|
|
Apr 4, 2021 | 08:09
1
Take the time to sign the petition on change.org...take the time to realize how much your farm is losing while helping the environment
|
|
|
Apr 4, 2021 | 08:38
2
Can you post the link Dave?
|
|
|
Apr 4, 2021 | 08:38
3
So does this mean you are in favour of providing incentives and payments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?
|
|
|
Apr 4, 2021 | 08:39
4
The way the feds are going, the province won’t get any credits/offsets for clean coal. That was built and implemented before carbon tax liberal plan, no retroactive.
|
|
|
Apr 4, 2021 | 08:43
5
https://www.change.org/p/hon-scott-moe-carbon-credit-offsets-for-western-canadian-agriculture
Copy and paste it and you still have to do a little work to find it...but its there...Shirley there is more than 9 farmers interested in this?
Last edited by bucket; Apr 4, 2021 at 08:45.
|
|
Apr 4, 2021 | 08:44
6
 Originally Posted by Rareearth
The way the feds are going, the province won’t get any credits/offsets for clean coal. That was built and implemented before carbon tax liberal plan, no retroactive.
Canadas forests - zero credit
canadas lakes - zero credit
Canadas no til operation - zero credit
Canadas farmland sequestration - no credit
Canadas carbon capture - no credit
Canadas natural gas - no credit
Quebec hydro built off equalization - bingo we have a winner
|
|
|
Apr 4, 2021 | 08:47
7
Originally Posted by jazz
Canadas forests - zero credit
canadas lakes - zero credit
Canadas no til operation - zero credit
Canadas farmland sequestration - no credit
Canadas carbon capture - no credit
Canadas natural gas - no credit
Quebec hydro built off equalization - bingo we have a winner
Dont forget the cement industry in Quebec being exempted....that's the biggest payment of all...an exemption is a subsidy....
And that exemption requires others to offset it.
|
|
|
Apr 4, 2021 | 08:49
8
native grasslands may be getting something but there are conservation agencies like NCC and DU involved...someone is getting phucked.
|
|
|
Apr 4, 2021 | 08:56
9
So does this mean you are in favour of providing incentives and payments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?
Why avoid answering the question? If you want to be paid for capturing carbon there must be a reason?
|
|
|
Apr 4, 2021 | 09:02
10
Originally Posted by chuckChuck
So does this mean you are in favour of providing incentives and payments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?
Why avoid answering the question? If you want to be paid for capturing carbon there must be a reason?
It is because no one gives a s h i t about what you have to say, or cut/paste, or keep stirring the pot.
|
|
|
Apr 4, 2021 | 09:02
11
Originally Posted by chuckChuck
So does this mean you are in favour of providing incentives and payments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?
Why avoid answering the question? If you want to be paid for capturing carbon there must be a reason?
Yup there is a reason ...because I am paying for my and others emissions...and more than likely the farm sequesters more than I emit.
And the fact that my farm is being used to offset other industries without compensation.
|
|
|
Apr 4, 2021 | 09:15
12
So that must mean you are in favour of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
There would be no reason to pay farmers for carbon credits otherwise.
|
|
|
Apr 4, 2021 | 09:25
13
Originally Posted by chuckChuck
So that must mean you are in favour of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
There would be no reason to pay farmers for carbon credits otherwise.
I think you realize that farmers have already reduced their emissions with the current farming practices...
The only thing is farmers are not being paid to sequester which is an ongoing exercise..
Every other industry that has done nothing to reduce their emissions will be given a government grant to do so and then be given credits after..
Farmers have done most of the reductions on their own dime.
This includes the investments in machinery and genetics and crop rotations.
|
|
|
Apr 4, 2021 | 12:18
14
Originally Posted by chuckChuck
So does this mean you are in favour of providing incentives and payments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?
Why avoid answering the question? If you want to be paid for capturing carbon there must be a reason?
Why answer your questions Chuck2 you never answer mine!!
|
|
|
Apr 4, 2021 | 12:25
15
Originally Posted by chuckChuck
So that must mean you are in favour of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
There would be no reason to pay farmers for carbon credits otherwise.
Why are they going to pay carbon credits to farmers in the U.S.A.? There is no carbon tax in the U.S.A.!!
|
|
Apr 5, 2021 | 13:45
16
The only reason to ***** myself to this program would be because everyone else is. Don't have to agree to cash the check.
|
|
Apr 5, 2021 | 16:52
17
Ah the pest crawled out of his hole. Don’t answer his questions he never can answer any of ours it’s all cut and paste.
Imagine a liberal like chuck coming to inspect your carbon sink
|
|
