• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pallister Steals Xmas

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Well we all know he bought USA$$$, maybe he could buy some condos while living there.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by dmlfarmer View Post
      Hey Jazz, you know how you predicted in August that the virus would disappear after November 4th and that deaths were not going to go up in the US - This week Corvid 19 has become the number one cause of deaths in the US.

      Can't wait until January 1 to see if Covid will be in the news because if it is, you pledged to leave this forum.
      Thats interesting, which category of comorbidities did you choose to ignore?

      Because Johns Hopkins has shown no increase in overall deaths in the US. If a new condition emerged that was a separate significant cause of mortality, that would have shown. Nobody extra is dying.

      So we know just what the cdc told us 3 months ago. Only a small fraction of covid deaths are attributed to covid. Everything else is wrapped up in all cause mortality.

      I was a hell of a lot closer than your 400M death estimate.

      But please, go ahead and rebut Johns Hopkins.

      https://web.archive.org/web/20201126163323/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19 A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by jazz View Post
        Thats interesting, which category of comorbidities did you choose to ignore?

        Because Johns Hopkins has shown no increase in overall deaths in the US. If a new condition emerged that was a separate significant cause of mortality, that would have shown. Nobody extra is dying.

        So we know just what the cdc told us 3 months ago. Only a small fraction of covid deaths are attributed to covid. Everything else is wrapped up in all cause mortality.

        I was a hell of a lot closer than your 400M death estimate.

        But please, go ahead and rebut Johns Hopkins.

        https://web.archive.org/web/20201126163323/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19 A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19
        Easily. Johns Hopkins ( the actual university, not the independent student newspaper) called you dangerous and a conspiracy theorist of the absolute worst kind. Go ahead and rebut that.

        "The Editors-in-Chief decided to delete the article because of these urgent concerns, explaining on social media that the piece was being taken out of context and used to spread dangerous misinformation."

        https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/12/on-the-retraction-of-a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-and-our-coverage-of-covid-19 https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/12/on-the-retraction-of-a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-and-our-coverage-of-covid-19

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by tweety View Post
          Easily. Johns Hopkins ( the actual university, not the independent student newspaper) called you dangerous and a conspiracy theorist of the absolute worst kind. Go ahead and rebut that.

          "The Editors-in-Chief decided to delete the article because of these urgent concerns, explaining on social media that the piece was being taken out of context and used to spread dangerous misinformation."

          https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/12/on-the-retraction-of-a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-and-our-coverage-of-covid-19 https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/12/on-the-retraction-of-a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-and-our-coverage-of-covid-19
          If they wanted to throw fuel on the conspiracy theory fire, I can't think of a better way than to delete an article that doesn't support the narrative. Regardless of where you stand on this issue, that just makes it look like someone has something to hide.

          Now can someone attempt to debunk the statistic in the original article instead? Last time I looked into it, there were excess deaths, which is contrary to what this article states.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by jazz View Post
            Thats interesting, which category of comorbidities did you choose to ignore?

            Because Johns Hopkins has shown no increase in overall deaths in the US. If a new condition emerged that was a separate significant cause of mortality, that would have shown. Nobody extra is dying.

            So we know just what the cdc told us 3 months ago. Only a small fraction of covid deaths are attributed to covid. Everything else is wrapped up in all cause mortality.

            I was a hell of a lot closer than your 400M death estimate.

            But please, go ahead and rebut Johns Hopkins.

            https://web.archive.org/web/20201126163323/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19 A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19
            more BS. I have never made any death estimates and certainly not 400M.

            Comment


              #36
              I think Pallister must not have wanted another term......
              Mouth in overdrive and brain in neutral.
              Go ahead and think it but don't verbalize it. Filter broke?
              Slow down and choose words wisely.
              It's possible to get your strong opinion/point across with tact and diplomacy.

              Frustrated?

              All elected political ideologies must be conspiring........ what other logical explanation can there be?

              Can't wait for this to be over.....

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by tweety View Post
                Easily. Johns Hopkins ( the actual university, not the independent student newspaper) called you dangerous and a conspiracy theorist of the absolute worst kind. Go ahead and rebut that.

                "The Editors-in-Chief decided to delete the article because of these urgent concerns, explaining on social media that the piece was being taken out of context and used to spread dangerous misinformation."
                Took a lot of words to say scrubbed from the internet because it didnt fit the fear narrative. Now JH is back in form with their scaremongering.

                So let me see, a 125 yr old sanctioned publication from the university got censored for the first time.

                Give me a break tweety, are you gullible or what.

                Anyone with half a brain can see all these deaths from other categories rolled up into covid now.

                There is no excess mortality. The total annual deaths are right on par with other years.

                From cdc;

                2013 2,596,993
                2014 2,626,418
                2015 2,712,630
                2016 2,744,248
                2017 2,813,503
                2018 2,839,205
                2019 2,855,000
                2020 ytd 2,512,880

                So if a scary news disease has emerged and taken the top spot, where are the excess deaths?

                Comment


                  #38
                  I agree Jazz, the numbers don’t support the hysteria at all. Some Covid survivors say they have lost their sense of smell, how serious is that? Just askin.
                  Last edited by sumdumguy; Dec 5, 2020, 05:37.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Or CTV, editing out the REAL facts that till November 27 only a total of 166 Canadians outside of LTC died. Truth gets out once in a while, it is real hard to keep all the lies straight.

                    http://https://www.bitchute.com/video/yFPZsm5UteU6/?fbclid=IwAR0E8i1qSvvQ5vZfvSPmCLU8g0E93aL8363htxXM jEZjrN0xjz1jIeE8cSM http://https://www.bitchute.com/video/yFPZsm5UteU6/?fbclid=IwAR0E8i1qSvvQ5vZfvSPmCLU8g0E93aL8363htxXM jEZjrN0xjz1jIeE8cSM

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Flu is real but not a pandemic by any means. If this was so bad we would be dying like flies in the pig barn zapper. If all the political parties are on the same narrative of hysteria there is something more they are working towards and that is their control experiment and by the looks of things most people are following the pied piper. But it will grow old in a hurry when people start losing their jobs, businesses, homes and their freedom and most importantly FOOD. Then the shit hits the fan and governments are scared to death of the chaos that will ensue which was all propagated by their poor financial management. Sometimes u have to say no and special interest groups are just that.....special!

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Originally posted by fjlip View Post
                        Or CTV, editing out the REAL facts that till November 27 only a total of 166 Canadians outside of LTC died. Truth gets out once in a while, it is real hard to keep all the lies straight.

                        http://https://www.bitchute.com/video/yFPZsm5UteU6/?fbclid=IwAR0E8i1qSvvQ5vZfvSPmCLU8g0E93aL8363htxXM jEZjrN0xjz1jIeE8cSM http://https://www.bitchute.com/video/yFPZsm5UteU6/?fbclid=IwAR0E8i1qSvvQ5vZfvSPmCLU8g0E93aL8363htxXM jEZjrN0xjz1jIeE8cSM
                        Could you please provide the source for the claim that only 166 Canadians outside LTC have died.

                        Health Canada, as of Dec 4 shows 413 deaths from Covid under the age of 60. Are there that many under 60 year olds in LTC that 413 have died? 60-70 year old bracket adds another 898 Covid deaths. What is the number of 60-70 year olds in ltc if 898 have died? And are saying that if you are over 70 and died from covid you must have been in ltc? I am sorry but you claim of only 166 deaths outside ltc is not credible based on numbers of deaths by age

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Originally posted by FarmJunkie View Post
                          But it will grow old in a hurry when people start losing their jobs, businesses, homes and their freedom and most importantly FOOD.
                          This all ties back to that push for Universal Basic Income(back years ago that was called welfare)
                          If you go on the government teat, the government controls you and you will comply. They like that idea(most people seem to be complying quite well with masks) so onward and forward.

                          PM Blackie is so whacked, that he thinks killing industry is a good thing, because without industry, there'll be less carbon going into the atmosphere.

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Listen to the CTV clip, clearly on screen left side, then later they edited out. They let it slip. Never a comment or an oops mistake. Must have been true, but covered up. Numbers all over internet but trust WHO? See if this is now BANNED? At 1:45 Yup it's f*cked by thought police.

                            http://https://www.bitchute.com/video/yFPZsm5UteU6/ http://https://www.bitchute.com/video/yFPZsm5UteU6/
                            Last edited by fjlip; Dec 5, 2020, 10:40.

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Originally posted by beaverdam View Post
                              This all ties back to that push for Universal Basic Income(back years ago that was called welfare)
                              If you go on the government teat, the government controls you and you will comply. They like that idea(most people seem to be complying quite well with masks) so onward and forward.

                              PM Blackie is so whacked, that he thinks killing industry is a good thing, because without industry, there'll be less carbon going into the atmosphere.
                              that idiot doesn't give a shit about carbon in the atmoshere
                              he has proved that many times

                              Comment


                                #45
                                Originally posted by dmlfarmer View Post
                                Could you please provide the source for the claim that only 166 Canadians outside LTC have died.

                                Health Canada, as of Dec 4 shows 413 deaths from Covid under the age of 60. Are there that many under 60 year olds in LTC that 413 have died? 60-70 year old bracket adds another 898 Covid deaths. What is the number of 60-70 year olds in ltc if 898 have died? And are saying that if you are over 70 and died from covid you must have been in ltc? I am sorry but you claim of only 166 deaths outside ltc is not credible based on numbers of deaths by age
                                Easily could be possible, LTC homes are not just for the very old. Lots of residents have had life changing illnesses like ALS, strokes as well as serious accidents that leave them needing long term care. Virtually every LTC home in this area has a few such residents.
                                Last edited by VK58; Dec 5, 2020, 10:45.

                                Comment

                                • Reply to this Thread
                                • Return to Topic List
                                Working...