either to patients or to the surgeons that wear them.”
    SOURCE: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0141076815583167

    2. “The studies described the use of surgical masks in surgery with post-operative infections as endpoint, and the studies had to include a control group. None of the four studies found a difference in the number of post-operative infections whether you used a surgical mask or not.”
    SOURCE: https://europepmc.org/article/med/25294675

    3. There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. “We did not find evidence that surgical-type face masks are effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza transmission, either when worn by infected persons (source control) or by persons in the general community to reduce their susceptibility.”
    SOURCE: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

    4. “Did not seem to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections nor against clinical respiratory infection.”
    SOURCE: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240287#sec013

    5. “Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illness”
    SOURCE: https://www.cochrane.org/CD006207/ARI_do-physical-measures-such-hand-washing-or-wearing-masks-stop-or-slow-down-spread-respiratory-viruses

    6. “We did not observe association between mask mandates or use and reduced COVID-19 spread in US states” SOURCE: https://escipub.com/irjph-2021-08-1005/

    7. “In sum, wearing surgical masks in households appears to have very little impact on transmission of respiratory disease.”
    SOURCE: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data

    8. Everyone wore masks during the 1918 flu pandemic. They were useless
    SOURCE: https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2020/04/02/everyone-wore-masks-during-1918-flu-pandemic-they-were-useless/

    9. “No statistically significant difference between those who wore masks and those who did not when it came to being infected by Covid-19. 1.8 per cent of those wearing masks caught Covid, compared to 2.1 per cent of the control group.”
    SOURCE: (https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/do-masks-stop-the-spread-of-covid-19-)

    10. “This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.”
    SOURCE: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/

    11. “Masks have not been demonstrated to have a degree of efficiency that would warrant their compulsory application for the checking of epidemics.”
    SOURCE: https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdf/10.2105/AJPH.10.1.34

    12. “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.”
    SOURCE: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372

    13. “Face mask use in health care workers has not been demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.”
    SOURCE: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/

    14. “There was no increase in wound infections when masks were discarded in I 980; in fact there was a significant decrease.”
    SOURCE: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/pdf/annrcse01509-0009.pdf

    15. “It would appear that despite two decades of pandemic preparedness, there is considerable uncertainty as to the value of wearing masks.”
    SOURCE: (https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/masking-lack-of-evidence-with-politics/)

    16. As recently as 2010, the US National Academy of Sciences declared that, in the community setting, “face masks are not designed or certified to protect the wearer from exposure to respiratory hazards.”
    SOURCE: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868614/#b5-1880606

    17. “Neither surgical nor cotton masks effectively filtered SARS-CoV-2 during coughs by infected patients.” “more viral particles were found on the outside than on the inside of masks tested.”
    SOURCE: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-1342

    18. “The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks during seasonal influenza. There were no clear differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators in healthcare workers when used in routine care to reduce respiratory viral infection”
    SOURCE: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub5/full

    19. “There’s simply no significant difference attributable to mask mandates”
    SOURCE: (https://ianmsc.substack.com/p/every-comparison-shows-masks-are) Reply With Quote
    Aug 7, 2022 | 09:16 315 BC has quietly removed all the famous Covid donut charts, yes, even including the historic ones from their website.

    When the rate of infection, hospitalization, deaths in boosted and vaxxed blows to smithereens the infections, hospitalizations and deaths among unvaxxed, I guess you have to do something.

    Imagine how much worse it would have been without the vax….. Reply With Quote

  • Aug 7, 2022 | 10:02 316
    Quote Originally Posted by Partners View Post
    Ag still wearing yours every here you go?
    Answer truthfully now..
    All indoor spaces with others. Have not had covid. Reply With Quote
    biglentil's Avatar Aug 7, 2022 | 12:32 317
    Quote Originally Posted by agstar77 View Post
    All indoor spaces with others. Have not had covid.
    Single mask on Zoom? Double indoors? Reply With Quote
    biglentil's Avatar Aug 7, 2022 | 14:16 318 Descent into Madness (2020)

    https://rumble.com/embed/v1cfdp1/?pub=4 Reply With Quote
    biglentil's Avatar Aug 7, 2022 | 14:55 319
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheepwheat View Post
    BC has quietly removed all the famous Covid donut charts, yes, even including the historic ones from their website.

    When the rate of infection, hospitalization, deaths in boosted and vaxxed blows to smithereens the infections, hospitalizations and deaths among unvaxxed, I guess you have to do something.

    Imagine how much worse it would have been without the vax…..
    You know they are worried when they need to bury and obfuscate the data. Is hiding data now "science"?

    This is a real tweet from Pfizer Inc. Why do you think 'Trust In Science' is missing?

    Name:  Screenshot_20220807-144904_Twitter.jpg
Views: 112
Size:  84.0 KB Reply With Quote
    Aug 9, 2022 | 06:52 320 Its only the flat earthers and rabid antivaxers who have lost trust in science who like to pick what science they trust and what science they don't trust without any credible explanation.

    The vast majority of people in Canada trust the science that shows vaccines work very well and are good health care policy and the data backs them up.

    Alberta data per 100,000 clearly shows the vaccines reduce severe illness, hospitalizations and deaths. Especialliy in older seniors by many times compared to the unvaccinated.

    Only the obsessive antivax dullards who can't tell credible sources of information from crap sources believe otherwise. Reply With Quote
    Aug 9, 2022 | 07:37 321 hmmmm...
    youtu.be/PfNNgJ7DarU Reply With Quote
  • 1 Like


  • Partners's Avatar Aug 9, 2022 | 08:32 322 Science is bought and paid for like the media ..
    Stop beating your dead horse Chuck. Reply With Quote
  • 1 Like


  • Aug 9, 2022 | 09:03 323 Name:  244F15F8-0ABA-4A89-BCC1-74C559ED8987.jpg
Views: 63
Size:  16.0 KB Reply With Quote

  • jazz's Avatar Aug 9, 2022 | 12:25 324 Remember when scientists actually invented shit instead of doing mouse studies on the govt dime.

    Those VIDO vax freaks in Stoon have $50M in govt hand outs and 2 yrs later cant get anything done with it. Reply With Quote
    Partners's Avatar Aug 9, 2022 | 12:56 325
    Quote Originally Posted by jazz View Post
    Remember when scientists actually invented shit instead of doing mouse studies on the govt dime.

    Those VIDO vax freaks in Stoon have $50M in govt hand outs and 2 yrs later cant get anything done with it.
    Maybe Vido tried, but No successful vax for covid? Reply With Quote
  • 1 Like


  • Aug 9, 2022 | 13:13 326 My eternal foolish optimism the money to VIDO wasn’t solely for developing Covid vaccine but further developing the MRNA editing techniques for making other vaccines both human and animal. If mRNA vaccines prove out safe, effective, and quicker and more economical it will be a boon to not only human health but also the livestock industry. Now if MRNA vaccines turn out to shrink your dick and give you a third breast like some purport then it was a big waste. Reply With Quote
    fjlip's Avatar Aug 9, 2022 | 15:01 327 Shamefully Ozzies 96% vaxed....record cases since 2020 in 2-3-4 vaxed . Explain Covidiots/rabid vaxers?
    The shit either does NOT work, wanes or hurts/kills! Reply With Quote
    Aug 9, 2022 | 15:19 328
    Quote Originally Posted by fjlip View Post
    Shamefully Ozzies 96% vaxed....record cases since 2020 in 2-3-4 vaxed . Explain Covidiots/rabid vaxers?
    The shit either does NOT work, wanes or hurts/kills!
    Not referring to the Covid vaccines here but mRNA vaccines in general. I’m a bit suspicious of them as well because they were pushed out in desperation and even after 20 years of buggering around with them this is the first time they’ve been used. Long term effects need to be quantified if they do exist. That’s proper process. Far as effectiveness of the Covid vaccines their efficacy is waning. Sure they’ve probably helped some but now it’s down to natural herd immunity. Reply With Quote
    biglentil's Avatar Aug 9, 2022 | 16:04 329
    Quote Originally Posted by fjlip View Post
    Shamefully Ozzies 96% vaxed....record cases since 2020 in 2-3-4 vaxed . Explain Covidiots/rabid vaxers?
    The shit either does NOT work, wanes or hurts/kills!
    Record covid deaths in Australia as well. Then there is the "Unknown" category of death that has rocketed to be the #1 spot. Worse than a disaster.... Dump your shares in life insurance co's and go long undertakers.

    Name:  Screenshot_20220809-081038_CEOca.jpg
Views: 229
Size:  70.6 KB Reply With Quote
    Aug 9, 2022 | 17:05 330 Name:  CE3903C0-28C7-4B23-B916-E3C42B52F82E.jpg
Views: 213
Size:  15.6 KB. similar in germany , but jab fans dont let us put ye off taking lots more of the safe 💉 Reply With Quote
  • 1 Like