• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Making ethanol from corn is the least efficient use of farmland

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Making ethanol from corn is the least efficient use of farmland

    https://www.freeingenergy.com/replace-farmland-farm-corn-ethanol-solar-panels/

    Making ethanol from corn is the least efficient use of farmland

    Bill Nussey March 12, 2021

    American farmland may be the next frontier in renewable energy. Not only does leasing land for solar energy production generate far more energy, but it might also be the key to saving thousands of small family-run farms.

    The silent struggles of family farms in America

    At $416 billion, American farm debt is at an all-time high. Since 2013, over half of all farmers have lost money each year and farm loan delinquencies are on the rise. From 2011 to 2018, the US lost more than 100,000 farms; 12,000 of which were lost between 2017 and 2018 alone.

    Many agricultural markets in the US are being artificially propped up by government subsidies and federal laws. In particular, the market for corn, the largest agricultural crop in the United States, is backed by a long history of subsidies and federal laws, including laws that require nearly all US gasoline to contain 10% ethanol, nearly all of which comes from corn.

    Every year, US farmers plant around 140,000 square miles of corn, 30% of which is used to produce ethanol. Between 1978 and 2018, the ethanol industry received a variety of subsidies totaling $86 billion dollars, more than both the solar and wind industry combined. Despite all this government support, ethanol is often a money losing proposition for farmers. It is also one of the least efficient ways to generate energy. So, what if American corn farmers replaced their fields with solar farms?
    An acre of solar produces far more energy than corn


    If you compare the energy utility of an acre of solar panels to an acre of corn, the acre of solar wins by a landslide.

    Each year, one acre of corn produces 551 gallons of ethanol, which is the equivalent of 386 gallons of gas. Using the average miles per gallon of a US automobile, this equates to 9,691 miles driven per acre of corn per year.

    In Iowa, an acre of solar panels produces 198,870 kilowatt hours each year. A typical EV drives approximately 3.6 miles per kilowatt hour. So, each year, an acre of solar panels produces enough energy for an EV to drive 710,250 miles. This is over 70 times the distance the same acre producing corn could provide.

    Unlike ethanol, an acre of solar can power anything attached to the grid. The same Iowa acre, for instance, could also be used to provide 18 average US homes with electricity for the year.

    The financial utility of replacing corn with solar also promises huge gains for farmers. For example, it is not uncommon for a farmer to make two to three times more money per acre leasing to solar rather than planting corn. Solar also guarantees a steady stream of revenue, unlike corn which stands the risk of crop failure and price volatility.

    Moreover, solar panels can successfully coexist with corn crops using a practice known as “agrivoltaics.” This technique has been found to increase corn yield per square meter and to generate nearly five times the amount of revenue of a traditional corn field.

    Solar power for small farms

    Independent farming is an increasingly difficult way to earn a living. In 2017, small farms, defined as those bringing in under $350,000 a year prior to expenses, made up less than a quarter of total US agricultural production. This is down from nearly 50% in the early 1990s.

    Why are small farms failing at such tragic rates? One reason is the uncertainty of the price for corn. In 2018, the harvest price for corn was 7% below the projected price per bushel, and this decline is not out of the ordinary. From 1972 to 2017, 49% of the years saw declines greater than 7%. For small farms, where profit margins are razor thin, these price shocks can be the difference between making ends meet and bankruptcy.

    When farmers lease their land for solar energy production they do not have to worry about renegotiating a land lease or finding a new tenant every couple of years. In addition, the value of the land is not jeopardized by changes in global agricultural markets, policy, or extreme weather. For the farmer, the land can become a self-sustaining, highly predictable source of income for decades.

    Another reason small farms are struggling is weather. For instance, in the spring of 2019, heavy precipitation flooded croplands throughout much of the Midwest forcing many farmers to leave their fields empty. According to the US Department of Agriculture, only 58% of the corn that could be planted that year made it into the ground. This amounted to massive losses for corn farmers, many of whom have no other source of revenue.

    Between 2011 and 2017, there were 84 extreme weather events in the US which caused $675 billion in damage total. If recent upticks in extreme weather persist, some researchers estimate that corn yields could decline as much as 15% to 30% in the coming years. This is where solar comes in.

    Unlike farming, solar energy production does not depend on mild weather or a predictable local climate. Even on rainy or foggy days, solar panels will produce at about 10% to 30% of their capacity. Therefore, over the course of several months, an acre of solar will generate far more energy and income for small farmers than corn ever could.

    So why wait? Solar leasing promises huge financial gains to farmers who would otherwise be at the mercy of volatile agricultural markets. And agrivoltaic practices allow farmers to increase total yield and net revenue by interspersing their crops with solar panels. What’s more, solar power production is far more energy-efficient than corn-based ethanol production, making it a great choice for the farmer, consumer, and environment as well.

    #2
    This post seems to be relevant to not only agriculture, but also commodity marketing
    Why did you post it out here in the hinterland instead of in the proper forum?

    Or did you lose all privileges?

    Edit, moderators ( assuming anyone ever checks in over here), can you consider moving this thread to the Commodity Marketing forum, and if Chuck indeed abused and therefore lost his priviledge to post there, consider reinstating him, if he is able to post relevant threads such as this?
    Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Mar 15, 2022, 08:37.

    Comment


      #3
      "In Iowa, an acre of solar panels produces 198,870 kilowatt hours each year. A typical EV drives approximately 3.6 miles per kilowatt hour. So, each year, an acre of solar panels produces enough energy for an EV to drive 710,250 miles. This is over 70 times the distance the same acre producing corn could provide.". No idea how true this is but seems hard to believe.

      Comment


        #4
        Keep up the good work Chuck.
        There's more than one section in a newspaper. I can ignore or remove the unread sections easier.
        Fuel from grain has never ever made sense to me.

        Comment


          #5
          Nothing has to make sense.
          It just has to appear to make the mandated goals possible.
          Fuel from grain will only increase. It's the only way to achieve short term goals.
          Include biomass wood pellets etc.
          The other that stands out is the replacing plastic bags, straws etc with paper. Pulp mill startups everywhere. More employment mowing trees.

          Comment


            #6
            Fuel from grain may not make enough sense, but what it does do is create a large buffer of a grain reserve, which could be devoted back onto the food/feed industry, without having burdensome actual reserved of grain in storage.
            Kind of important in the era of just in time every thing.

            And as with all of these critiques, he completely ignores the byproducts which end up in the feedbunk, and the fact that very little grain corn(relatively speaking( is consumed directly by humans.

            Comment


              #7
              Good point chuck
              It makes as much sense as burning “green” wood pellets in Europe from Sask
              Or making power with windmills and Chinese solar panels
              But unfortunately none of it has to make sense as it is plainly obvious

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
                Fuel from grain may not make enough sense, but what it does do is create a large buffer of a grain reserve, which could be devoted back onto the food/feed industry, without having burdensome actual reserved of grain in storage.
                Kind of important in the era of just in time every thing.

                And as with all of these critiques, he completely ignores the byproducts which end up in the feedbunk, and the fact that very little grain corn(relatively speaking( is consumed directly by humans.
                Along the same lines the ethanol industry not only is a food reserve but also a domestic market for which it is consumed at home and all money generated from the value adding stays at home. In the process it is a relatively stable market. If it comes to a scarcity for food all the government needs to do is drop percentages of ethanol requirements. All said does it make sense from a pure economic sense? I don’t think necessarily but food security and national security is important though.

                Comment


                  #9
                  And what is also missed in most of these analysis, is the fact that ethanol is used as the oxygenate to replace mtbe or lead which were not the most pleasant products to be emitting into our atmosphere.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
                    And what is also missed in most of these analysis, is the fact that ethanol is used as the oxygenate to replace mtbe or lead which were not the most pleasant products to be emitting into our atmosphere.
                    I didn’t know that. The more you know.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
                      And what is also missed in most of these analysis, is the fact that ethanol is used as the oxygenate to replace mtbe or lead which were not the most pleasant products to be emitting into our atmosphere.
                      Exactly ☝️
                      The very basic principle that ethanol was brought in , very few know this
                      Last edited by furrowtickler; Mar 15, 2022, 21:06.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by WiltonRanch View Post
                        I didn’t know that. The more you know.
                        But to be fair, it doesn't need to be blended to 10%, let alone 85%, and most modern EFI engines with knock sensors can function without the oxygenate.

                        However, both leaded gasoline and MTBE amongst other possibly worse chemicals are still used in other parts of the world without ethanol.

                        Difficult to prove, but it is very likely that a lot of our current health issues can be traced back to leaded gasoline, and therefore contaminating virtually everything, everywhere with lead, and it doesn't go away.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Good to learn
                          Chuck will know now also
                          Last edited by Guest; Mar 15, 2022, 20:07.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            None of this justifies that 30% of corn acres in the US that are used for ethanol.

                            How many acres of canola are destined for bio-diesel?

                            If the mantra of farmers must feed the world is to be believed then biofuels are not the solution.

                            From an energy and water usage perspective US corn is black hole.

                            As the author pointed out the corn and biofuels industry have been the beneficiaries of generous subsidies and incentives that have helped prop up grain prices.

                            How posters can opposes support for much more efficient renewable energy, but then support subsidies and incentives for very inefficient bio-fuels makes no sense.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by caseih View Post
                              Good to learn
                              Chuck will know now also
                              Looks like your optimism was misplaced.

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...