• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A climate success story: How Alberta got off coal power

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    A climate success story: How Alberta got off coal power

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-a-climate-success-story-how-alberta-got-off-coal-power/ https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-a-climate-success-story-how-alberta-got-off-coal-power/

    A climate success story: How Alberta got off coal power

    In 2015, roughly half of Alberta’s electricity came from burning coal. Mostly thanks to coal, greenhouse gas emissions from power generation were nearly 50 megatonnes a year.

    That number is equivalent to two-thirds of the emissions from the entire oil sands. It’s equal to the emissions from every single car and truck in Ontario and Quebec. Yet no Hollywood star ever showed up to protest at one of the coal plants in Parkland County, west of Edmonton.

    And now, here’s the good news: By 2023, Alberta will stop burning coal for power. It will accomplish this seven years ahead of schedule.

    It’s a significant milestone, and no random miracle. It’s the market in action, and the direct result of carefully drawn public policies – namely, the carbon tax.

    The story stretches back to 2007, when Alberta instituted North America’s first carbon tax on industry. It was, however, only a small levy, whose extra costs on coal power didn’t make much difference.

    The turning point came in 2015. A newly elected New Democratic Party government announced an ambitious climate strategy. Getting off coal by 2030 was a central pillar.

    Emissions from power generation were down to 44 megatonnes in 2017. The following year, the NDP’s tougher rules kicked in, and emissions immediately fell. The rules set a pollution target for all power plants to hit, and the dirtier an operation, the more it would pay. Burning coal suddenly became a lot more costly and power companies responded, mostly by turning to natural gas. In 2018, the use of coal plummeted – and emissions fell by a quarter in a single year, to 33 megatonnes.

    The transition has not been free or painless. The end of coal reverberates in communities that were built on the industry, and government programs have invested money in hard-hit places like Parkland County.

    Alberta is also paying $1.4-billion in compensation to three power companies, money coming out of the province’s carbon tax revenue. Power rates, meanwhile, have remained reasonable.

    Despite challenges, the plan is working. The final dominos are starting to fall. In November, TransAlta said it would stop burning coal at the end of 2021. In December, Capital Power said it will be off coal by 2023, as it spends $1-billion to convert two plants to gas.

    And that’s it. Like Ontario before – the province went coal-free in 2014 – Alberta’s power will be liberated from coal.

    The transition also survived a change in provincial government. Before Jason Kenney became Premier, he was a fierce defender of coal. In late 2016, he told Facebook followers that “Jason digs coal” and said the coal power shutdown would only “stroke the egos of extreme environmental professional activists.”

    But even as Mr. Kenney in office has railed against Ottawa’s consumer carbon tax, he quietly kept the NDP’s strict carbon rules for power generation.

    The quick end of coal in Alberta is being made possible by a ready supply of cheap natural gas. This is progress, but in the long run, more will be needed. That’s because, although natural gas is less polluting than coal, it still produces about half as much greenhouse gas emissions per unit of energy. A bigger search for alternatives, from the obvious solar and wind to the currently less viable nuclear and carbon capture, will be necessary. Research from the Pembina Institute shows that a combination of clean power technologies compete well against natural gas.

    A rising carbon tax helps, too.

    Other provinces with big parts of their electricity sector powered by coal – Saskatchewan, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia – need to look to Alberta’s template. There are doubts the national coal-free goal of 2030 will be met.

    It is important to appreciate what has been accomplished: a lot, in a short time. By 2023, power generation in Alberta will be producing a bit more than 20 megatonnes of greenhouse gas emissions a year – less than half the 2015 level. That’s a reduction equivalent to shutting down a third of the oil sands, or taking every car and truck off the road in Alberta, Saskatchewan and British Columbia.

    In the span of half a decade, a bad news climate story became a good news climate story. As Canada aims for net-zero emissions by 2050, it’s a reminder of what’s possible.
    Last edited by chuckChuck; Dec 26, 2020, 09:13.

    #2
    How Canada Killed Coal

    At the same time, BC. is the largest seller of Coal world wide.

    China is building Coal-fired Power plants faster than light speed.

    **** you and your Bullshit.

    Comment


      #3
      Saskatchewan increases carbon price for large emitters to $40 per tonne
      Social Sharing

      https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/saskatchewan-carbon-pricing-for-large-emitters-new-1.5851622 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/saskatchewan-carbon-pricing-for-large-emitters-new-1.5851622

      Small oil and gas companies in Saskatchewan can now opt for provincial carbon pricing instead of federal
      Mickey Djuric · CBC News · Posted: Dec 22, 2020 12:03 PM CT | Last Updated: December 22
      The Saskatchewan government has increased its carbon pricing on heavy emitters. (Jason Franson/The Canadian Press)

      The Saskatchewan government has raised the carbon price for large emitters to $40/tonne, an increase from $30/tonne.

      However, companies that are not compliant with emission standards won't have to settle their bill until next year.

      The province says the money will be collected in October 2021 and will go into the Saskatchewan Technology Fund, which is one of three compliance funds under the province's Prairie Resilience climate change plan.

      "It's there for the use of regulated emitters to lower their emissions at their facilities," said David Stevenson, director of climate change policy and programs with the Ministry of Environment. "So money comes in and they can apply for that money to come back out and make reductions at their facilities."

      The province says it is not calling this price on carbon emissions a "carbon tax" because it is just one way larger industries can choose to reduce their emissions.

      The other options include purchasing offset credits through a cap and trade, or meeting performance standards.
      Small oil and gas companies can now opt for provincial carbon pricing

      Large emitters in Saskatchewan operate under a different carbon-pricing system that exempts them from the federal carbon tax. This is because their emissions are priced under the provincial standards.

      Companies that emit more than 25,000 tonnes of CO2e were already provincially regulated. However, now small upstream oil and gas companies can now choose to opt into the province's plan over the federal program.

      This offers smaller companies flexibility, Stevenson said.

      "While many of the oil and gas facilities are quite small, each pump for example doesn't emit much, but as an aggregate we do. So what we allowed the oil and gas sector to do is aggregate all those facilities together," Stevenson said.

      According to Stevenson, there are 66 large-emitting facilities registered, along with 24 large aggregate facilities containing more than 10,000 individual facilities.

      Stevenson said the government is anticipating another 200 facilities to join the program in small groupings.

      "It provides that shelter from the carbon tax, and it allows for companies to make these reductions in a way that suits them best," Stevenson said. "So they can choose to either pay into a technology fund, they can choose to buy an offset credit, or they can choose to use a best performance credit if they earned one, or can buy one from someone else."
      Greenhouse gas offset program delayed to 2022

      The province's greenhouse gas offset program was scheduled to launch in January 2021, but the launch has been pushed back to 2022.

      "With COVID we haven't been able to do the engagement with the public and stakeholders like we had planned," Stevenson said.

      The program — which is still being developed — will issue offset credits for the sequestration or reduction of greenhouse gases. Those credits then could be sold to other organizations to account for their emissions.

      "For example, we plan on developing an offset protocol for landfill gas emissions. So if you have a landfill and it's emitting methane, you can convert that to electricity or burn that methane off, and you can earn a credit."

      The province anticipates the offset program will result in a 10 per cent reduction in emissions.

      Comment


        #4
        H e r e is where this thread dies.


        Bye bye chuck

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by SASKFARMER View Post
          How Canada Killed Coal

          At the same time, BC. is the largest seller of Coal world wide.

          China is building Coal-fired Power plants faster than light speed.

          **** you and your Bullshit.
          BC is not even close! LOL Is this an example of your "alternate" facts?

          Below are the 15 countries that exported the highest dollar value worth of coal during 2019.

          Australia: US$44.4 billion (37.5% of total coal exports)
          Indonesia: $21.5 billion (18.2%)
          Russia: $16 billion (13.5%)
          United States: $9.8 billion (8.3%)
          Colombia: $5.2 billion (4.4%)
          Canada: $5.2 billion (4.4%)
          South Africa: $4.8 billion (4.1%)
          Netherlands: $3.2 billion (2.7%)
          Mongolia: $3.1 billion (2.6%)
          Mozambique: $1 billion (0.9%)
          China: $932.8 million (0.8%)
          Poland: $622.8 million (0.5%)
          Philippines: $460.6 million (0.4%)
          Kazakhstan: $449.7 million (0.4%)
          Belgium: $217.3 million (0.2%)

          http://www.worldstopexports.com/coal-exports-country/ http://www.worldstopexports.com/coal-exports-country/
          Last edited by chuckChuck; Dec 26, 2020, 09:30.

          Comment


            #6
            Alberta was dubiously first in canuckistan with a cap and tax scam for carbon and it was done by the PC's, not the NDP first. Wasting billions on converting to gas prematurely is not wise in a depressionary economy as we will find out the hard way. We are certainly blessed by an abundant supply of natural gas but for grid stability and economic reasons it would be wise to maintain some coal fired generation with the fuel supply next to the generation plant. We now have an entire economy in canuckistan based on pogey in one form or another and cheap base load coal fire electricity will be necessary in the future to transition back to a market based economy. The grope and flail is just a government propaganda sheet.

            Comment


              #7
              The shock of realizing both Alberta and Saskatchewan have a carbon tax must have been too much for SF. LOL

              Yep. Its very ironic that both Saskatchewan and Alberta both have a carbon tax on large emitters. And in the case of Alberta have rapidly changed electricity generation from coal to natural gas with very significant savings in emissions.

              Now the next step is for both provinces to take over the federal carbon pricing and design a system that supports industries that are disproportionately affected which could include agriculture.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by ajl View Post
                Alberta was dubiously first in canuckistan with a cap and tax scam for carbon and it was done by the PC's, not the NDP first. Wasting billions on converting to gas prematurely is not wise in a depressionary economy as we will find out the hard way. We are certainly blessed by an abundant supply of natural gas but for grid stability and economic reasons it would be wise to maintain some coal fired generation with the fuel supply next to the generation plant. We now have an entire economy in canuckistan based on pogey in one form or another and cheap base load coal fire electricity will be necessary in the future to transition back to a market based economy. The grope and flail is just a government propaganda sheet.
                Gas is cheaper and cleaner and coal is never coming back in Canada. Using more gas will drive demand. Converting coal plants to gas created jobs and economic activity.
                Last edited by chuckChuck; Dec 26, 2020, 09:45.

                Comment


                  #9
                  These are the coal plants in the world. White dots are older ones built 30-40 yrs ago, new ones are yellow built in last 5-15

                  Chuck, delete your thread and then go outside and dump a bucket of ice on your head. You might just wake up.

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	na coal.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	49.6 KB
ID:	770573
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	e coal.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	54.3 KB
ID:	770574

                  Comment


                    #10
                    https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-will-china-build-hundreds-of-new-coal-plants-in-the-2020s https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-will-china-build-hundreds-of-new-coal-plants-in-the-2020s

                    Analysis: Will China build hundreds of new coal plants in the 2020s?

                    Comment


                      #11
                      BC , Canada , is the largest coal exporter in North America , even outdoing West Virginia , two faced pricks

                      Comment


                        #12
                        US Coal Power Generation Plummets 30% in 2020, EIA Says

                        Coal power fell by a record amount last year, and things have gone downhill quickly from there for the embattled sector.

                        https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/us-coal-generation-plunges-30-in-first-half-of-2020-eia-says https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/us-coal-generation-plunges-30-in-first-half-of-2020-eia-says

                        U.S. coal power generation plunged by 30 percent in the first half of 2020 off an already-depressed base, shoved out by natural gas and renewables amid low energy prices linked to the COVID-19 pandemic, according to new figures from the Energy Information Administration.

                        Since its peak in 2007, U.S. coal consumption has been on the decline. But the trajectory of its fall has been getting steeper, and 2020 looks set to be an unprecedentedly terrible year for the sector.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          no worries, china is picking up the slack
                          and BC, Canada is feeding them

                          Comment


                            #14
                            And this success story has absolutely nothing to do with wind or solar. Switching from one fossil fuel to another. Not quite clear why Chuck is supporting this let alone advertising it to everyone?

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
                              And this success story has absolutely nothing to do with wind or solar. Switching from one fossil fuel to another. Not quite clear why Chuck is supporting this let alone advertising it to everyone?
                              well, its complicated , lol ,lmao
                              he obviously didn't think it through , and was started by a conservative govt , lol,lol,lol

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...