• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Morgan report ...

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Morgan report ...

    Thoughts 101, Errol , Macdon ?

    https://www.themorganreport.com/blog/is-a-global-takeover-underway/

    And yes it’s market related , IMF has some very concerning remarks regarding farming that Morgan shares .

    #2
    Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
    Thoughts 101, Errol , Macdon ?

    https://www.themorganreport.com/blog/is-a-global-takeover-underway/

    And yes it’s market related , IMF has some very concerning remarks regarding farming that Morgan shares .

    It sounds batshit crazy until you start digging around. Freeland is muttering a lot of the same terms as WEF. Here's a fresh video from Schwab.

    https://youtu.be/Hx3DhoLFO4s

    Now Schwab might just enjoy listening to himself talk but you have to ask yourself is Canada still a sovereign country? Who would willing give this up... well, a prominent Canadian Maurice Strong for starters.

    A primary figure in the oligarchy’s tool box of sociopathic agents who shaped this program for depopulation and zero sum thinking over the years is a Canadian-born operative by the name of Maurice Strong. Although having died in 2015, Strong’s life and legacy are worth revisiting as it provides the modern reader a powerful, albeit ugly insight into the methods and actions of the British-Deep State agenda that so mis-shaped world history through the latter half of the 20th*century.

    While this exercise will have value for all truth seekers, this story should carry additional weight for Canadians currently witnessing*their own government collapsing*under the weight of the contradictions built into a system which Strong led in shaping (i.e.: the need for nuclear and industrial productive potential embodied by SNC Lavalin and the obedience to a “green” post-industrial paradigm antagonistic to such productive capacity).

    Journalist Elaine Dewar’s groundbreaking 1994 book*“Cloak of Green”*which every truth-seeker should read, dealt rigorously with Strong’s role as a recruit of Rockefeller assets in the 1950s, an oil baron, vice president of Power Corporation by 30, Liberal Party controller, Privy Councilor, and founder of Canada’s neo-colonial external aid policy towards Africa which tied Africa into IMF debt slaves, we will focus here on the role Strong has played since 1968 in subverting the anti-entropic potential of both his native Canada and the world at large. It was through this post-1968 role that Strong performed his most valued work for the genocidal agenda of his British masters who seek to reduce the world population to a*“carrying capacity” of less than a billion.

    RIO and Global Governance

    In 1992, Maurice Strong had been assigned to head the second Earth Summit (the first having been the 1972 Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment also chaired by Strong). The Rio Summit had established a new era in the consolidation of NGOs and corporations under the genocidal green agenda of controlled starvation masquerading behind the dogma of “sustainability’. This doctrine was formalized with*Agenda 21 and the Earth Charter, which Strong co-authored with his collaborated Jim Macneil during the 1990s. At the opening of the Rio Summit, Strong announced that industrialized countries had*“developed and benefited from the unsustainable patterns of production and consumption which have produced our present dilemma. It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class, involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing- are not sustainable. A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmentally damaging consumption patterns.”

    In a 1992 essay entitled*From Stockholm to Rio: A Journey Down a Generation, published by the UN Conference on Environment and Development, Strong wrote:

    “The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation. What is needed is recognition of the reality that in so many fields, and this is particularly true of environmental issues, it is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation-states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security.”

    Two years earlier,*Strong gave an interview*wherein he described a “fiction book” he was fantasizing about writing which he described in the following manner:

    ” What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group’s conclusion is ‘no’. The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”

    When this statement is held up parallel to this man’s peculiar life, we quickly come to see that the barrier between reality and fiction is more than a little blurry.

    In regards to digital currency and elimination of cash, absolutely, India has done it, Bermuda or Bahamas, i can't remember, last week, the US Dems have spoken about it, and the ECB and rest of the world is on the same page with an expected launch in January, simultaneously as we shift to perpetual bonds.

    Imo, yes this is happening. But wait and see what comes out of Davos in January at their "Twin Summit". If i was a meat producer, id liquidate. Watch the video above. Who gains if meat production is driven out? Beyond meat. Who owns the majority in it? The same name that gets repeated in your video furrow. Can you do anything about it, assuming it's real? Nope. But you can manage it if you know where it's headed.

    Comment


      #3
      Why would a company like UPS be parrotting some UN manifesto right in plain sight. Conspiracy right?

      Some take over is underway and there are a lot of frontline sheep ready to volunteer as cannon fodder.

      Business and land owners in the back.

      https://www.ups.com/us/en/services/knowledge-center/article.page?kid=art173718ac052&articlesource=long itudes COVID-19's Legacy: This Is How to Get the Great Reset Right

      Comment


        #4
        I take the ups video and conclude, spending of 10 trillion should be on infrastructure, invest the money.

        As a part of the impending taxes, I would propose that any electronic device that fails before 10 years would have a 20% - direct charge back to the manufacture to cover, land fills, planned obsolescence, waste of energy and Human Resources etc. Stamp on every piece, minimum “ useful too date” I hate the disposeable 5 year appliances we have now!

        Comment

        • Reply to this Thread
        • Return to Topic List
        Working...